View clinical trials related to Measles.
Filter by:The study was designed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of DTap-IPV with DAPTACEL® + IPOL® as the 5th dose booster in children ≥ 4 to < 7 years of age in the US and Puerto Rico who were previously vaccinated with DAPTACEL® and/or Pentacel® vaccines only. Primary Objectives: - To compare the pertussis [Pertussis Toxoid (PT), Filamentous Haemagglutinin (FHA), Pertactin (PRN), and Fimbriae Types 2 and 3 (FIM)] booster responses and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) (as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) following DTap-IPV vaccination to those elicited following DAPTACEL® + IPOL® vaccination when administered as a 5th dose. - To compare the diphtheria and tetanus booster responses and GMCs (as measured by ELISA) following DTap-IPV vaccination with those elicited following DAPTACEL® + IPOL® vaccinations when administered as a 5th dose . - To compare the Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine booster responses (as measured by neutralizing assay) following DTap-IPV vaccination with those elicited following DAPTACEL® + IPOL® vaccinations. Observational Objectives: - To compare the polio (types 1, 2, and 3) geometric mean titers (GMTs) following DTap-IPV vaccination with those elicited following DAPTACEL® + IPOL® vaccinations. - To assess the safety of DTap-IPV vaccine or DAPTACEL® + IPOL® vaccine when administered as the fifth dose booster vaccine in participants previously vaccinated with DAPTACEL and/or Pentacel vaccines.
The national Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) in Guinea-Bissau focuses its efforts exclusively on children below 12 months of age; children who have reached 12 months of age are no longer entitled to vaccines through the EPI program. This has affected the measles vaccination coverage, approx. 30% of the children in the rural area do not receive measles vaccine (MV). Studies from the Bandim Health Project (BHP) have shown that MV has a profound impact on survival, reducing mortality by approximately 50% - far more than can be explained by prevention of measles deaths. Hence, MV seems to have non-specific beneficial effects on survival, and the current policy may have important consequences for overall child mortality. To test the implications of the current policy of only vaccinating children below 12 months of age, the investigators will conduct a cluster randomized trial, in which children will receive their vaccines according to the current national EPI policy (National policy) or receive MV regardless of age and whether some doses of MV may be lost (MV-for-all policy). The investigators hypothesise that among children enrolled after 12 months of age, mortality is 50% lower in children randomised to receive MV compared with children randomised to follow the national policy and not receive MV.
This study is designed to compare the immunogenicity of Japanese encephalitis chimeric virus vaccine (JE-CV) and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)vaccine when given together or when given at separate visits 6 weeks apart in toddlers aged 12 to 18 months. Primary objective: - To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the antibody responses in terms of seroconversion of the concomitant administration of JE-CV and MMR compared to the antibody responses after the single administration of JE-CV and MMR vaccine. Secondary objectives: - To describe the immune response to JE CV and MMR before and after one dose of JE CV and MMR vaccine, respectively. - To describe the safety of a single dose of JE-CV and MMR vaccine (given separately at a 6-week interval and the safety of the concomitant administration of JE-CV and MMR vaccine in all subjects up to 6 months after last vaccination.
A Study comparing three different doses of ProQuad to concomitant administration of M-M-R II and PUVV (Process Upgrade Varicella Vaccine) vaccines.
The study was conducted to determine if ProQuad may be used in place of the second dose of M-M-R II routinely given to children 4 to 6 years old who were previously immunized with M-M-R II and Varivax.
This study will compare three consistency lots of ProQuad to each other as well as to M-M-R II and Varivax, administered concomitantly at different injection sites, with respect to immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability.
This study will assess the safety and immunogenicity of ProQuad when administered concomitantly and nonconcomitantly with Tripedia and Comvax.
This study will compare Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella Vaccine (V221) and concomitant administration of Varivax and M-M-R II vaccines in healthy children.
The purpose of this study is to assess non-inferiority of two different vaccination regimens using GSK Biological's MMRV vaccine (two doses at 9 and 15 months) or Priorix™ (9 months) and one dose of MMRV vaccine (15 months) to the current standard of care which is Priorix™ administered at 9 months of age followed by concomitant administration of Priorix™ with Varilrix™ at 15 months of age in a measles endemic environment such as India.
This study will lay the foundation for determining the underlying reasons for lack of immunity to mumps that led to the 2006 mumps outbreak on college campuses in the Mid West, and it will assess the potential for similar outbreaks of measles and rubella. A total of 70 to 80 college students (age 18 to 22) on the Emory campus (or nearby college campuses or the community) will be assessed for antibodies to measles, mumps or rubella by drawing a one-time blood sample. Their medical records will be verified for documentation of immunization with MMR vaccine prior to enrollment in the study. If a study volunteer is found to not have MMR immunity, they will be offered an MMR-II vaccine. For this group, additional blood specimens will be obtained.