Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03340623
Other study ID # CHUB-venous coupler
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 1, 2017
Est. completion date May 28, 2018

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source Brugmann University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a retrospective study performed on medical records, in order to compare the number of venous thromboses, the surgery duration, the complications rate and the duration of anastomosis in breast reconstructive surgeries by the DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap) technique, with or without the use of a venous coupler.


Description:

Breast cancer is the most common and deadliest cancer among women in Belgium. Women with invasive cancer may be offered a total mastectomy with or without adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and with or without breast reconstruction. It is obvious that the loss of a breast can impact the self-image, hence the importance of informing the patient about the possibilities of breast reconstruction. Between 14 and 20% of women choose to resort to reconstruction.

Different types of breast reconstruction exist: prosthetic reconstruction, lipolifting and flap reconstruction (of large dorsal, gluteus maximus, rectus abdominis muscle and "DIEP").

DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap) presents numerous advantages. It consists in the use of a free cutaneo-greasy flap taken from the abdomen, without muscle removed. The abdominal skin has a similar appearance to the breast skin and, thanks to the presence of fat, the missing volume is replaced by a living tissue. Weakness of the abdominal wall is also avoided. However, it remains a surgical procedure with possible complications.

There are several steps in this surgery. The first is to dissect the abdominal flap by talking the skin and subcutaneous fat and isolating one or two branches of the lower epigastric artery and one or two veins. The donor area is then closed. The second step is to prepare the recipient area, ie dissect the artery that will be anastomosed with the lower deep epigastric artery.This artery can be the intern mammary artery, the thoraco-dorsal artery or more rarely the axillary artery. The third step consists of performing arterial and venous anastomoses and checking the quality of these.

Two microanastomoses must thus be performed: arterial and venous. The classic technique, the most used, is to suture the 2 veins. Alternatively, a coupler device can be used to perform the venous anastomosis.

It is therefore interesting to compare the classical method and the venous coupler method in terms of surgery duration, venous thrombosis and complications. If the coupler is proved effective, it could replace the manual suture.

Venous thrombosis is the main cause of flap failure. But surgery duration has also an impact on the complication rate, and the anastomosis duration corresponds to the time during which the flap is not perfused. It is thus necessary to keep it to a minimum in order to reduce the risk of flap loss.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date May 28, 2018
Est. primary completion date May 28, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 25 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Total mastectomy with mammary reconstruction by the DIEP technique

- Patients treated within the CHU Brugmann Hospital

- Patients treated between 01/01/2017 and 01/09/2017

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Venous coupler
A coupler can be used to perform a venous anastomosis. It is a double ring with pins on only one of its 2 faces. The technique consists in clamping the two veins, estimating the intima-to-intimal diameter of the vessels, choosing the coupler of the appropriate size, sliding the vein in the ring and evers the edges of the vessel to fix them on the pins, redo the same thing for the other vein and finally bring the two vessels together in order to clip them together.

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium CHU Brugmann Brussels

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Brugmann University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (3)

Camara O, Herrmann J, Egbe A, Koch I, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB. Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis. Anticancer Res. 2009 Jul;29(7):2827-30. — View Citation

Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Matros E, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ. Venous Thrombosis in Handsewn versus Coupled Venous Anastomoses in 857 Consecutive Breast Free Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Mar;32(3):178-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563737. Epub 2015 Sep 15. — View Citation

Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Acosta R. Venous coupler for free-flap anastomosis: outcomes of 1,000 cases. Anticancer Res. 2010 Apr;30(4):1293-4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Rate of venous thrombosis Rate of venous thrombosis Up to 1 week after mammary reconstruction surgery
Primary Surgery duration Duration of the mammary reconstruction surgery with the DIEP technique At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Primary Anastomosis duration Duration of the anastomosis during the mammary reconstruction surgery At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Age Patient age At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Body mass index Body mass index At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Tabagism Tabagism status (smoker/non smoker) At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Co-morbidity : diabetes Medical history of diabetes At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Co-morbidity : cardio-vascular disease Medical history of cardio-vascular disease At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Co-morbidity : medical history of venous thrombosis Medical history of venous thrombosis At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Immediate of differed reconstruction Reconstruction performed immediately after mastectomy or not At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Unilateral or Bilateral DIEP Unilateral or Bilateral DIEP At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.
Secondary Medical complications (yes/no) Medical complications within the grafted flap Up to one week after mammary reconstruction surgery
Secondary Type of cancer treatment (neo)adjuvant chemiotherapy or (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy At the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.

External Links