Evaluation of Customized V Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates of

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the study to evaluate the effect of customized V pattern plate fixation versus a conventional superior-inferior mini plates fixation of mandibular angle fracture on mouth opening and radio graphical parameters.

Clinical Trial Description

The mandibular angle is one of the most common sites for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. Moreover, mandibular angle fractures have the highest postoperative complications among all mandibular fractures, and the loosening of screws and fracturing of plates are main reasons for the complications.The most widely used treatment modality for mandibular angle fracture is the use of one miniplate fixation ,The other one uses two mini-plates, with a upper mini-plate fixed at the same place of previous treatment which corresponds to the tension band of the mandible, and the lower mini-plate fixed at the inferior border of the mandible which corresponds to the compression band of the mandible, however, based on recent experimental and clinical studies, the stability provided by the miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures has become a point of contention among surgeons .In order to decrease the need for plate removal, reduce the operative time and improve the stability of the fixation system, a customized V pattern plate design is an appropriate plate structure for fractured mandible using the minimum output values for stress of plate and displacement of bony segments to seek maximum reduction volume on an original plate .Patient satisfaction include: clinical parameters such are occlusion, pain, facial swelling, maximal mouth opening, sensory function, and surgical wound ,these should be evaluated postoperatively ,radio graphical evaluation is also an important parameter to assess adequate reduction of the fractured segments . ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03761524
Study type	Interventional
Source	Cairo University
Contact	Hiba O Saleh, Phd.student
Phone	00201010389391
Email	dr.hiba2013@yahoo.com
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	August 2019
Completion date	September 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04396054` - Comparison of Double Y-shaped Plates and Lag Screws in Fixation of Anterior Mandibular Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT05401994` - Screw Retained Arch Bar Versus Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06392204` - CAD/CAM Angle Fracture Reduction/Plate Guide and Customized 3D Grid Plate Versus Champy's Technique	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05647460` - Computer Guided Screw Holes Locating Guide and Custom-made Plates	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03714035` - Measurement of Mandibular Radio Morphometric Indices in Egyptian Population at Different Ages
Completed	`NCT04719325` - Herbert Screw vs Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fracture Treatment	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04443998` - Mandibular Fracture Reduction Using Bone Reduction Forceps	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03849898` - Patients 60 Years and Older Suffering From Mandibular Fractures Registry
Completed	`NCT03938584` - The Effect of Vitamin C on Wound Healing In Mandibular Fracture Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT04931056` - A Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study on Biomet Microfixation HTR PEKK (Midface), Facial & Mandibular Plates.
Completed	`NCT03494309` - Open Versus Closed Reduction of Mandibular Sub-Condylar Fractures	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06338982` - Fracture Pattern Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy With or Without Impacted Third Molars	N/A
Completed	`NCT05467618` - Comparison of Surgical Approaches in Reducing Mandibular Angle Fracture	N/A
Completed	`NCT04985461` - Minimally Invasive Dental Occlusion Ties
Completed	`NCT03075865` - A Cohort Study for Clinical Evaluation of OmniMax MMF System
Recruiting	`NCT03405389` - Focused Registry to Collect Clinical Data on the MatrixWAVE System
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03608891` - Patient Specific Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05444829` - Specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04283981` - Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT02081885` - Tricalcium Phosphate and Chitosan as Bone Regenerator Versus Autologous Graft in Surgery for Mandibular Fracture	Phase 3

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Evaluation of Customized V Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates of Mandibular Angle Fracture

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms