RCT Novasure Versus Novasure + Mirena IUS in the Treatment of Menorrhagia

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Hypothesis. Combined treatment with novasure and mirena IUS confers benefit over Novasure alone in the treatment of menorrhagia

Clinical Trial Description

Endometrial ablation is a commonly used treatment option for women with heavy periods. It is recommended as an initial treatment. It aims at destroying the lining of the womb to reduce heavy menstrual loss.

A hormone releasing device in the womb (MIRENA®)is another commonly used treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding and has added benefit of reducing cyclical pain.

There is an increase in the number of women presenting to gynaecology clinic with persistence of pain or cyclical pain with absent or light bleeding after second generation endometrial ablation (Novasure). This may be due to the pockets of active lining of the womb that remains after ablation or possible adhesions created by the treatment. Most women require surgical removal of the womb (hysterectomy) because of pain or a further surgical procedure to divide these adhesions in an attempt to relieve pain and drain any collections in the womb.

We aim to determine if the combined use of MIRENA® and NOVASURE® (which is the second generation endometrial ablation technique used in our unit) will help in reducing the number of women presenting with cyclical pain and requiring further intervention or surgery. The aim of the current study is to compare between women receiving only NOVASURE treatment and women receiving combined NOVASURE and MIRENA treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months by a patient questionnaire. The primary outcome is improvement in quality of life The secondary outcomes include

- Lowering of surgical intervention

- Reduction in pain

- Reduction in amount of bleeding This will be a pilot study to determine if the theory is correct and then a larger powered study can be undertaken ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Menorrhagia

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01965587
Study type	Interventional
Source	Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
Contact
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	December 2013

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT02824224` - Tamoxifen to Reduce Unscheduled Bleeding in New Users of the Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS)	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT01651468` - The Effect of the Nutraceutical "Hemofix" on the Coagulation System	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02616731` - Oral Tranexamic Acid Versus Diosmin for Treatment of Menorrhagia in Women Using Copper IUD	Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT02087228` - Evaluation of the Endometrial Cavity After Endometrial Ablation	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00953641` - Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01436903` - Chances for Success of CavatermTM Surgery as a Function of Uterus Probe Length	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT00768742` - Safety and Effectiveness Study of RF Ablation of Uterine Fibroids to Reduce Menstrual Bleeding: the Fibroid Ablation Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT00152256` - A Study to Evaluate of the Safety and Effectiveness of Asoprisnil in Treating Women With Uterine Fibroids	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00156195` - Study to Evaluate the Safety of Asoprisnil in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00160381` - A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Asoprisnil in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT02228174` - Sonography Guided Transcervical Ablation of Uterine Fibroids	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01969396` - Evaluation of the Goldstein SonoBiopsy™ Catheter for Diagnosing Endometrial Pathology	N/A
Completed	`NCT00386308` - Efficacy and Safety Study of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00393198` - Bleeding Pattern and User Satisfaction During Second Consecutive MIRENA® in Contraception and Treatment of Menorrhagia	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00966264` - Hysterectomy and Levonorgestrel Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) in the Treatment of Menorrhagia	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00904709` - The Assessment of Tranexamic Acid in Women With Menorrhagia Who Have Bleeding Disorders	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT03670680` - Efficiency of Lina LibrataTM System	N/A
Completed	`NCT02584088` - Ultrasound Appearance of the Endometrium Post Radio-Frequency Ablation
Completed	`NCT02835391` - PerClot Compared to Usual Care in Gynaecology Procedures	N/A
Completed	`NCT02304510` - Prevalence of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Female Population Living in Beijing

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.