Melasma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomized, Double-blinded, Split-face Study Comparing the Cosmetic Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Topical Products in Subjects With Moderate Facial Melasma
Verified date | November 2018 |
Source | Allergan |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Lytera 2.0 versus 4% hydroquinone in the improvement of the appearance of moderate facial melasma.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 18 |
Est. completion date | October 9, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | October 9, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Female or male aged 18+ years with general good health - Individuals with dark patches on both sides of their face - Individuals that are willing to provide written informed consent and are able to read, speak, write, and understand English. - Individuals willing to sign have their photographs taken during the study and are willing to sign a photography release. - Willing to stop all facial treatments during the course of the study including botulinum toxin, injectable fillers, microdermabrasion, Intense pulsed light (IPL), peels, facials, waxing, laser treatments and tightening treatments. Threading is allowed but not facial laser hair removal. - Willingness to cooperate follow all study requirements for the duration of the study and to report any changes in health status or medications, adverse event symptoms, or reactions immediately. - Willingness to not begin using any new cosmetic facial make-up during the study. If you regularly use cosmetic facial make-up, you must have used the product(s) without any issues for at least 2 weeks prior to starting the study. - Willingness to avoid sun exposure to the face as much as possible, (including tanning beds), especially from 10 AM to 2 PM. Protective clothing (i.e. hats) and the provided sunscreen should be worn prior to and during any exposure. Exclusion Criteria: - Individuals diagnosed with known allergies to study provided skin care products. - Individuals who are nursing, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study according to subject self-report. - Individuals with a history of skin cancer. - Individuals having a health condition on the face (e.g., psoriasis, rosacea, acne, eczema, seborrheic dermatitis, severe excoriations etc.). - Individuals with a history of immunosuppression/immune deficiency disorders (including (Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)) or currently using immunosuppressive medications (e.g., azathioprine, belimumab, cyclophosphamide, Enbrel, Imuran, Humira, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, prednisone, Remicade, Stelara.) and/or radiation. - Individuals with an uncontrolled disease such as asthma, diabetes, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, or hypothyroidism. Individuals having multiple health conditions may be excluded from participation even if the conditions are controlled by diet, medication, etc. - Individuals with any planned surgeries and/or invasive medical procedures during the course of the study. - Individuals who are currently participating in any other facial usage study or have participated in any clinical trial within 4 weeks prior to inclusion into the study. - Individuals who have observable suntan, scars, nevi, excessive hair, etc. or other dermal conditions on the face that might influence the test results in the opinion of the Investigator or designee. - Individuals who started hormone replacement therapies (HRT) or hormones for birth control less than 3 months prior to study entry or who plan on starting, stopping, or changing doses of HRT or hormones for birth control during the study. - Individuals who used any of the following medications or had any of the listed procedures within the listed time frame prior to the study start date: - Retin-A®, Retin-A Micro®, Renova®, Avita®, Tazorac®, or Differin® within 3 months - Had a light-depth chemical peel or microdermabrasion within 1 month - Had a medium-depth chemical peel, medium-depth microdermabrasion, any systemic steroids, non-ablative laser, light and/or radio frequency or fractional laser resurfacing of the face and neck within 3 months - Any systemic retinoid (e.g. Soriatane®, Accutane®, Roche Dermatologics) within 12 months - Any topical or systemic antibiotics, such as minocycline, or any other known medications that can cause photosensitivity, such as hydrochlorothiazide, lasix, amiodarone, within 1 month - Any topical tretinoin product or derivative, imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, or diclofenac on their face within 3 months - Prescription strength skin lightening products (e.g. 4% hydroquinone, tretinoin, alpha hydroxy acid (AHA), beta hydroxy acid (BHA) and polyhydroxy acids, 15% or 20% azelaic acid, 4-hydroxyanisole alone or in combination with tretinoin, etc.) within 3 months - Any non-prescription cosmetic anti-wrinkle, skin lightening products, or any other product or topical or systemic medication known to affect skin aging or dyshcromia (products containing alpha/beta/poly-hydroxy acids, vitamin C, soy, Q-10, hydroquinone; systemic or licorice extract (topically), Tego® Cosmo C250, gigawhite, lemon juice extract (topically), emblica extract, etc.) within 2 weeks - Have undergone plastic surgery, Dermabrasion (deep skin peel), a deep chemical peel or ablative laser resurfacing of the face and neck within 12 months - Had facial treatment with a botulinum toxin base injectable (Botox), injectable fillers, or a fat transfer within 6 months |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Allergan |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline in Melasma Severity Rating Scale Score to Week 12 | The investigator assessed the participant's facial skin for the severity of symmetrical facial melasma on the left and the right side of the face using the Melasma Severity Rating Scale. The score ranges from 0 to 3, where 0=Cleared: color of melasma lesions approximately equivalent to surrounding normal skin or with minimal residual hyperpigmentation, 1=Mild: color slightly darker than the surrounding normal skin, 2=Moderate: color moderately darker than the surrounding normal skin and 3=Severe: color markedly darker than the surrounding normal skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 | |
Primary | Change From Baseline in Overall Hyperpigmentation Scale Score to Week 12 | The investigator assessed the participant's left and right facial sides for overall hyperpigmentation using the Overall Hyperpigmentation ten-point scale ranging from 0 to 9, where Score 0=None, skin is normal in color with no evidence of hyperpigmentation; Score 1, 2 or 3=Mild, several brown spots with increased pigmentation, they are small in size and slightly darker than surrounding skin; Score 4, 5 or 6=Moderate, many brown spots with increased pigmentation, they are medium in size and much darker than surrounding skin; Score of 7, 8 or 9=Severe, many large brown spots with increased pigmentation, they are large in size and markedly darker than surrounding skin. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 | |
