Melasma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Topical Silymarin With Hydroquinone in the Treatment of Melasma
A randomized clinical trial will be done on 92 patients , randomly divided into two groups by lottery method to compare the efficacy and safety of topical silymarin cream 0.7% with topical 4% hydroquinone cream. Patients will be treated for 3 months and for the next 3 months will be followed up for relapse of melasma.
A comparative study done by Nofal A et al, comparing the effectiveness and safety of topical
silymarin versus hydroquinone, concluded that silymarin cream can be used as more potent and
safer treatment option for the treatment of melasma.8 Two different concentrations of
silymarin cream (0.7% and 1.4%) were used in this study and the results showed that both the
groups have no statistically significant difference in terms of therapeutic response (mean of
percentage reduction in MASI was 39.21 for 0.7% silymarin cream group and 33.84 for 1.4%
silymarin cream group). Additionally relapse cases were identified in 7.14% of patients in
both the groups. This shows that silymarin used at low concentration can prove to be more
potent than at high concentration when it comes to effectiveness, cost and adverse effects.
Therefore, I will compare 0.7% silymarin cream with 4% hydroquinone cream in my clinical
trial for the treatment of melasma.
Rationale of this study is to observe the effects of this alternative treatment option and
compare it with the first line drug so that it can be recommended in the guidelines as an
alternative treatment option for melasma. The study by Nofal at al. was done in Egypt where
most if the people have type 4 skin and environmental conditions are also similar to
Pakistan. However a very small population group was included in the study. I want to do the
same interventional trial on a larger population size to validate silymarin as an effective
and safer treatment option.
Patients attending ANTH dermatology out patient, fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be
inducted. Informed written consent will be taken from the enrolled patients and
confidentiality will be maintained throughout the study. A detailed history will be taken
focusing on duration and onset, family history, any relation to pregnancy, effect of exposure
to sun, systemic inquiry and prior treatment sought. Fitzpatrick skin type and melisma
pattern will be assessed. Melasma type will be assessed with the help of Wood's light
examination. The severity of melasma will be assessed using MASI score. Random distribution
of patients will be done through lottery method. Group A will be treated with topical
hydroquinone 4% cream applied once daily at night and group B with silymarin 0.7% cream
applied twice daily. All the patients will be advised to have proper sun protection measures,
use physical protection like umbrella or a P cap and a wear sunscreen having a sun protective
factor of at least 60. Patients will be advised not to use topical retinoids or any other
product containing peroxide in it and not to apply the cream near eyes, mouth or nose.
Patients will be asked to do a patch test on volar aspect of arms for 3 days before starting
the treatment on face and immediately stop the treatment and report if she develops erythema
and/or burning sensation with either drug. Digital photography will be taken at baseline and
after every month during the treatment course till three months.
Patients will be booked for follow up at 1 month interval for 6 months. Treatment will be
given for 3 months and will be followed up for the next 3 months (during which patients will
be using only sun protection measures) to observe relapse of melasma. On follow up visits
during treatment period, history will be taken regarding compliance to treatment and drug
tolerance. The MASI score will be calculated at baseline and each follow up visit. Clinical
efficacy will be assessed in terms of percent reduction in MASI score from baseline. Any
adverse effect of treatment and patient's satisfaction using the short assessment of
patient<s satisfaction will be measured at each visit. Information will be recorded on
specially designed performas.
The data will be analyzed with the help of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)
version 25. Data will be presented as mean ± SD for quantitative variables (age, percent
reduction of MASI, Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction) and frequency with percentages
for categorical variables (sun exposure, family history, previous therapy, melasma type,
melasma pattern, melasma severity, burning and erythema). Independent sample t-test will be
used to compare percent reduction in MASI score between both treatment groups at each follow
up. Paired sample t-test will be used to compare the MASI score with baseline at each follow
up visit within both groups. Chi-square test will be applied to compare the clinical
efficacy, and safety in terms of any side effect between both groups throughout the study
period. P-value of <0.05 will be considered significant.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05013801 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Facial Serum Q69 in Moderating the Appearance of Mild to Moderate Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174545 -
Effectiveness and Safety of Pigment Solution Program (PSP) as Adjuvant Therapy in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01695356 -
Ultraviolet and UV-Visible Light Photoprotection for the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278948 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05911698 -
Fractional co2 Laser Followed by Either Vitamin c or Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05656833 -
Combination Topical Cysteamine and Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser for Treatment of Facial Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04597203 -
Efficacy and Safety of Using Combination of 755-nm Picosecond Alexandrite Laser and 2% Hydroquinone Compared With 2% Hydroquinone Alone for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Split-face Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02138539 -
Evaluation of an Herbal-Based De-Pigmenting System
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01661556 -
Clinical Trial of Hydroquinone Versus Miconazol in Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01001624 -
Melanil in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03415685 -
Lutronic PicoPlus Exploratory Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04765930 -
Combined Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Q- Switched Nd:YAG Laser Alone in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04137263 -
Study Evaluating the Efficacy of DOSE Formulations in Treating Melasma and Cutaneous Signs of Aging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03686787 -
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Laser for Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05969587 -
Cysteamine Compared to Hydroquinone in Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00472966 -
Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Tri-Luma® Cream in Sequence With Glycolic Acid Peels for Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00500162 -
Comparison of Two Tri-Luma® Maintenance Regimens in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05884151 -
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05887219 -
Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03308370 -
Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 |