View clinical trials related to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of adjunctive low-level light therapy (LLLT) to intense pulsed light (IPL) versus intense pulsed light (IPL) alone for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). The main question it aims to answer is does the adjunctive of low-level light therapy (LLLT) to intense pulsed light (IPL) provide more beneficial treatment effects than intense pulsed light (IPL) alone in treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) patients? Participants will be randomized into 2 groups: adjunctive low-level light therapy (LLLT) to intense pulsed light (IPL) group (ALLLT +IPL) and IPL alone group.
The use of photobiomodulation or low-level light therapy (LLLT) in the ophthalmic field stemmed from dermatology which has shown impact on skin blood flow and regeneration. There has been a rise in clinical interest with emerging evidence in the benefits of photobiomodulation in managing chronic inflammatory conditions such as dry eye disease including improvements in ocular discomfort symptoms, tear film stability and tear volume. Despite the observed clinical benefits, limited research has been done to compare photobiomodulation utilising different wavelengths, as most research on dry eye disease has focused on red wavelengths. It has been purported that blue wavelengths may disrupt microbial growth while red wavelengths stimulate energy production and hence increase heat in the affected tissues, although research into these differential impacts at the ocular surface and external eye has been limited. Hence, the aim of this exploratory clinical trial is to compare the impact of using LLLT incorporating red versus blue wavelengths on eyelid haemodynamics and microbiome, as well as conventional ocular surface measures of patients with dry eye disease and blepharitis (inflammation of the eyelids). Participants with dry eye disease, oil gland disruption and blepharitis will receive 3 treatments with these LLLT, each separted by 1 week apart, and followed up to 1 month after the final treatment session. Participants will be randomised to either of 3 groups: Red light only group, Red + Blue light group, or a sham treatment group.
This study aimed to assess the treatment outcome differences between a single, in-office bilateral treatment with the thermal pulsation system and twice-daily, 10-minute applications of the warm compress mask at home for 8 weeks.
Analysis the results of Dry eye analysis results and PET-CT imaging comprehensively
Renal anemia refers to anemia in which the absolute or relative production of erythropoietin (EPO) is insufficient due to various kidney diseases, and uremic toxins affect erythropoietin production and its lifespan. Common treatment drugs for renal anemia include erythropoietin EPO and Roxadustat (FG-4592). Medical history information was collected from patients with renal anemia who visited the ophthalmology department with dry eye symptoms. This study will help to determine the function and morphological characteristics of meibomian gland in patients with renal anemia
Summary: Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of eyelid treatment with the ILux®-MGD Treatment System in one session versus five sessions of mechanical meibomian gland expression (MMGE) in patients with moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods: Prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial comparing one session of the ILux® MGD Treatment System versus five sessions of MMGE in both eyes of 130 patients aged ≥18 years with OSDI scores ≥13, total MGS of 15 in the lower lid of each eye and NI-TBUT <10 s, who were randomized 1:1 to ILux® or MMGE.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the Eye Lipid Mobilizer (ELM) for the treatment of evaporative dry eye disease associated with meibomian gland dysfunction. The main questions aim to confirm that 1) the ELM can meet its intended use by validated patient reporting outcomes and 2) to confirm that the ELM device can be used safely by different users within a clinical environment as determined by review of any adverse events related to the use of the device.
The goal of this prospective, 24-week, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials to compare clinical efficacy and safety of RF and MGX with MGX alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. The main question it aims to answer is whether radiofrequency treatment and meibomian gland expression is more effective in improving tear breakup time, as measured using non-invasive video keratography, compared with meibomian gland expression alone, in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. Participants will be divided into two groups, one group will receive RF treatment followed with MGX and another will receive sham treatment with MGX.
The investigators will be evaluating the use of broadband light in Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the percentage of meibomian gland (MG) dropout in patients who are treated with additional meibomian gland expression (MGX) and in patients who are not. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Does additional MGX reverse MG dropout and support regeneration of MG? - Does additional MGX have better effect on tear film stability, MG function, lid morphology, tear cytokines than lid hygiene alone? Methods: Participants will be randomly assigned into MGX group as a treatment group and control group to assess study outcomes. The basic treatment of the 2 groups included lid hygiene once daily and artificial tear. The treatment duration lasts for 12 weeks. Patients will be examined at baseline, at 4-week, 8-week, 12-week visit for MG dropout percentage, MG morphology, lid margin abnormalities, Meibum assessment, tear film, tear cytokines and pain score to see if additional MGX can regenerate MG better than lid hygiene alone.