Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in BSSO

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The conventional saw compared with the piezo surgery in BSSO to evaluate cutting time, surgery duration, amount of bleeding. The purpose of this study was to answers following clinical questions: Is ultrasonic bonescalpel effective osteotomy like conventional bur in BSSO? and 2) Does it reduce operative parameter like bleeding, duration, lingual split pattern? 3) Does it reduce postoperative morbidity after BSSO.

Clinical Trial Description

The purpose of this study was to answers following clinical questions: 1) Is ultrasonic bonescalpel effective osteotomy like conventional bur in BSSO? 2) Does it reduce operative parameter like bleeding, duration, lingual split pattern? 3) Does it reduce postoperative morbidity after BSSO. Hypotheses of this study that ultrasonic bone scalpel can improve BSSO and its postoperative results due to strong cutting efficiency and soft tissue protective effect. Surgical procedure; After removing the full thickness mucoperiosteal flap lingula was localized. In ultrasonic device group, osteotomies one side of the mandible were performed unilaterally using an ultrasonic bone scalpel (BoneScalpel; Misonix, Farmingdale, NY) with a serrated standard blade. In conventional group, contralateral side mandibular osteotomies were performed with Lindeman and round bur. Groups are selected randomly. c- Follow up The predictor variable was the type of instrument used for bone osteotomy. The instruments were ultrasonic bone scalpel and Lindeman bur. The main outcome variable are the cutting time and NSD. All patients were followed for 6 months.The authors used the 3dMD imaging system (3dMD, Atlanta, GA) and 3dMD Vultus software to evaluate the amount of postoperative edema. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Maxillofacial Abnormalities

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06273189
Study type	Interventional
Source	TC Erciyes University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	December 15, 2018
Completion date	December 15, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06183853` - Evaluation of the Long-term Results of Extended Supra-basillary Genioplasty of the "Chin Wing" Type Without Bone Graft
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05713084` - Condylar Position Changes and TMJ Functions After BSSO Mandibular Setback, Low Medial Cut.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04035928` - Digital Design for Maxillofacial Prosthetics	N/A
Completed	`NCT01983436` - Impact of Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Postoperative Edema of the Face and the Neck After Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05151042` - Digital Occlusal Wafer Versus Waferless Distal Segment Repositioning for BSSO in Skeletal Mandibular Deformities	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02595307` - Improving Informed Consent for Cleft Palate Repair	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06263374` - Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Using Motor Imagery vs Sham After Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT04442009` - Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT04416386` - Vitamin C Level Effect in Orthognathic Surgery
Completed	`NCT01486069` - Mandibular Stability and Dentofacial Deformity	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05936476` - Impact of Maxillomandibular Deformities on Individuals' Nutritional Status
Completed	`NCT04813289` - Review of Anaesthetic Practice in Orthognathic Surgery
Completed	`NCT06281197` - Does Subspinal Le Fort I Osteotomy Affect the Nasal Airway Volume	N/A
Completed	`NCT04895319` - Adherence to Computer-assisted Maxillofacial Reconstructions
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05271383` - Study Evaluating the Performance and Safety of Global D Implants Indicated for Orthognathic Surgery
Completed	`NCT03357211` - Accuracy of Maxillary Repositioning During Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00285714` - 3D Imaging of Hard and Soft Tissue in Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT06454825` - Effects of Antiemetic Agents in Orthognathic Surgery Patients	Phase 4