View clinical trials related to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:Evaluation of the sensitivity of the immuno-PET PET / CT pretargeted with the bispecific anti-CEA x anti-HSG TF2 antibody and IMP-288 peptide labeled with Gallium-68 for imaging potential candidate patients for surgery of local resection of one or more metastases at diagnosis or during relapse CCR expressing CEA.
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and efficacy of LifePearl microspheres loaded with irinotecan in the treatment of liver predominant mCRC by chemoembolization.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluorouracil (5-FU), levofolinate calcium (l-LV), oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and irinotecan hydrochloride hydrate (CPT-11) (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients who harbor Uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) *1/*1, *1/*6 or *1/*28.
The investigators do the clinical trial (patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with donafenib after failure of standard therapy) to assess safety and efficacy of donafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, progressing after all approved standard therapies.
Iron deficiency has a high prevalence in colorectal cancer patients ranging at ca. 60%. About 70% of these patients suffer from iron deficiency anemia (IDA) which adds both physical and cognitive impediments to an already straining chemotherapy. Moreover, a chronic disease like cancer often results in a reduced availability of iron for the body. In clinical practice iron substitution is usually administered orally. Due to low resorption rates, frequent gastric side effects and thus poor patient compliance a parenteral substitution seems to be a better option in terms of efficacy. In the framework of a randomized multicenter clinical trial ('FerInject') a comparison of efficacy parameters of parenteral vs. oral iron substitution will now be conducted in order to identify the best treatment form for clinical practice in oncology. Furthermore detailed quality of life-data (QoL) will be collected in both treatment arms for effect comparison.
The purpose of the study is to measure high grade (3-5) toxicity of regorafenib and to monitor the impact of treatment with regorafenib on the quality of life in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Open-label, randomized, multicenter, Phase II trial designed to estimate the efficacy of CAPTEM versus FOLFIRI as second line treatment in MGMT methylated, RAS mutated advanced CRC patients who have progressed on or after first-line oxaliplatin containing chemotherapy for metastatic disease. MGMT will be assessed centrally at Pathology Department of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori prior to enrollment. A minimum of ten 3-micron unstained sections on charged slides of tumor will be required and methylation status will be provided within a maximum of seven days to the Study Centers. Presence of RAS mutation will be assessed at each local participating center. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms: - Arm A (experimental arm): CAPTEM - Arm B (control arm): FOLFIRI Study treatment will be given in cycles repeated every 28 days for Arm A and every 14 days for Arm B. Patients in Arm A will receive capecitabine at the oral dose of 1500 mg/mq/die bid from day 1 to day 14 every 28 days plus temozolomide 150 mg/mq/die bid starting on day 9 to 14 every 28 days. Patients in Arm B will receive FOLFIRI chemotherapy starting Day 1 q2w (every cycle) starting on Day 1 of Cycle 1. FOLFIRI consists of irinotecan (starting dose of 180 mg/m2) on day one only; 5-FU 7 (starting bolus and 22-hour infusional doses of 400 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2, respectively), and leucovorin (racemic, starting dose of 200 mg/m2 or L-form, starting dose of 100 mg/m2) for two consecutive days. Treatment will continue for up to 6 cycles in Arm A and up to 12 cycles in Arm B or up to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal. Randomization will be stratified across the treatment arms by the following predefined stratification variables: disease progression within 9 months from the start of first-line oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy (< vs. ≥9 months); prior bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (yes vs. no). Efficacy assessments will be performed every 2 cycles in Arm A and every 4 cycles in Arm B until progression. The study is expected to enrol approximately 82 patients who meet the eligibility criteria.
National multicentric phase II trial evaluating whether single agent cetuximab is effective as maintenance therapy after 8 cycles of first line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in mCRC patients with KRAS and NRAS wild-type genes, assessed by progression-free survival at 6 months after start of maintenance therapy.
The purpose of this study is to confirm that linear quantification of CD3+ cells is a prognostic biomarker in localized colorectal carcinomas.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects and safety of Anlotinib with placebo in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies.