Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT04778254 |
| Other study ID # |
38/10/2018 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
February 1, 2018 |
| Est. completion date |
August 30, 2019 |
Study information
| Verified date |
February 2021 |
| Source |
Cairo University |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Patients' satisfaction evaluation and radiographic evaluation of the terminal abutments of
attachment- retained maxillary obturators with metal framework versus milled PEEK framework
in the management of maxillectomy cases.
Description:
Eighteen participants were randomly divided into three parallel groups (n=6). Participants of
PEEK group received attachment-retained obturators with milled PEEK framework, metal group
received an attachment-retained obturator with metallic framework and conventional group
received conventional clasp-retained obturators with metallic framework (Control group).
Evaluation included radiographic evaluation and patients' satisfaction where two scales were
followed in this study, including "The Obturator Functioning Scale" and "The European
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35" using one way ANOVA test.