Measles Clinical Trial
Official title:
Measles Vaccination in Guinea-Bissau. Strategies to Reduce Disease Burden and Improve Child Survival
The specific aims are to examine in Guinea-Bissau:
- whether the standard titre Schwarz (SW) or standard-titre Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ) measles
vaccine will be the best vaccine strain for use in a routine one-dose measles
vaccination schedule and a two-dose measles vaccination schedule in terms of antibody
response, protection against measles and child survival, and
- whether the standard-titre Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ) vaccine will be suitable for use in a
very early two-dose schedule vaccinating at 4½ and 9 months of age
BACKGROUND:
Two dose schedules:
After the failure of the high-titre measles vaccine, which was to be administered at 6
months of age it was suggested to perform trials of early two-dose measles vaccination
schedules to lower the age of vaccination. The standard titre SW measles vaccine has been
shown to be associated with a non-specific beneficial effect on child mortality that cannot
be ascribed to the protection against measles. The two measles vaccines most commonly used
in the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) are the standard titre SW and the standard
titre EZ vaccine. Surprisingly, these two vaccines have never been compared in a randomised
trial with child mortality as end-point, and it is not clear which would be most suitable
for use in a two-dose vaccination schedule.
From 1995 to 2002, all children in the BHP study area were included in an early two-dose
measles vaccination trial from 6 months of age. The children were randomised to either a
one-dose group receiving an inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) at 6 months of age and a measles
vaccine at 9 months of age, or a two-dose group receiving two doses of measles vaccine at 6
and 9 months of age. For the first 6 months of the trial, the standard-titre EZ measles
vaccine was used, for the rest of the trial the standard-titre SW vaccine was used. Results
from the trial showed that an early two-dose schedule increased coverage considerably and
provided better protection against measles among infants than the recommended one-dose at 9
months of age schedule. The EZ and the SW vaccine were used in two different cohorts - so a
direct comparison was not possible, but the EZ vaccine seemed to boost a secondary immune
response better than the SW vaccine. Further, the SW vaccine was less able to induce a
protective level of antibodies when used from 6 months of age than the EZ vaccine. The
preliminary data that we have on long-term vaccine efficacy supports that the SW vaccine
might be less suitable than the EZ vaccine for use in very early measles vaccine schedules
(unpublished data). On the other hand, trials performed during the 1980's in Mexico and
Bangladesh have shown that administration of the standard-titre EZ vaccine to infants as
young as 4-6 months of age gave good seroconversion results.
The Global Measles Strategic Plan 2001-2005 developed by the WHO and UNICEF states that all
children should be guaranteed a second opportunity for measles vaccination either through
campaigns or routine immunisation. The best strategy for protection of infants living in
overcrowded urban African societies and who run a great risk of contracting measles before
the recommended age of immunisation, will probably be early vaccination followed by a second
vaccination later in childhood. If, in a vaccination campaign strategy, administration of
the first vaccine is postponed this could dramatically increase the measles incidence in
children below the age of vaccination. To this add that vaccination campaigns have not yet
been evaluated in Africa in terms of childhood mortality relative to the routine schedule.
Some children might get two, three or even more measles vaccines in an uncontrolled and not
necessarily beneficial manner. Thus finding the best schedule and vaccine strain for use in
a routine two-dose schedule seems a better approach for this region.
We thus propose to conduct a study comparing the standard-titre SW measles vaccine and the
standard-titre EZ measles vaccine in a one- or two-dose schedule providing the first dose at
9 months of age, and then randomising the children at 18 months of age to receive either an
additional dose of vaccine or nothing. The groups will be compared in terms of
seroconversion-rate, proportion with an non-protective antibody level, geometric mean titer
antibody level, vaccine efficacy, and child mortality. Further we plan to test the
standard-titre EZ vaccine in a very early two-dose schedule providing the first dose at 4½
months of age and the second dose at 9 months of age (see also non-specific effect of
vaccination).
It is likely that measles elimination vaccination campaigns will take place in the study
area during the trial. The date of vaccination and the type of measles vaccine used in such
campaigns will be noted, as well as simultaneous vitamin A supplementation; and the
information will be included in the final data-analyses.
Non-specific effect of vaccination:
The measles vaccine has in several community studies from different parts of the world been
shown to have a non-specific beneficial effect on child mortality. That means that the
protection against death mediated by the vaccine exceeds the disease specific effect, ie the
vaccine not only prevents deaths caused by measles, but also other deaths, presumably due to
a non-specific immune stimulation providing protection from other infections than measles.
