Clinical Trials Logo

Maxillary Hypoplasia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Maxillary Hypoplasia.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05831722 Completed - Clinical trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Changes in the Upper Airway Volume After Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Adults Using Pure Skeletal Anchorage

Start date: November 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of bone-anchored rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in the volume of the right maxillary sinus, left maxillary sinus and nasal and maxillary sinus airway complex, through bone anchored maxillary expansion devices (BAME); in addition, the influence of gender and age in the volume changes will be also analyzed. Material and method: 18 patients between undergone RME treatment with a jackscrew based on 4 miniscrews which will be placed in the palate on both sides of the midpalatal suture. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans will be taken before and after suture palatine expansion and datasets will be uploaded into therapeutic digital planning software to measure the volume (mm3) of the right maxillary sinus, left maxillary sinus (mm3) and nasal and maxillary sinus airway complex (mm3). The airway volumes will be isolated after selecting the anatomical area in the axial, coronal and sagittal space plane and ensuring the air density measurement by reference points placement inside the selected area. Statistical analysis between preoperative and postoperative measurements will be performed using the statistical analysis of the t-test.

NCT ID: NCT04225637 Completed - Malocclusion Clinical Trials

Comparison Between Two Rates of Activation of Miniscrew-Supported Upper Jaw Expander in Adolescents

Start date: March 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Miniscrew-supported maxillary expanders provide advantages over conventional tooth-supported expanders. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding their activation protocol. The purpose of the clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the effects of slow and rapid activation rates of miniscrew-supported expanders on the skeletal changes, dento-alveolar changes and the pain experience.

NCT ID: NCT03976609 Completed - Clinical trials for Cleft Lip and Palate

Three Dimensional Changes on Nasal Septum and Alveolar Cleft After Maxillary Expansion

Start date: February 2009
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study evaluates, by means of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), the alterations in the nasal septum and alveolar cleft volume that occur in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients after rapid maxillary expansion(RME). 40 unilateral CLP patients (mean age, 11.1 ± 2.2 years) with transverse maxillary deficiency that underwent to RME will be evaluated in this investigation. CBCT images were taken prior to RME (T0) and after the removal of the expander (T1), for adequate secondary bone graft surgical planning. The scans will be used to analyze the effects on the nasal septum, anterior and posterior maxillary basal width (MBW) and alveolar cleft volume.

NCT ID: NCT03570528 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

CT Analysis of the Anatomy of the Nasotracheal Intubation Pathway of Patients With Indication of Maxillary Advancement

Start date: May 20, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Differences in nasotracheal intubation pathway anatomy will be observed between healthy patients and patients with maxillary retrusion. The results will clarify the nasotracheal intubation tube preference for these patients.

NCT ID: NCT02350803 Completed - Cleft Palate Clinical Trials

Does Use of Rigid Fixation After Removing Distraction Osteogenesis Device Reduce the Relapse?

Start date: February 2011
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

patients were enrolled by the inclusion criteria and were undergo lefort 1 maxillary osteotomy. after the latency phase the distraction was done in anterior- posterior vector. patients were divided by randomized allocation in 2 groups. in group 1 the distractor was removed after consolation phase, and in group 2 fixation devices were placed immediately after removal of distractors. data regarding relapse were analyzed by lateral cephalogram X-ray taken in 3 different phases of the trial. change of occlusal plane and the "A point" of the cephalometric analysis were determined as reference point of the study.

NCT ID: NCT01770782 Completed - Clinical trials for Maxillary Hypoplasia

Orthodontic Retention on the Maxillary Stability After SARME Using Laser Scanner

Start date: August 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the orthodontic retainer on transverse maxillary dental and skeletal stability after SARME.

NCT ID: NCT00930124 Completed - Clinical trials for Cleft Lip and Palate

Cleft Orthognathic Surgery Versus Distraction Osteogenesis - Which is Better?

Start date: June 2002
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Cleft lip and palate patients normally present with a sunken face due to collapse in the middle part of the face and inability of the upper and lower teeth to meet during chewing. This situation constitutes a serious aesthetic and mastication problem. A single surgical operation known as orthognathic surgery was traditionally performed to move the upper jaw forward to a more normal position and allow chewing function to be regained. However, due to scar tissue from the original surgical repair of the cleft palate, this procedure is known to be unstable causing bone to rapidly go back to its original position. A new concept of moving the upper jaw bone gradually by 1mm per day using a special device attached to the bone called distraction osteogenesis was established in 1996. Animal studies have shown that this technique can produce stable results with minimal relapse. The feasibility of correcting cleft deformities by gradual distraction has been confirmed by our own clinical studies. The aim of this study (which is the first of its kind) is to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study and compare the treatment outcomes of the current standard (orthognathic surgery) with distraction osteogenesis (gradual bone movement). The objectives focus on four aspects: morbidity, stability, speech function and psychological impact. The results from this study will clarify several clinical dilemmas in decision making when choosing whether to use orthognathic surgery or distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients. In addition, it will also inform our multidisciplinary research team to improve the total care of the cleft lip and palate patients. Gradual bone distraction of the midface in cleft palate patients is more stable, less detrimental to speech, and no more troublesome to the patient than conventional osteotomy and bone transposition (orthognathic surgery).