View clinical trials related to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:NIPIRESCUE is a national, single-arm, open-label phase II study. The study aims to evaluate the clinical activity of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with MSI/dMMR mCRC resistant to anti-PD1 monotherapy and previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatine, irinotecan, and anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy.
Colorectal cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer death in France. Its incidence is nearly 45,000 new cases per year in 2017, with an estimated 5-year survival of 63% in 2015. Metastases are seen in 40-60% of colorectal cancer cases. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 5% to 15% for patients with widespread metastatic disease. Two types of treatments are used to treat colon cancer: surgery and medication protocol (chemotherapeutic drugs and targeted therapies). These treatments can be used alone or in combination. The current choice of a first line of chemotherapy is left to the practitioner's discretion, after consultation with a multidisciplinary consultation meeting. The choice of treatment(s) depends on official recommendations and is based on the results of clinical trials conducted on large populations, and takes into account the toxicities of the therapies used and the general condition of the patients. The therapeutic combinations for colorectal cancers are therefore multiple. However, to date, no consensus has been reached to ensure that each patient is treated effectively and as a unique case. Today, functional sensitivity tests offer the possibility for patients to be offered a personalized treatment against cancer. This is the case of the Oncogramme® device developed by Oncomedics, which is the first functional sensitivity test dedicated to oncology in Europe. It is based on an in vitro analysis of each patient's tumor cells in order to compare the responses of the tumor cells to the different molecules and therapeutic combinations available (chemotherapy ± targeted therapy). This response, translated into a tumor-specific sensitivity profile, can be used by the medical team to determine the most appropriate treatment for the patient. This test is therefore likely to improve the benefit-risk ratio of a chemotherapy treatment in colorectal cancer by allowing the medical team to select, among the treatments deemed effective, the one that will be the most effective on the tumor and possibly with the least side effects. The hypothesis of this study is that the personalization of treatments (by chemotherapy associated or not with targeted therapies) proposed by the Oncogramme®-colorectal device would allow to promote the best possible clinical response, to limit the side effects and ultimately to improve the survival and the quality of life of the patient.
This is a non-profit phase II, randomized clinical study of the combination of avelumab plus cetuximab as rechallenge strategy, compared to cetuximab alone, in pre-treated RAS/BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients (according to liquid biopsy at baseline). Patients have been treated in first line with chemotherapy in combination with cetuximab and have had a clinical benefit (complete or partial response) from treatment.
This study is designed as an open-label, dose-escalation manner to determine the MFD of chidamide in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced mCRC.
Thalidomide has both anti-angiogenesis and antiemetic effects, and its combined use with TAS-102 may reduce the gastrointestinal reactions associated with TAS-102, while enhancing antitumor efficacy and reducing the side effects of chemotherapy, and its cost is significantly lower than that of bevacizumab, which has higher pharmacoeconomics and greater clinical research application value.
This is an exploratory, non-controlled, multi-cohort, phase II small-sample clinical study designed to evaluate the clinical benefit of second-line treatment with anlotinib plus irinotecan or further in combination with a PD-1 monoclonal antibody (penpulimab) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after first-line treatment failure. To explore the rationality of the combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy and immunotherapy strategy and obtain relevant survival and safety data. The study will fully evaluate the efficacy, PFS, OS, safety and related biomarkers of the regimen.
The purpose of this study is to learn about the effects of three study medicines (encorafenib, cetuximab, and pembrolizumab) given together for the treatment of colorectal cancer that: - is metastatic (spread to other parts of the body); - has the condition of genetic hypermutability (tendency to mutation) or impaired DNA mismatch repair (MMR) - has a certain type of abnormal gene called "BRAF" and; - has not received prior treatment. All participants in this study will receive pembrolizumab at the study clinic as an intravenous (IV) infusion (given directly into a vein) at the study clinic. In addition, half of the participants will take encorafenib by mouth at home every day and cetuximab by IV infusion at the study clinic. The study team will monitor how each participant is doing with the study treatment during regular visits at the study clinic.
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Around 30% of patients present with advanced disease and 50% of those that attempt curative surgery will eventually relapse. The potential synergism of combining PARP inhibitor and PD-L1 is based on the hypothesis that pharmacological inhibition of PARP by olaparib will result in enhanced immunogenicity which can be further enhanced with an immune checkpoint inhibitor such as pembrolizumab. This may occur through a number of mechanisms, such as increased production of cytokines and chemokines that have the potential to promote antitumour immunity, upregulation of surface receptors which render tumour cells more visible to detection by cytotoxic T cells thereby leading to death of tumour cells and release of neoantigens, that help promote antigen presentation and immune priming. This hypothesis is supported by preclinical studies in mouse models of cancer, demonstrating that administration of a PARP inhibitor to sensitive tumour types resulted in increased T cell infiltration and immune activation within tumours. The primary hypothesis is that Olaparib and pembrolizumab combination will lead to an increase in objective response rate in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with DNA homologous-recombination-repair deficiency (HRD) from 1.5% in benchmark studies to up to >10%. The primary objective of the study is to determine the objective response rate (ORR) of pembrolizumab in combination with olaparib, assessed by the investigator per RECIST criteria version 1.1. Secondary objectives include efficacy in terms of disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and duration of response (DOR); safety and an exploratory study of biomarkers associated with treatment efficacy and disease prognosis.
Unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains an incurable disease. After failure of conventional treatments involving fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in combination or not with biotherapies targeting EGFR and VEGF; regorafenib shows a modest improvement in overall survival. Recently, trifluridine/tipiracil has also shown efficacy in phase 3 with an overall survival of around 7 months. Trifluridine/tipiracil has become the standard of care for advanced mCRC in most western countries. However, the objective response rate remains very low and the survival gain remains moderate (+2 months). Therefore, new strategies are needed to ensure that mCRC patients who have received multiple lines of therapy can receive more effective treatments. Based on previous clinical trials on IL-1 inhibition and our preclinical data, IL-1 inhibition may increase the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil. The goal is to test whether the addition of XB2001 to trifluridine/tipiracil could be synergistic.
The purpose of the study is to determine if the type of catheter used in the mapping procedure prior to radioembolization improves the delivery of radioactivity to tumor(s) in participants with liver cancer. The name of the devices involved in this study are: - Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System - Standard 2.4F microcatheter, not otherwise specified