For example, during the war in Guinea-Bissau that broke out on June 7, 1998, the population
fled and the health care system broke down. There was no routine vaccination for at least a
3 months period. Hence, when the war started there was a group of infants who had been
randomised to early SW measles vaccination at 6 months or IPV and who did not receive the
standard-titre SW measles vaccine at 9 month that they would otherwise have been given. This
natural experiment represents the first randomised study of the mortality effect of SW
measles vaccine. The mortality ratios for measles vaccinated children were 0.29 (0.08-1.03,
p=0.041) and 0.31 (0.10-0.94) over the first 3 and 7 months of the war.
Contrary to measles vaccination, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccination has been
associated with a negative effect on child mortality. Current studies indicate that the
negative effect of DTP may be neutralized by a subsequent measles vaccination. The design of
the proposed trial will allow us to test whether the negative effect of the DTP vaccine,
which is administered by the EPI-programme at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, can be reverted by
administration of a measles vaccine 4 weeks after the last DTP vaccination at around 4½
months of age.
Non-specific effects of vaccination are sex-specific. Girls benefit most from beneficial
non-specific effects, and suffer most from apparently harmful non-specific effects of
vaccination. Non-specific effects of measles vaccination may also show interaction with
season, the beneficial effect of measles vaccination being largest in the dry season
(unpublished), suggesting that some unknown immunological factors play a role. Season has a
large influence on health in West Africa, and both morbidity and mortality, as well as
immunologic parameters such as delayed-type hypersensitivity, T-cells, thymus size and
measles antibody levels which are associated with season.
We intend to investigate the interactions of sex and season with measles vaccination and
will assure that data on morbidity and immunologic parameters will be collected both in the
dry as well as in the rainy season.
Time table:
The study began in July 2003, and with a sample size of 5.755 and a possible 2.000 children
included per year, the inclusion period for the trial will be about 3 years.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04183114 -
Immunogenicity & Safety of Bio Farma's Measles-Rubella (MR) Vaccine in Indonesian Infants (Bridging Study)
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00092430 -
Study to Evaluate Frozen Versus Refrigerated MMRV (Combined Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella) Investigational Vaccine (V221-016)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02196285 -
Study to Evaluate Safety and Imunogenicity of Double Viral Vaccine (MR) for Measles and Rubella
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00384397 -
A Study of 2 Doses of Menactra®, a Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Toddlers
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00313950 -
Immunogenicity and Safety of Hepatitis A Vaccine Given at the Same Time of Measles, Mumps, Rubella Combined Vaccine
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00402831 -
ProQuad® Intramuscular vs Subcutaneous
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00560755 -
Safety Study of ProQuad® rHA in Infants (V221-037)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01878435 -
Randomized Controlled Trial of the Impact of Mobile Phone Delivered Reminders and Travel Subsidies to Improve Childhood Immunization Coverage Rates and Timeliness in Western Kenya
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01777529 -
Comparative Study of the Immunogenicity of MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) Single Dose and Multidose Presentations
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00258726 -
Immune Responses to Two Dose Varivax +/- MMR-II
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00109278 -
A Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Investigational Vaccine Trial (V205C-010)(COMPLETED)
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05771779 -
Co-administration Study of OCV, TCV and MR
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02880865 -
Immunogenicity and Safety of Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine When Given With Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01681992 -
Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Children in Their Second Year of Life
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00751348 -
Immunogenicity & Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella-varicella Vaccine 208136
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01702428 -
Consistency Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' MMR Vaccine (209762) (Priorix) Comparing Immunogenicity and Safety to Merck & Co., Inc.'s MMR Vaccine (M-M-R II), in Children 12 to 15 Months of Age
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00969436 -
Comparison of GSK Measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) Vaccine Versus PriorixTM
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00566527 -
Comparative Study of Immunogenicity and Safety of a 2-dose Regimen of ProQuad® Manufactured With rHA (V221-038)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00127010 -
Immunogenicity and Safety of a Combined Vaccine to Prevent Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Chickenpox Diseases
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00388440 -
Assess GSK Biologicals' MMR Vaccine (Priorix) When Given to Healthy Children at the Age of 12 to 18 Months in Singapore.
|
Phase 4 |