View clinical trials related to Membranous Nephropathy.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and therapeutic potential of BCX9930 in participants with C3G, IgAN, or PMN.
Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is an antibody-mediated autoimmune glomerular disease, that represents one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The first-generation chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is effective in inducing MN remission in the majority of patients, but a significant fraction of them can experience disease relapses that require multiple re-treatments over time. Repeated infusions may result in hypersensitivity reactions, which contraindicate further treatment with rituximab. Independent of previous treatment response, Rituximab-Intolerant patients require a safe and effective therapeutic alternative that could reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. On the other end a substantial proportion of patients do not benefit of rituximab therapy and might benefit of other anti CD20 monoclonal antibodies. A few patients transiently benefit of rituximab but their relapses after rituximab administration are so frequent that they spend most of their live with nephrotic range proteinuria (rituximab-dependent patients). Obinutuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody with enhanced B cell-depleting potential. Due to humanization and glycoengineering, this drug may be safe and effective in inducing disease remission even in patients with prior hypersensitivity reactions to rituximab. Moreover, it has been found to be effective in patients with membranous nephropathy who failed to respond to rituximab.
Membranous nephropathy (MN) - the leading cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults - is an immune-mediated disease that results from the deposition of immunoglobulins and complement components onto the sub-epithelial layer of the glomerular capillary wall. The availability for clinical use of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface antigen CD20, offered the opportunity to test the effects of specific CD20-targeted intervention aimed to prevent B-cell dependent mechanisms resulting in the production of nephritogenic autoantibodies. Rituximab-induced B-cell depletion reduced proteinuria in eight patients with MN while avoiding the adverse effects of steroids and other immunosuppressants. Subsequent studies confirmed that rituximab is remarkably safer than non-specific immunosuppressive agents, including cyclosporine, and achieves remission in approximately two-thirds of patients with MN-associated nephrotic syndrome. After rituximab-induced remission, however, NS may relapse in approximately one third of patients. Thus, novel therapeutic options are needed for a substantial proportion of patients with MN who may fail rituximab therapy. Conceivably, in patients with MN refractory to CD20-targeted therapy, the production of nephritogenic autoantibodies is sustained by mechanisms that do not depend on autoreactive CD20+ B cells. Recently, it was shown that CD19-negative bone marrow plasma cells, which express CD38, are enriched in chronically inflamed tissue and secrete autoantibodies. Treatment of patients with MN with CD38-targeting antibodies may represent a new therapeutic approach. MOR202 is a fully human recombinant monoclonal antibody against CD38 that has demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy in experimental models of multiple myeloma. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis are the principal mechanisms of action for MOR202-induced lysis of myeloma cells. The working hypothesis is that CD38-targeted therapy with MOR202 may abrogate autoantibody-dependent mechanisms in patients with plasma-cell mediated forms of MN who failed previous treatment with rituximab and second-generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as ofatumumab. With this background, MOR202 therapy may have an indication for patients with MN and NS resistant to CD20 targeted therapy.
This 2-arm, multi-center, open-label, parallel-group phase II trial will assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the human antibody MOR202 in subjects with anti-PLA2R antibody-positive membranous nephropathy indicated for immunosuppressive therapy
This study is a Phase 1b/2a, open-label, sequential-cohort, dose escalation, and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of VB119 in subjects with primary MN
NEPTUNE Match is an additional opportunity offered to NEPTUNE study participants to prospectively recruit and communicate patient-specific clinical trial matching with kidney patients and their physician investigators.
National cohort of all cases of membranous nephropathy (MN) during a 1 year period in France, based on a pathological and/or serological diagnostic, collecting the data on: - incidence of MN - prevalence of anti-PLA2R1 and anti-THSD7A - clinical outcome one year after diagnosis or after relapse (complete remission, partial remission or persistent nephrotic syndrome) - environmental risk factors for the onset of MN - HLA markers - patient care status in France
This phase I study is a single arm, multi-dose study that will evaluate steady-state apixaban pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) in subjects with Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) vs healthy control subjects. This study will enroll 20 subjects diagnosed with NS and 10 healthy control subjects. Comparing differences in steady-state apixaban PK/PD parameters between subjects with NS and healthy volunteers will be essential to identifying a safe and effective apixaban dose and dose administration schedule for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. The majority of MN patients show detectable circulating antibodies against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). Infusion of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies results in a profound depletion of B-cells, which are thought to be responsible for anti-PLA2R production. B-cell depletion is followed by NS remission in 70% of cases. Limited evidence highlighted that differences in the B- and T-cell compartments may exist between responders and non-responders. Owing to the non-homogenous efficacy of anti-CD20 treatment, investigators hypothesize that in MN patients who experience NS remission after B-cell depleting therapy, autoreactive B-cells may be mostly circulating, whereas in patients who do not respond to the same treatment, autoreactive B-cells may chiefly reside into secondary lymphoid organs - and thus be more resistant to the drug action. Researchers will therefore extensively analyze the circulating immune repertoire of MN patients before and after the infusion of B-cell lineage depleting agents, assessing the presence of circulating PLA2R autoreactive B cells from appropriately stratified responder and non-responder patients. Patients and healthy controls will be enrolled in this study. Patients will be stratified according to gender, anti-PLA2R status, type of B-cell lineage depleting agent received and response to treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of belimumab and intravenous rituximab co-administration at inducing a complete remission (CR) compared to rituximab alone in participants with primary membranous nephropathy. Background: Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is among the most common causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. MN affects individuals of all ages and races. The peak incidence of MN is in the fifth decade of life. Primary MN is recognized to be an autoimmune disease, a disease where the body's own immune system causes damage to kidneys. This damage can cause the loss of too much protein in the urine. Drugs used to treat MN aim to reduce the attack by one's own immune system on the kidneys by blocking inflammation and reducing the immune system's function. These drugs can have serious side effects and often do not cure the disease. There is a need for new treatments for MN that are better at improving the disease while reducing fewer treatment associated side effects. In this study, researchers will evaluate if treatment with a combination of two different drugs, belimumab and rituximab, is effective at blocking the immune attacks on the kidney compared to rituximab alone. Rituximab works by decreasing a type of immune cell, called B cells. B cells are known to have a role in MN. Once these cells are removed, disease may become less active or even inactive. However, after stopping treatment, the body will make new B cells which may cause disease to become active again. Belimumab works by decreasing the new B cells produced by the body and, may even change the type of new B cells subsequently produced. Belimumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (also referred to as lupus or SLE). Rituximab is approved by the FDA to treat some types of cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and vasculitis. Neither rituximab nor belimumab is approved by the FDA to treat MN. Treatment with a combination of belimumab and rituximab has not been studied in individuals with MN, but has been tested in other autoimmune diseases, including lupus nephritis and Sjögren's syndrome.