Mandible Fracture Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparative Study Evaluating Stability of Fracture Segments After Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fracture With 3d Strut Plate in Two Groups One With IMMF and Anthor Without IMMF ;Randomized Clinical Trial.
comparative study evaluating stability of fracture segments in mandibular angle fracture with 3d strut plate with or with out post operative IMMF.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 16 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 15 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with mandibular angle fracture with or witout other fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation in the mandible. - Patient over 15 years old age and both sexes were included in this study. - Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome. - Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia. - Patients with physical and psychological tolerance. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with comminuted fractures as it is not indicated for compression osteosynthesis like3d strut plate . - Patients with high risk systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. As uncontrolled diabetes mellitus has a negative impact on normal bone healing. - Patients with old and/or mal-union fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Farmand M, Dupoirieux L. [The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1992;93(6):353-7. French. — View Citation
Farmand M. [Experiences with the 3-D miniplate osteosynthesis in mandibular fractures]. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:85-7. German. — View Citation
Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;63(2):209-14. — View Citation
Jain MK, Manjunath KS, Bhagwan BK, Shah DK. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.083. Epub 2010 Apr 22. — View Citation
Kellman RM. Repair of mandibular fractures via compression plating and more traditional techniques: a comparison of results. Laryngoscope. 1984 Dec;94(12 Pt 1):1560-7. — View Citation
Sadhwani BS, Anchlia S. Conventional 2.0 mm miniplates versus 3-D plates in mandibular fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;3(2):154-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.119231. — View Citation
Saman M, Kadakia S, Ducic Y. Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation after open reduction of mandible fractures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):410-3. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543. — View Citation
Vineeth K, Lalitha RM, Prasad K, Ranganath K, Shwetha V, Singh J. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | stability of fracture segments. | post operative bimanual manipulation of the fracture segment. | 15 days post operative. | |
Secondary | inferior alveolar nerve injury. | measurment by:Neurosensory testing: patient will be asked if there was numbness without stimulus and on stroking the lower lip skin with afinger.The patient will be asked to grade the sensation present on an analog scale from 0 (no sensation) to 10 (completely normal sensation) | pre operative and 1 week post operative. | |
Secondary | Accuracy of fracture reduction. | Post operative. Through computed tomography by measuring inter ramus distance using lingula as reference to measure. | one week post operative. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03938584 -
The Effect of Vitamin C on Wound Healing In Mandibular Fracture Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03747666 -
Single Locking Miniplate and Two Non-locking Miniplates in the Management of Parasymphyseal Fracture
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04907552 -
Forensic Dental Age Estimation : Validation of Computed Tomography for Third Molar Demirjian's Staging
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05733221 -
3D Printed Models for Mandibular Fracture Repair
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01876979 -
Arch Bars vs. IMF (Intermaxillary Fixation) Screws: Cost Effectiveness
|
N/A | |
Approved for marketing |
NCT02181868 -
Comparison of Biodegradable and Titanium Fixation Systems in Mandibular Symphysis or Parasymphysis Solitary Fractures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03530891 -
Computer Guided Lag Screw Fixation Versus Conventional Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fractures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06243263 -
Postoperative Pain After Bupivacaine Supplementation in Mandibular Fracture Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05964140 -
The MANTRA Trial (MANdibular TRauma and Antibiotic Use)
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03839368 -
Stability of Angle Fracture Fixation With (K) Shaped Titanium Miniplates Versus Two Miniplates
|
N/A |