Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Randomized Phase 2: Changes from baseline in blood Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Cancer Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) at the beginning of each cycle and at the end of treatment |
|
Screening (Day -28 to -1) through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Other |
Randomized Phase 2: Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status in Formalin-fixed and Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) samples using established Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays in tumor sample versus germline control at screening |
|
Screening (Day -28 to Day -1) |
|
Primary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) during the DLT-evaluation period (which is the first 28 days after the first dose of study intervention in the SLI) |
|
Day 1 to Day 28 |
|
Primary |
Randomized Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) |
Defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest documented disease progression as determined by BICR assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1., or death due to any cause |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Type and severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03 |
|
Informed consent through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable or abnormal changes from baseline of physical examinations |
Standard physical examinations on cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatological, ophthalmological and neurological systems will be performed and will be evaluated based on normal/abnormal and clinical significance observations. Number of participants with TEAEs related to abnormal or clinical significance observations to the physical examinations after the start of study drug will be reported. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable or abnormal changes in vital signs from baseline of vital sign examinations. |
Clinically notable elevated values: Systolic blood pressure (BP): = 160 mmHg and an increase = 20 mmHg from baseline; Diastolic BP: = 100 mmHg and an increase = 15 mmHg from baseline; Heart rate : = 120 beats/min (bpm) with increase from baseline of = 15 bpm; Weight (kg) increase from baseline of = 10%; Body temperature(°C) = 37.5°C). Clinically notable low values: Systolic BP: = 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of = 20 mmHg; Diastolic BP: = 50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of = 15 mmHg; Heart rate: = 50 bpm with decrease from baseline of = 15 bpm; Weight: = 20% decrease from baseline; Body temperature [°C]: = 36 °C. Number of participants with TEAEs related to notable changes to the vital signs after the start of study drug will be reported. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable or abnormal changes from baseline of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) |
12-lead ECGs will be obtained using an internationally recognized 12-lead cardiograph. Clinically notable ECG values: QT (ms) and QT interval (ms) corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals (ms) : increase from baseline > 30 ms; increase from baseline > 60 ms, new > 450 ms, new > 480 ms, new > 500 ms. Heart rate (beats/min) : increase from baseline > 25% to a value > 100 bpm, decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50 bpm. Number of participants with TEAEs related to abnormal or notable changes to ECG parameters after the start of study drug will be reported. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable changes in clinical safety laboratory parameters from baseline. |
Number of participants with clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter values based on national cancer institute common terminology criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grade, Version 4.03 were graded from Grades 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Clinically notable shift is defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 grades, or to grade 3 or above. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of development of of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and new primary melanoma by dermatological examinations |
This is to monitor for the possible development of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and new primary melanoma, as these have been reported to occur with selective BRAF inhibitor treatment. This assessment will be performed at screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit. |
Screening (Day -28 to -1) through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Performance status assessment using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale |
Scale with a range from 0 to 5 with lower score mean a lower functional impairment, 5 corresponding to death |
Screening (Day -28 to -1) through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of dose interruptions, dose modifications and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) |
|
Day 1 until end of treatment, approximately 1 year |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Plasma concentrations of encorafenib |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Serum concentrations of cetuximab |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase; Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib area under curve (AUC) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab area under curve (AUC) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib minimum concentration (Cmin) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab minimum concentration (Cmin) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib maximum concentration (Cmax) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab maximum concentration (Cmax) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Objective response rate (ORR) |
Objective response rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall best response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Safety Lead-in Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) (months); defined for responders complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) only, is duration of time from the date of the first documented response to the earliest date of disease progression |
Duration of response, defined as the time from first documented response (complete response or partial response) to the earliest date of disease progression as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, or death due to underlying disease. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 18 to 35 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Progression-free survival (PFS) |
Progression-free survival defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization to the earliest date of disease progression, as determined by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR) |
Overall response rate (for confirmed and unconfirmed responses) defined as the proportion of participants with a confirmed (resp. unconfirmed) best overall response of either complete response or partial response, as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR) |
