ADVOS® Versus CVVHD in Metabolic or Mixed Acidosis

Metabolic Acidosis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison of Two Approved Dialysis Methods for Treatment of Metabolic or Mixed Acidosis in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury and Indication for Renal Replacement Therapy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05842369
• Other study ID #: ADVOS-Acidosis UKE
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 17, 2023
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
• Contact: Olaf Boenisch, MD
• Phone: +4940741035315
• Email: o.boenisch[@]uke.de
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of ADVOS® therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, necessity of renal replacement therapy and acidosis.

The investigators aim at assessing superiority of ADVOS® versus CVVHD for the primary outcome hours alive with normal pH (arterial pH ≤ 7,35) until 24 hours in a modified intention-to-treat analysis (mITT: replacement if dropped out before treatment start).

Description:

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently seen in patients treated at intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. AKI occurs in more than 30% of critically ill patients. Various definitions for AKI have been used in the last decades, as a consequence reported incidence rates vary considerably from 13 to 78% in critically ill patients. AKI reflects a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from mild to se-vere injury, which may result in permanent loss of renal function. AKI is generally detected by a decrease in urine output (oliguria, anuria) and by an increase of renal serum markers (creatinine, blood-urea-nitrogen) with subsequent disorders in electrolyte homeostasis (e.g. hyperkalemia) and acid-base-regulation by means of metabolic acidosis. The AKIN criteria are well established criteria for diagnosis of AKI.

Different factors have been associated with development of AKI in critically ill patients. Age and pre-existing comorbidities are risk factors for development of AKI. Furthermore, infection and sepsis seem to be a mayor trigger for AKI. More than 50% of patients with septic shock develop AKI. Besides this radiocontrast agents, rapid progressive glomerulonephritis, rhabdomyolysis, trauma, circulatory shock, cardiac surgery, major non-cardiac surgery, nephrotoxic drugs and other causes are capable inducing AKI.

Metabolic acidosis, a frequent finding in AKI, is diagnosed when serum pH is reduced (pH < 7,35) and serum bicarbonate levels are abnormally low. Three major mechanisms lead to metabolic acidosis: 1) increased acid generation 2) loss of bicarbonate 3) decreased renal acid excretion. In AKI reduction of urine output and dimi-nished renal acid excretion results in subsequent metabolic acidosis.

Typical indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT) are hyperkalaemia, severe metabolic acidosis, diuretic-resistant volume overload, oliguria, anuria, uremic complications and some drug intoxications.

The use of RRT in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients increased over the last decades. In ICU setting continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) like continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration are frequently used. Especially haemodynamic unstable patients benefit from CRRT compared to intermittent hemodialysis. Exact timing of starting CRRT and optimal intensity is still unk-nown.

The ADVOS device is a newly developed dialysis system based on the use of recycled albumin dialysate. The system has shown a high detoxification capacity in in-vitro and preclinical studies. The ADVOS procedure com-bines various therapeutic features that might be beneficial for patients with AKI. The ADVOS® device is capab-le to correct acid-base disorders like metabolic acidosis. Recent studies demonstrated a strong potential of correction of acidosis in critically ill patients suffering from multiorgan failure. Although the device is approved, there is a lack of clinical studies comparing of its effect on acidosis versus to other dialysis devices, that all can be used during clinical routine according to its indication.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 52
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: April 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Metabolic or mixed acidosis with pH = 7.25 and base excess = -6 mmol/l

• Age = 18 years

• Acute kidney injury with need for Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancy

• Wards of the state/Prisoners

• Expected survival of less than 24 hours

• Contraindication for citrate anticoagulation

• Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Acidosis
• Metabolic Acidosis

Intervention

Device:
• ADVOS
Modulation of acid-base regulation in patients with acute kidney injury, meta- bolic or mixed acidosis and indication for renal replacement therapy
• CVVHD
Modulation of acid-base regulation in patients with acute kidney injury, meta- bolic or mixed acidosis and indication for renal replacement therapy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf	Hamburg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Hours alive with normal pH (= 7.35) within first 24 hours of therapy	pH values are measured to determine acidaemia in critically ill patients. As defined by the study protocol, pH = 7.25 and base excess = -6 mmol/l are required to diagnose metabolic or mixed acidosis. Normalisation of pH (defined as = 7.35, representing the lower margin of the pyhsiological pH range) is used as a surrogate marker for reversal of acedaemia and, thereby, device effectiveness. The time (hours) alive within the defined physiological range after initiation of therapy in the first 24 hours will be used to compare the intervention and control group.	First 24 hours after initiation of study-specific therapy
Secondary	Time to first pH normalisation (= 7.35)	pH values are measured to determine azidemia in critically ill patients. As defined by the study protocol, pH = 7.25 and base excess = -6 mmol/l are required to diagnose metabolic or mixed acidosis. Normalisation of pH (defined as = 7.35, representing the lower margin of the pyhsiological pH range) is used as a surragate marker for reversal of acedaemia and, thereby, device effectiveness. The time (hours) until reaching the defined physiological range for the first time will be used to compare the intervention and control group.	First 24 hours after initiation of study-specific therapy
Secondary	Days free of mechanical ventilation within the first 28d after randomization	Days free of mechanical ventilation across 28 days is used to compare the respiratory outcome between intervention and control group.	From start of study-specific therapy until day 28
Secondary	Days free of vasopressor therapy within the first 28d after randomization	Days free of vasopressor therapy within the first 28 days after randomization are used as surrogate marker to compare sepsis/vasoplegia reversal between intervention and control group.	From initiation of study-specific therapy until day 28
Secondary	Days free of renal replacement therapy within the first 28d after randomization	Days free of renal replacement therapy within the first 28 days after randomization are used as an indicator of renal organ failure. Need for and length of renal replacement therapy is a prognostic factor in critically ill intensive care patients.	Assessment at baseline, days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 as long as patient is still on intensive care unit
Secondary	Course of severity of organ failure	Severity of organ failures will be assessed on a daily basis using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-Score. Possible scores range from 0 to 24 points, whereby a higher score indicates a higher degree of organ failure.	Assessment at baseline, days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 as long as patient is still on intensive care unit
Secondary	Course of arterial blood gases	The dynamics of arterial blood gases will be used to compare the intervention and control group.	Time points Baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 48, 72 hours. If patient is still on intensive care unit, also on day 7, 14, 28
Secondary	Course of systemic hemodynamics	The course of systemic haemodynamics is determined on the basis of vital parameters (e.g. mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate) as well as volume administration and catecholamine therapy will be used to compare the intervention and control group.	Timepoints Baseline, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 48, 72 hours. If patient is still on intensive care unit, also on day 7, 14, 28
Secondary	Intensive Care Unit and hospital length of stay	Time point for discharge from intensive care unit and hospital stay	Assessment of status on day 28 and day 90
Secondary	28 days and 90 days mortality	Comparison of 28- as well as 90-day mortality between the study arms	Assessment of status on day 28 and day 90
Secondary	Requirement and number of transfusions during ICU	The number of transfusions during ICU stay as well as the reason for need.	Cumulative assessment until day 28 or end of intensive care unit stay, whichever comes first.
Secondary	Biomarkers (i.e. markers of inflammation, coagulation, endothelial function, metabolism, drug monitoring)	Analysis of the changes in different biomarkers during the study-specific therapy to compare the two study groups up to day 28 or the transfer of metabolism, drug monitoring)	Assessment at Baseline and time points 4, 16, 24, 48, 72 hours after initiation of study specific therapy as well as on day 7 and 28, if patient is still on intensive care unit