Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03757468
Other study ID # RCT_Milano-Genova
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2018
Est. completion date July 30, 2019

Study information

Verified date June 2019
Source University of Genova
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the present study is to investigate and analyze the perception of pain and function impairment during the first week of activation with two different palatal expansion screw to identify an effective pain prevention protocol.


Description:

Maxillary expansion with fixed appliance is a well-known and consolidated practice in clinical orthodontics but current findings of "evidence based dentistry" have not yet identified a better clinical expansion protocol. This issue is due both to the several expansion screws available on the market and to the different screw activation protocols, which could be grouped into rapid and slow, with several customizations. A recent systematic review has shown that both rapid and slow expansion protocols are clinically effective on the primary outcome, i.e. the resolution of the crossbite with a significant increase of skeletal transversal dimension in the maxillary transverse deficiency subjects. If the type of appliance based on its ability to solve the maxillary constriction is not any more the main selection criteria, the choice of the orthodontist should, therefore, be based on the timing and on a "patient-oriented" device, that minimizes the side effects, such as e.g. appliance breakages, functional impairments and pain.

In the orthodontic daily practice, the pain of the little patient is the most frequent symptom during treatment and is the one that most frightens/worries the child and the family. Literature shows that rapid maxillary expansion is, among the early orthodontic therapies, the one with the highest frequency of pain (up to 98%) as an adverse symptom reported by patients. The pain is statistically linked to the rapid expansion protocol (2/turn/day), during which, for each activation of the screw (0.2 or 0.25 mm) the force expressed can reach up to 10 pounds which acts in an orthopaedic manner on the palatine suture and the circummascellar sutures. Following this orthopedic action, a disorganized and highly vascularized connective tissue (inflammatory) is formed in palatine suture area, which becomes the main receptor of the pain perceived by the patient during the active maxillary expansion. In the literature the prevention and management of pain during palate expansion is a poorly analyzed topic, despite being a daily problem in orthodontic clinical practice and so the aim of the present study is to investigate and analyze the perception of pain and function impairment during the first week of activation with two different palatal expansion screw to identify an effective pain prevention protocol.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date July 30, 2019
Est. primary completion date July 30, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 5 Years to 14 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Subjects with transversal maxillary deficiency (with or without crossbite).

- Class I or Class II dental malocclusion with uni- or bilateral crossbite and/or constricted maxilla

- Before the pubertal peak (CVM 1-3).

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with previous orthodontic treatment

- Hypodontia in any quadrant excluding third molars

- Inadequate oral hygiene

- Craniofacial syndromes, or cleft lip or palate

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
orthodontic - maxillary expansion
After appliance placement, the screw (hyrax or leaf type) will be activated until overcorrection. Expansion will be considered adequate when the occlusal surface of the first maxillary palatal cusp contact the occlusal surface of the mandibular first molar facial cusp. When will be achieved, the expander will stay in place for 10 months.

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Università di Genova Genova GE
Italy Università di Milano Milano

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Genova University of Milan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Crossbite correction Clinical evaluation in vivo (binary outcome yes/no) 10 months
Primary Traversal maxillary deficiency correction Measured on digital dental casts (increase in mm of the intermolar and intercanine width) 10 months
Primary Pain during active expansion phase Pain reported on Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale analysis. Pain intensity was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale (Wong and Baker, 1988) from the first to the seventh day of the screw activation, reporting a daily registration in the evening. The Wong-Baker scale is a tool for self-assessment of pain intensity and is used in children from three years of age. The smiles range from the most smiling, corresponding to "no pain", to the one that cries, corresponding to "worst pain imaginable". Each face is also paired with a number, from 0 to 10, which coincides with the intensity of the pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome. 1 week
Primary Discomfort during active expansion phase Discomfort reported on a questionnaire 1 week
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02179593 - Effectiveness of SARPE With 3 and 2-Segment Technique: A Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04041388 - Maxillary Segment Tipping During Transpalatal Distraction N/A
Completed NCT05831722 - Changes in the Upper Airway Volume After Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Adults Using Pure Skeletal Anchorage
Recruiting NCT05773573 - Skeletal and Dental Changes With Hyrax-type Rapid Maxillary Expander Anchored to Permanent Versus Deciduous Molars N/A
Completed NCT03570528 - CT Analysis of the Anatomy of the Nasotracheal Intubation Pathway of Patients With Indication of Maxillary Advancement
Completed NCT04225637 - Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents N/A
Completed NCT00930124 - Cleft Orthognathic Surgery Versus Distraction Osteogenesis - Which is Better? Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05899530 - Dentoskeletal Changes Expansion Using Invisalign Versus Conventional Expander N/A
Completed NCT02350803 - Does Use of Rigid Fixation After Removing Distraction Osteogenesis Device Reduce the Relapse? Phase 2
Completed NCT03976609 - Three Dimensional Changes on Nasal Septum and Alveolar Cleft After Maxillary Expansion
Recruiting NCT04190953 - Upper Airway's Pressure Drop Analyses After Mandibular Advancement and Maxillary Expansion N/A
Completed NCT01770782 - Orthodontic Retention on the Maxillary Stability After SARME Using Laser Scanner N/A
Recruiting NCT05543460 - Miniscrew-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion With and Without Corticopuncture N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02711111 - Effect of Bone-anchored Protraction on Maxillary Growth in the Young Child N/A