Clinical Trials Logo

Malocclusion, Angle Class II clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Malocclusion, Angle Class II.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05656898 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction

Start date: February 9, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

60 patients will be treated by extraction of maxillary first premolars by applying mini-screws between the maxillary second premolar and first molar as temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). They will be divided randomly into three groups in this trial. The prolonged duration of the treatment period can cause many side effects such as white spots, caries, periodontal diseases, and pain and discomfort. So many efforts have been made to reduce the treatment time. Many procedures have been introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement, which can category as surgical or non-surgical. Piezocision is a minimally invasive surgical method for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement and shortening treatment time. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is one of the physical acceleration methods that have contributed to decreasing treatment time.

NCT ID: NCT05655169 Completed - Angle Class II Clinical Trials

Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement

Start date: October 9, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Sixty patients who need extraction-based treatment of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth will be divided randomly into three groups: piezocision group, piezocision with low-level laser therapy group, and control group. In each group, after the levelling and alignment phase is completed, the rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") will be inserted, then after two weeks, the en masse retraction will be started via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side. For anchorage, mini implants will be inserted between the second premolars and the first molar on each side.

NCT ID: NCT05652244 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairment With Two Techniques of Retraction

Start date: January 13, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Thirty-eight patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: an en-masse retraction group and a two-step group. In each group, anterior teeth retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit in the en-masse retraction group, and TPA in the two-step's retraction group. The levels of pain, discomfort, and functional impairments will be self-reported using a validated questionnaire with a 4-points Likert scale.

NCT ID: NCT05647720 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

Effect of Maxillary Third Molar Extraction vs. Non-extraction on Distalization of First Molars in a Group of Adolescent Patients

Start date: February 28, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

There is a scarcity in literature regarding the influence of maxillary third molar on distalization . This study aimed to compare the influence of unerupted maxillary third molars and their extraction on the bilateral distalization of upper first molars using the infra-zygomatic gear distalizer

NCT ID: NCT05610150 Completed - Clinical trials for Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1

Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients

Start date: April 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pharyngeal airway changes after treatment with Myobrace and after treatment with Twinblock in developing skeletal Class II patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Is the efficacy of the twin-block Vs Myobrace appliances in the improvement of pharyngeal airway dimensions in adolescents having skeletal Class II malocclusion with retrognathic mandible utilizing sagittal pharyngeal airway area measurements.

NCT ID: NCT05592977 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

Effect of Bilateral Distalization of Upper First Molars in a Group of Patients After Extraction of Maxillary Second Molars

Start date: November 9, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

There is a scarcity in the current literature regarding such appliance and its effect on distalizing the first maxillary molar in absence of the second molar. Therefore, this study was made to evaluate the effect of bilateral distalization of upper first molars in a group of patients after extraction of maxillary second Molars using infra zygomatic mini implants.

NCT ID: NCT05555719 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study

Start date: November 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Fixed Functional Appliances comparisons in treatment of orthodontic class II malocclusion cases

NCT ID: NCT05466344 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One

Start date: June 15, 2020
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study will be directed to evaluate The effect of two different types of fixed functional appliances on the temporomandibular joint. Study design: Prospective randomized clinical study. Study setting and population: This study will be conducted on twenty orthodontic patients. The number of patients was dependent on a power study. Sample size calculation was based on the observed average effect size derived from previous article addressing "the effect of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD using miniplates for the treatment of Class II malocclusion

NCT ID: NCT05440526 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance

Start date: September 10, 2020
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

the objective of the current study is to compare the dentofacial effects of the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance Versus the dentally anchored Twin force bite corrector Appliance in Young Adult Class II Orthodontic Patients with retruded mandible.

NCT ID: NCT05418413 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion

The Use of an Esthetic Twin Block for Patients With Mandibular Retrusion

Start date: December 28, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This experimental study will evaluate the effect of an esthetic Twin-block appliance on the correction of class II malocclusion compared with the traditional Twin-block appliance. The study sample will consist of 50 patients with class II malocclusion. The sample will be allocated randomly into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. The traditional Twin-block appliance will be applied for the control group patients, while the esthetic Twin-block appliance will be applied for the experimental group patients. The dentoskeletal, soft tissue changes and esthetic and functional efficacy occurring after functional treatment will be assessed using cephalometric radiographs and profile photographs, pre and post-treatment, and a questionnaire. Changes for each group will be evaluated individually, and the two groups will be compared.