Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 2a Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of BAX69 in Combination With 5-FU/Leucovorin or Panitumumab Versus Standard of Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Takeda |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BAX69 in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) or panitumumab to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of each combination; and to compare the efficacy between BAX69 in combination with 5-FU/LV for subjects with KRAS or NRAS mutated tumor (mt) or panitumumab, for subjects with KRAS and NRAS wild type tumor (wt) and standard of care (SoC) per investigator choice as third or fourth treatment line in subjects with progressive measurable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 115 |
Est. completion date | February 15, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | February 15, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Provision of a signed informed consent 2. Male and female subjects 18 years of age and older at the time of screening 3. Subjects who progressed after receiving at least 2, but no more than 3, prior SoC treatment lines 4. Anticipated life expectancy >3 months at the time of screening 5. Weight between 40 kg and 180 kg 6. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of CRC 7. Metastatic CRC not amenable to surgical resection 8. Known KRAS and NRAS mutation status (if unknown status for either of these genes, and no archival tissues is available, a fresh tumor biopsy will be made) 9. At least 1 measurable lesion as defined by RECIST v1.1 10. ECOG PS of 0-2 11. Adequate hematological function, defined as: 1. Platelet count = 100,000/µL 2. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) 3. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1,000/µL 4. Hemoglobin = 9 g/dL, without the need for transfusion in the 2 weeks prior to screening 12. Adequate renal function, defined as serum creatinine = 2.0 times ULN and creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min 13. Adequate liver function, defined as: 1. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) = 2.5 times ULN for subjects without liver metastases, or = 5 times ULN in the presence of liver metastases 2. Bilirubin = 2.0 times ULN, unless subject has known Gilbert's syndrome 14. Adequate venous access 15. For female subjects of childbearing potential, the subject presents with a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agrees to employ 2 forms of adequate birth control measures, including at least 1 barrier method (eg, diaphragm with spermicidal jelly or foam, or [for male partner] condom) throughout the course of the study and for at least 90 days after the last administration of BAX69. Other acceptable contraceptive measures include birth control pills/patches or intrauterine devices 16. For male subjects, the subject must agree to use adequate contraceptive measures including at least 1 barrier method (eg, condom with spermicidal jelly or foam and [for the female partner] diaphragm with spermicidal jelly or foam, birth control pills/patches, or intrauterine device) and abstain from sperm donation throughout the course of the study and for at least 90 days after the last administration of BAX69 17. Subject is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Known central nervous system metastases 2. Prior malignancy(s) within the past 3 years, with the exception of curatively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, locally advanced prostate cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ of breast, in situ cervical carcinoma and superficial bladder cancer 3. Prior treatment with panitumumab for subjects with KRAS and NRAS wt tumor 4. Residual AE from previous treatment > Grade 1 5. Prior intolerance to fluoropyrimidine for subjects with KRAS or NRAS mut tumor 6. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to C1D1, and/or prior diagnoses of congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III or IV), unstable angina, unstable cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication; and/or the subject is at risk for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (eg, hypokalemia, family history or long QT syndrome) 7. Uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure = 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure = 100 mmHg confirmed upon repeated measures 8. LVEF < 40% as determined by echocardiogram performed at screening or within 90 days prior to C1D1 9. QT/QTc interval > 450 msec, as determined by screening ECG performed no earlier than 1 week before C1D1 10. Prior anti-tumor therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, antibody therapy, molecular targeted therapy, retinoid therapy or hormonal therapy) within 4 weeks prior to C1D1. 11. Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to C1D1 12. Active joint inflammation or history of inflammatory arthritis or other immune disorder involving joints 13. Active infection involving IV antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to C1D1 14. Known history of, or active hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) or active tuberculosis 15. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1/2 or other immunodeficiency disease 16. Subject has received a live vaccine within 4 weeks prior to C1D1 17. Known hypersensitivity to any component of recombinant protein production by CHO cells 18. Exposure to an investigational product or investigational device in another clinical study within 4 weeks prior to C1D1, or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an investigational product or device during the course of this study 19. Subject is nursing or intends to begin nursing during the course of the study 20. Any disorder or disease, or clinically significant abnormality on laboratory or other clinical test(s) (eg, blood tests, ECG), that in medical judgment of the investigator may impede the subject's participation in the study, pose increased risk to the subject, and/or confound the results of the study 21. Subject is a family member or employee of the investigator |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care | Bronx | New York |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center | Dallas | Texas |
United States | The Jones Clinic, PC | Germantown | Tennessee |
United States | Indiana University Health | Goshen | Indiana |
United States | Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates, Ltd. | Joliet | Illinois |
United States | Mount Sinai Beth Israel | New York | New York |
United States | University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Hematology Oncology Associates of the Treasure Coast | Port Saint Lucie | Florida |
United States | Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A. | Rockville | Maryland |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | CTRC at University of Texas Health Science Center | San Antonio | Texas |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Baxalta now part of Shire |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Part 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as time between treatment initiation and tumor progression (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1 criteria) or death from any cause, with censoring of participants who were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent. | From start of the study up to safety follow-up visit occurred (30 [-/+7]) days after the last dose of study treatment or until disease progression | |
