View clinical trials related to Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma.
Filter by:Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma (SMZL) is a well-defined low-grade B-cell lymphoma,considered as a rare neoplasm accounting for about 2% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) and represents for most cases of otherwise unclassifiable chronic lymphoid B-cell cluster of differentiation antigen 5 (CD5)-lymphoproliferative disorders. SMZL is characterized by an almost exclusive involvement of the spleen and bone marrow and in about 25% of cases the disease pursues an aggressive course and most patients die of lymphoma progression within 3-4 years. Retrospective studies have indicated that purine analogous achieved very high response rates in both naïve and pre-treated patients. Moreover, the introduction of the anti-cluster of differentiation antigen 20 (CD20) humanized antibody rituximab, either used alone or in combination with chemotherapy has been reported to be very effective in producing a rapid clearance of neoplastic cells.
This study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed or progressive Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma (MZBCL).
This is a study of CDX-1127, a therapy that targets the immune system and may act to promote anti-cancer effects. The study enrolls patients with hematologic cancers (certain leukemias and lymphomas), as well as patients with select types of solid tumors.
This is a multicenter open-label uncontrolled phase II study. There are no previous clinical data to estimate the expected response rate of everolimus in MALT lymphomas and in the other less common MZLs (i.e. nodal and splenic) refractory or relapsing after at least 1 prior systemic treatment (chemotherapy or immunotherapy). The primary objective of this study is to define the antitumor activity, in term of overall response rate (ORR), as sum of complete remissions (CR) and partial remissions (PR) of everolimus in relapsed or refractory marginal zone B-cell lymphomas. The secondary objectives of this study are to assess safety, as acute or long-term toxicity, response duration (RD) (time to relapse or progression) in responders and progression-free survival (PFS) (time to disease progression or death from any cause) in all patients.
Pre-clinical data and recently published clinical data suggest a synergistic effect between lenalidomide and dexamethasone. We hypothesize that a combination of lenalidomide-dexamethasone can overcome rituximab resistance. To determine the response rate to lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus rituximab therapy in subjects with recurrent small B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who have had lymphoma progression within 6 months of being treated with rituximab alone or with a rituximab-containing regimen, we propose initial treatment with both drugs for two 28-day treatment cycles (Part I). After response assessment following two cycles of lenalidomide-dexamethasone, patients will enter Part II of the study. In Part II, patients will receive lenalidomide-dexamethasone and rituximab to evaluate the potential reversal of rituximab resistance as measured by response to rituximab and progression-free survival following rituximab.