Melasma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Glycolic Acid and Salicylic Acid Peel Versus Glycolic Acid Peel Alone in the Treatment of Melasma: A Split Face Study
Verified date | June 2018 |
Source | Boston Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this pilot study is to conduct a controlled comparison of the efficacy and safety of a combination peel (glycolic acid and salicylic acid) as compared to glycolic acid peel alone in the treatment of melasma. Our primary outcome is objective improvement in pigmentation as evaluated using a colorimeter. Our secondary outcomes are subjective improvement using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) and Patient and Physician Global assessment, as well as assessment of treatment tolerability and patient satisfaction.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | February 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Female and males aged 18 or older - Subjects with melasma on both sides of the face (forehead or cheek). - Subjects in general good health - Female of childbearing age will be on a reliable form of contraception during the course of treatment other than oral contraceptive pills or hormonal intrauterine device. - Subjects must be willing to sign consent, answer questionnaires, comply with all clinical visits, and use sunscreen and sun-protection. - Subjects must be willing to not apply other treatment options for melasma during the course of the study Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects suffering from other pigmentation disorders. - Subjects with known allergy to any components of the peels - Subjects who have active uncontrolled disease to facial area (i.e acne). - Pregnant women, nursing mothers. - Subjects with history of abnormal scaring - Subjects who cannot communicate with investigators or who are unlikely to cooperate. - Subjects in a situation in which in the opinion of the investigators, may interfere with optimal participation in the study. - Subjects who have used chemical peels, microdermabrasion or facial laser treatments in the past 3 months. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Boston Medical Center |
Berson DS, Cohen JL, Rendon MI, Roberts WE, Starker I, Wang B. Clinical role and application of superficial chemical peels in today's practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(9):803-11. Review. — View Citation
Dominguez AR, Balkrishnan R, Ellzey AR, Pandya AG. Melasma in Latina patients: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a quality-of-life questionnaire in Spanish language. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jul;55(1):59-66. Epub 2006 May 2. — View Citation
Grimes PE. The safety and efficacy of salicylic acid chemical peels in darker racial-ethnic groups. Dermatol Surg. 1999 Jan;25(1):18-22. — View Citation
Kodali S, Guevara IL, Carrigan CR, Daulat S, Blanco G, Boker A, Hynan LS, Pandya AG. A prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial of salicylic acid peels in the treatment of melasma in Latin American women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Dec;63(6):1030-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.12.027. — View Citation
Lee HS, Kim IH. Salicylic acid peels for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Dec;29(12):1196-9; discussion 1199. — View Citation
Sarkar R, Kaur C, Bhalla M, Kanwar AJ. The combination of glycolic acid peels with a topical regimen in the treatment of melasma in dark-skinned patients: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Sep;28(9):828-32; discussion 832. — View Citation
Soliman MM, Ramadan SA, Bassiouny DA, Abdelmalek M. Combined trichloroacetic acid peel and topical ascorbic acid versus trichloroacetic acid peel alone in the treatment of melasma: a comparative study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007 Jun;6(2):89-94. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in pigmentation | Change in pigmentation using a colorimeter | Week 0, Week 7-8 (1-2 weeks following 4th peel), and Week 18 (12 weeks following 4th peel) | |
Secondary | Change in pigmentation score | Change in pigmentation using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) | Week 0, Week 7-8 (1-2 weeks following 4th peel), and Week 18 (12 weeks following 4th peel) | |
Secondary | Improvement of melasma | Improvement of melasma based on Patient and Physician Global assessment | Week 0 and Week 7-8 (1-2 weeks following 4th peel), and Week 18 (12 weeks following 4th peel) | |
Secondary | Adverse events assessment | Patient questionnaire to assess for any adverse events encountered | Week 7-8 (1-2 weeks following 4th peel) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05013801 -
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Facial Serum Q69 in Moderating the Appearance of Mild to Moderate Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06174545 -
Effectiveness and Safety of Pigment Solution Program (PSP) as Adjuvant Therapy in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01695356 -
Ultraviolet and UV-Visible Light Photoprotection for the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278948 -
Efficacy and Tolerability of Test Product Versus Cysteamine 5% in Treatment of Facial Epidermal Melasma
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05911698 -
Fractional co2 Laser Followed by Either Vitamin c or Tranexamic Acid in Treatment of Melasma.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05656833 -
Combination Topical Cysteamine and Fractional 1927nm Low-Powered Diode Laser for Treatment of Facial Melasma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04597203 -
Efficacy and Safety of Using Combination of 755-nm Picosecond Alexandrite Laser and 2% Hydroquinone Compared With 2% Hydroquinone Alone for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Split-face Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02138539 -
Evaluation of an Herbal-Based De-Pigmenting System
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01661556 -
Clinical Trial of Hydroquinone Versus Miconazol in Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01001624 -
Melanil in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03415685 -
Lutronic PicoPlus Exploratory Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04765930 -
Combined Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Q- Switched Nd:YAG Laser Alone in Melasma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04137263 -
Study Evaluating the Efficacy of DOSE Formulations in Treating Melasma and Cutaneous Signs of Aging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03686787 -
Oral Tranexamic Acid and Laser for Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05969587 -
Cysteamine Compared to Hydroquinone in Melasma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00472966 -
Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With Tri-Luma® Cream in Sequence With Glycolic Acid Peels for Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00500162 -
Comparison of Two Tri-Luma® Maintenance Regimens in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05884151 -
Comparison of Intralesional Tranexamic Acid and Platelets Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05887219 -
Comparison of Azelaic Acid 20 % Cream Versus Hydroquinone 4% Cream as an Adjuvant to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03308370 -
Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Melasma
|
Phase 3 |