Primary | Part 1: Number of Participants With Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | DLT was defined as any drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI CTCAE] v4.03) that occurs during the first 28 days after treatment start and that meets any of the following criteria: i) Any >= Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding: mucositis/stomatitis of Grade 3; diarrhea of <3 days duration; nausea and vomiting <3 days duration; fatigue of <7 days duration; alopecia; single laboratory value out of the normal range that has no clinical significance and that resolves to <= Grade 2 with adequate measures within 7 days) ii) Any Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (excluding: grade 4 neutropenia lasting for <= 5 days; isolated grade 4 lymphocytopenia) iii) Grade 3 febrile neutropenia iv) Grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding v) Any life-threatening complication or abnormality not covered in NCI CTCAEv4.03. | From start of study treatment up to 28 days | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Occurrence of Binding and/or Neutralizing Anti-imalumab Antibodies | Number of participants with occurrence of binding and/or neutralizing anti-imalumab antibodies were reported. | From start of study drug administration up to end of treatment (EOT) (approximately 21 Months) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Incidence of Infusion Reactions After Imalumab Administration | Infusion reaction was defined as any relevant sign or symptom occurring during or after imalumab infusion and considered by the investigator as an infusion reaction. | From start of study drug administration up to EOT (approximately 21 Months) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was any AE that results in any of the following outcomes: death, a life-threatening event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other medically important events based upon appropriate medical judgement. TEAEs was defined as any event not present prior to the initiation of the treatments or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatments. | From start of study drug administration up to EOT (approximately 21 Months) | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Response Evaluation According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | Number of participants with response evaluation according to RECIST v1.1 was evaluated according to complete response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions; partial response (PR): >= 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (compared to baseline) and no new lesions; stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as a response nor sufficient growth to qualify as progression; progressive disease (PD): >= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase in sum of diameters of >=5 millimeter (mm) (compared to the previous minimum sum) or progression of a new lesion. | Day 28 of Cycle 2 followed by every 2 Cycles of 28 day Cycles: Day 56, Day 112, Day 168 and Day 224 | |
Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. Here, number of participants analyzed was based on the number of participants who underwent death. | From start of study drug administration up to EOT (approximately 21 Months) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline for Quality of Life (QoL) Measure - European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) | EORTC QLQ-C30 was a validated instrument used to measure QoL and assess symptoms and side effects of treatment and the impact on everyday life.The QLQ-C30 was composed of: A) 5 multi-item functioning scales(physical, role, social, emotional and cognitive), that were answered on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all,2=A Little,3=Quite a Bit,4=Very Much). Each score range from 0 to 100 with a higher score representing a higher level of functioning and a better QoL. B) A global health status/QoL scale that was answered on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Each score range from 0 to 100 with a higher score representing a better QoL. C) 9 symptom scales(fatigue, nausea/vomiting,pain,financial impact/difficulties,appetite loss,diarrhea, constipation,sleep disturbance/insomnia and dyspnea), that were answered on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all,2=A Little,3=Quite a Bit,4=Very Much). Each score range from 0 to 100 with a higher score representing a greater degree of symptoms and a worse QoL. | Baseline, 21 Months (EOT) up to follow-up |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01228734 -
A Trial to Compare Oxaliplatin, Folinic Acid (FA) and 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) Combination Chemotherapy (FOLFOX-4) With or Without Cetuximab in the 1st Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in Chinese Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (RAS) Wild-type Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05178745 -
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study Evaluating Resection Rate in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI - Observatoire résection
|
||
Completed |
NCT01591421 -
P13Kinase Inhibitor BKM120 in Combination With Panitumumab in Metastatic/Advanced RAS-Wild Type Colorectal Cancer.
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05412706 -
Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in mCRC With a Partial o Complete Response After Oxaliplatin-based Induction Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04430985 -
FOLFOX + Immunotherapy With Intrahepatic Oxaliplatin for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03182894 -
Epacadostat in Combination With Pembrolizumab and Azacitidine in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05725200 -
Study to Investigate Outcome of Individualized Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03176264 -
PDR001 in Combination With Bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6 as First Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic MSS Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04866290 -
HepaSphere™ Microspheres Prospective Registry
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06425133 -
Regorafenib in Combination With Multimodal Metronomic Chemotherapy for Chemo-resistant Metastatic Colorectal Cancers
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05531045 -
18FFDG PET/CT for Early Evaluation of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Colic Adenocarcinoma
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03982173 -
Basket Trial for Combination Therapy With Durvalumab (Anti-PDL1) (MEDI4736) and Tremelimumab (Anti-CTLA4) in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02906059 -
Study of Irinotecan and AZD1775, a Selective Wee 1 Inhibitor, in RAS or BRAF Mutated, Second-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02575378 -
Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine Metronomic Chemotherapy and Chinese Traditional Medicine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02535988 -
Abscopal Effect for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02848807 -
Chemotherapy-related Toxicity, Nutritional Status and Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02077868 -
Evaluation of MGN1703 Maintenance Treatment in Patients With mCRC With Tumor Reduction During Induction Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02414009 -
Study to Compare CAPTEM vs FOLFIRI as Second Line Treatment in Advanced, Colorectal Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01949194 -
Study to Determine the Efficacy of Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients and to Discover Biomarkers
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01915472 -
A Phase II Study of IMMU 130 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
|
Phase 2 |