Primary | Change From Baseline in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) Score to Week 12 | The investigator assigned a grade for the left and right facial sides for each of the following: A=Total Area Involved (0=No involvement to 6=90 to 100% involvement); D=Darkness of Pigment (0=Normal skin color to 4=Severe hyperpigmentation); and H=Homogeneity (0=Normal skin color without evidence of hyperpigmentation to 4=Uniform skin involvement without any clear areas). Total Half-Face MASI score was calculated as: Half Forehead 0.15(D+H)A + One Malar Side 0.3 (D+H)A + Half Chin 0.05(D+H)A. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline (Day1) to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants by Responses for Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Overall Improvement in Skin Condition | Using the Subject Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Overall Improvement, the participant selected a response that best represented their feelings on the overall improvement in their skin condition compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were categorized as: 0=No change or a worsening in my skin condition (dark areas of color on skin), 1=I see a slight improvement in my skin condition (approximately 25% overall improvement), 2=I see a moderate improvement in my skin condition (approximately 50% overall improvement), 3=I see a marked improvement in my skin condition (approximately 75% overall improvement), 4=I see a complete clearing of my skin condition (approximately 95% or better overall improvement). | Baseline (Day 1) to Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants by Responses for Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Overall Satisfaction With the Test Product | Using the Subject Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Satisfaction with Treatment, the participant selected a response that best represented their overall satisfaction with the test product. Responses were categorized as: 1=Excellent (very satisfied), 2=Good (moderately satisfied), 3=Fair (slightly satisfied) and 4=Poor (not satisfied at all). | Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants by Responses for Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Test Product Preference | Using the Subject Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Facial Side Preference, the participant selected based on their experience, the Test Product they preferred to use. | Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Melasma Quality of Life (MELASQOL) Scale Total Score to Week 12 | The Melasma Quality of Life Scale assesses the effect melasma has on the quality of life of sufferers on a scale of 1 (not bothered at all) to 7 (bothered all of the time), rating the following questions: 1.The appearance of your skin condition 2.Frustration about your skin condition. 3.Embarrassment about your skin condition. 4.Feeling depressed about your skin condition. 5.The effects of your skin condition on your interactions with other people. 6.The effects of your skin condition on your desire to be with people. 7.Your skin condition making it hard to show affection. 8.Skin discoloration making you feel unattractive to others. 9.Skin discoloration making you feel less vital or productive. 10.Skin discoloration affecting your sense of freedom. The MELASQOL is scored from 7 to 70, with a higher score indicating worse melasma-related health-related quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 | |
Secondary | Investigator's Global Improvement Assessment for Overall Hyperpigmentation Score to Week 12 | Investigator's global improvement assessment score was used for assessment of overall hyperpigmentation on the left and right facial sides. The score ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0=No change or worsening, 1=Mild improvement (approximately 25% overall improvement), 2=Moderate improvement (approximately 50% overall improvement), 3=Marked improvement (approximately 75% overall improvement), 4=Complete clearing/Dramatic improvement (approximately 95% plus overall improvement). The mean score for overall hyperpigmentation was reported. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mexameter Measurement of Target Hyperpigmentation Lesion to Week 12 | Two target hyperpigmented lesions were selected from the left and the right malar facial areas and were measured by the mexameter, an instrument that measures melanin content. One target "normal" measurement was also taken from an unaffected skin area on the face representing normal skin. The values from the target hyperpigmented lesions were compared to the normal lesion value. The range of melamin index and erythema is 0 to 999 Arbitrary Units (AU). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline (Day 1) to Week 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05013801 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Facial Serum Q69 in Moderating the Appearance of Mild to Moderate Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174545 -
Effectiveness and Safety of Pigment Solution Program (PSP) as Adjuvant Therapy in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01695356 -
Ultraviolet and UV-Visible Light Photoprotection for the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278948 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05911698 -
Fractional co2 Laser Followed by Either Vitamin c or Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05656833 -
Combination Topical Cysteamine and Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser for Treatment of Facial Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04597203 -
Efficacy and Safety of Using Combination of 755-nm Picosecond Alexandrite Laser and 2% Hydroquinone Compared With 2% Hydroquinone Alone for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Split-face Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02138539 -
Evaluation of an Herbal-Based De-Pigmenting System
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01661556 -
Clinical Trial of Hydroquinone Versus Miconazol in Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01001624 -
Melanil in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03415685 -
Lutronic PicoPlus Exploratory Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04765930 -
Combined Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Q- Switched Nd:YAG Laser Alone in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04137263 -
Study Evaluating the Efficacy of DOSE Formulations in Treating Melasma and Cutaneous Signs of Aging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03686787 -
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Laser for Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05969587 -
Cysteamine Compared to Hydroquinone in Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00472966 -
Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Tri-Luma® Cream in Sequence With Glycolic Acid Peels for Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00500162 -
Comparison of Two Tri-Luma® Maintenance Regimens in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05884151 -
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05887219 -
Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03308370 -
Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 |