Melasma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Lutronic PicoPlus for the Treatment of Dematological Conditions Such as Unwanted Tattoos and Benign Pigmented Lesions
Verified date | November 2023 |
Source | LUTRONIC Corporation |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study will evaluate the use of the Lutronic PicoPlus for treatment of dermatological conditions such as unwanted tattoos and benign pigmented lesions.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 39 |
Est. completion date | October 3, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | September 6, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male or Female - Adults between age 18 and 60 years old - Group A: Fitzpatrick skin type I - VI for unwanted tattoos and Group B: Fitzpatrick Skin Types I - IV for benign pigmented lesions and other conditions - Unwanted tattoo that contains single or multi-color ink, and - Wiling to cover tattoos with a bandage or clothing; and/or have very limited sun exposure and use an approved sunscreen of SPF 50 or higher on the treated area starting 2 to 4 weeks before the treatment - Ability to read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent Form - Willing to have digital photographs taken of the treatment area and agree to use of photographs for presentation, educational or marketing purposes. - Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures in the areas to be treated - Willing and able to comply with all study participation requirements including returning for follow-up visits and abstaining from exclusionary procedures for the duration of the study Exclusion Criteria: - If receiving treatment for unwanted tattoo: double tattoos (tattoo over tattoo), history of allergic reactions to pigments following tattooing, local anesthetics or topical antibiotics - If receiving treatment for benign pigmented lesions including melasma: history of use of a lightening medication (hydroquinone, tranexamic acid), isotretinoid (or retinoid), or light-sensitive medication in the last 6 months - Known cardiovascular disease or cardiac surgery that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study treatments - Previous interventions or treatment with another device in the target area within 6 months of enrollment or during the study - Pregnant or lactating or planning pregnancy before end of study - Presence of an active systemic, local skin disease, medication or condition that may affect wound healing or interfere with participation or treatment to the active area. - Active or recurrent cancer of current chemotherapy or radiation therapy - History of seizure disorders due to light - History of vitiligo, eczema, or psoriasis - History of connective tissue disease, such as systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma - History of pigmentary disorders, particularly tendency for hyper- or hypo-pigmentation - History of disease stimulated by heat, such as recurrent herpes simplex and/or herpes zoster (shingles) in the treatment area, unless treatment is conducted following a prophylactic regimen - History of keloid scarring, hypertrophic scarring or of abnormal wound healing. - History of immunosuppression/immune deficiency disorders or currently using immunosuppressive medications. - History of seizure disorders due to light. - Suffering from coagulation disorders or taking prescription anticoagulation medications - History of keloid scarring, hypertrophic scarring or of abnormal wound healing Any use of medication that is known to increase sensitivity to light according to Investigator's discretion - Excessive or recent significant tan in areas to be treated or unable/unlikely to refrain from tanning during the study - Current smoker or history of smoking within 3 months of study participation - Systemic use of corticosteroid or isotretinoin within 6 months of study participation - Anytime in life, having have used gold therapy (gold salts) for disorders such as rheumatologic disease or lupus - Any physical or mental condition including alcohol or drug abuse that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with subject's suitability for inclusion in study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Dermatology, Laser, and Vein Specialists of the Carolinas | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | Metro Dermatology | Elmhurst | New York |
United States | Laser and Skin Surgery Center of New York | New York | New York |
United States | Zena Medical | Newport Beach | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
LUTRONIC Corporation |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Blinded Reviewer's Global Assessment of Improvement | Three blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly. Each reviewer will be asked to determine the temporal order (before and after) of each photo pair, and then rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation in the post-treatment photo using the following scale:
3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%) |
3-month (Group B), 6 months (Group A) Post Final treatment | |
Other | Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) | Three blinded experienced, non-treating clinicians will independently evaluate pre- and post-treatment photos of each subject, presented randomly, using the MASI. Each of four regions (forehead, right malar region, left malar region and chin) will be assessed based on three variables: percentage of the total area involved (A), darkness (D), and homogeneity (H). | 3 Months (Group B), 6 Months (Group A) post final treatment | |
Primary | Investigator's Global Assessment of Improvement | Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Physician's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Physician evaluators will review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions:
3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%) |
Up to 6 Months following final study treatment | |
Secondary | Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement | Overall aesthetic improvement based on completion of the Subject's Global Assessment of Improvement Scale. Subjects will be asked review study photos post-final treatment, and rate the degree of tattoo clearing or reduction in benign pigmentation observed in the subject's treated area using the following definitions:
3 = Very significant or complete clearing (75-100%) 2 = Significant clearing (50-74%) 1 = Moderate clearing (25-49%) 0 = Mild or no clearing (0-24%) |
1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatment | |
Secondary | Subject Satisfaction | Following the final study treatment, subjects will be asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the laser treatment outcome and the overall laser treatment procedure, using the Subject Satisfaction Assessment Scale and the following definitions:
2 = Extremely Satisfied 1 = Satisfied 0 = Neutral (-1) = Unsatisfied (-2) = Extremely Unsatisfied |
1 month, 3 Months, 6 Months (Group A Only) post final treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05013801 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Facial Serum Q69 in Moderating the Appearance of Mild to Moderate Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174545 -
Effectiveness and Safety of Pigment Solution Program (PSP) as Adjuvant Therapy in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01695356 -
Ultraviolet and UV-Visible Light Photoprotection for the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278948 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05911698 -
Fractional co2 Laser Followed by Either Vitamin c or Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05656833 -
Combination Topical Cysteamine and Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser for Treatment of Facial Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04597203 -
Efficacy and Safety of Using Combination of 755-nm Picosecond Alexandrite Laser and 2% Hydroquinone Compared With 2% Hydroquinone Alone for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Split-face Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02138539 -
Evaluation of an Herbal-Based De-Pigmenting System
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01661556 -
Clinical Trial of Hydroquinone Versus Miconazol in Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01001624 -
Melanil in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04765930 -
Combined Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Q- Switched Nd:YAG Laser Alone in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04137263 -
Study Evaluating the Efficacy of DOSE Formulations in Treating Melasma and Cutaneous Signs of Aging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03686787 -
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Laser for Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05969587 -
Cysteamine Compared to Hydroquinone in Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00500162 -
Comparison of Two Tri-Luma® Maintenance Regimens in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00472966 -
Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Tri-Luma® Cream in Sequence With Glycolic Acid Peels for Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05887219 -
Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05884151 -
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03308370 -
Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05099601 -
Silymarin Cream Versus Combined Silymarin Cream and Microneedling in Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 |