Duration of response defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (complete response or partial response) to the earliest date of disease progression, as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Disease control rate (DCR) |
Disease control rate (DCR), defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of either complete response, partial response or stable disease (SD), as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) and investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Response (TTR) |
Time to Response (for confirmed and unconfirmed responses) is defined as the time between date of randomization until first documented response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS) |
Overall survival is defined as time from randomization until date of death due to any cause |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Type and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03 |
|
Informed consent date through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable or abnormal changes from baseline of physical examinations |
Standard physical examinations on cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatological, ophthalmological and neurological systems will be performed and will be evaluated based on normal/abnormal and clinical significance observations. Number of participants with TEAEs related to abnormal or clinical significance observations to the physical examinations after the start of study drug will be reported |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable changes in vital signs from baseline. |
Clinically notable elevated values: Systolic blood pressure (BP): = 160 mmHg and an increase = 20 mmHg from baseline; Diastolic BP: = 100 mmHg and an increase = 15 mmHg from baseline; Heart rate : = 120 beats/min (bpm) with increase from baseline of = 15 bpm; Weight (kg) increase from baseline of = 10%; Body temperature(°C) = 37.5°C). Clinically notable low values: Systolic BP: = 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of = 20 mmHg; Diastolic BP: = 50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of = 15 mmHg; Heart rate: = 50 bpm with decrease from baseline of = 15 bpm; Weight: = 20% decrease from baseline; Body temperature [°C]: = 36 °C. Number of participants with TEAEs related to notable changes to the vital signs after the start of study drug will be reported. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable or abnormal changes to electrocardiogram evaluations from baseline |
12-lead ECGs will be obtained using an internationally recognized 12-lead cardiograph. Clinically notable ECG values: QT (ms) and QT interval (ms) corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals (ms): increase from baseline > 30 ms; increase from baseline > 60 ms, new > 450 ms, new > 480 ms, new > 500 ms; Heart rate (beats/min): increase from baseline > 25% to a value > 100 bpm, decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50 bpm. Number of participants with TEAEs related to abnormal or notable changes to ECG parameters after the start of study drug will be reported. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to notable changes in clinical safety laboratory parameters from baseline. |
Number of participants with clinically notable shift from baseline in laboratory parameter values based on national cancer institute common terminology criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grade, Version 4.03 were graded from Grades 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Clinically notable shift is defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 grades, or to grade 3 or above. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Incidence of development of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and new primary melanoma by dermatological examinations |
This is to monitor for the possible development of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and new primary melanoma, as these have been reported to occur with selective BRAF inhibitor treatment. This assessment will be performed at screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: To determine the performance status using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale. |
Scale with a range from 0 to 5 with lower score mean a lower functional impairment, 5 corresponding to death |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: To determine if there is any change from baseline in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire scores |
EORTC QLQ-C30 consist of nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting); and a global health and Quality of Life (QoL) scale. Each scale in the questionnaire will be scored (0 to 100). High scores represents a high health/quality of life |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: To determine if there is any change from baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire scores. |
EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system has five dimension (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), each is rated according to a five-point verbal rating scale (VRS): 1. no problems, 2. slight problems, 3. moderate problems, 4. severe problems and 5. extreme problems) and translated into a five-digit number that describes the participant's health state. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: To determine if there is any change from baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) questionnaire scores |
FACT-C is a validated quality of life questionnaire for patient reported outcome assessment. FACT-C consists of 36 items, presented on a five-point Likert scale, in four domains of well-being (physical, emotional, social and functional) and the Colorectal Cancer Subscale. Higher score reflects a better quality of life. |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: To determine if there is any changes in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire scores. |
PGIC will ask participants to evaluate their CRC symptoms since starting study intervention according to a seven-point verbal rating scale (VRS): 1. very much improved, 2. much improved, 3. minimally improved, 4. no change, 5. minimally worse, 6. much worse, 7. very much worse |
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Plasma concentrations of encorafenib |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Serum concentrations of cetuximab |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2; Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib area under curve (AUC) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab area under curve (AUC) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib minimum concentration (Cmin) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab minimum concentration (Cmin) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from plasma concentration of encorafenib maximum concentration (Cmax) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter derived from serum concentration of cetuximab maximum concentration (Cmax) in Chinese participants |
|
Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2; Each cycle = 28 days |
|
Secondary |
Randomized Phase 2: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis using the ARRAY 818 302 study PK data |
|
Day 1 through to study completion, approximately from 12 to 29 months |
|