Mallet Finger Clinical Trial
Official title:
Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Volar, Dorsal, and Custom Thermoplastic Splinting in the Treatment of Acute Mallet Finger
In most cases of acute mallet finger, or avulsion of the extensor digitorum communis
terminal tendon from the distal phalanx, splinting is the treatment strategy employed. The
type of splint used to treat these injuries continues to be controversial. Custom splints
have recently been advocated though no strong comparative evidence is available.
The primary objective of this investigation was to show superiority of the custom
thermoplastic splint over both the dorsal and volar non-custom splints. The null hypothesis
was that a radiographic lag difference greater than 5 degrees would not be observed between
groups. The primary outcome measure is the residual extensor lag difference (compared to the
contralateral equivalent digit) at 12 weeks post-splinting.
In most cases of acute mallet finger, or avulsion of the extensor digitorum communis
terminal tendon from the distal phalanx, splinting is the treatment strategy employed. These
are considered Doyle I injuries- closed injuries with or without a small (<20%) avulsion
fragment. Absolute and relative indications for surgical intervention include an open
injury, or a bony mallet involving greater than 20% of the articular surface of the distal
phalanx with volar subluxation of the distal phalanx relative to the proximal phalanx. The
type of splint used to treat Doyle I mallet injuries continues to be controversial. Custom
splints have recently been advocated though no strong comparative evidence is available.
Objectives. The primary objective of this investigation was to show superiority of the
custom thermoplastic splint over both the dorsal and volar non-custom splints. The null
hypothesis was that a radiographic lag difference greater than 5 degrees would not be
observed between groups. The primary outcome measure is the residual extensor lag difference
(compared to the contralateral equivalent digit) at 12 weeks post-splinting. Week-12 was
chosen as a compromise between minimizing drop-out and the most distant timepoint reasonably
obtainable.
A novel outcome lag measurement was developed for this study, using the contralateral normal
digit as an internal control for establishing residual extensor lag. The residual extensor
lag difference was calculated with a single radiograph obtained with the beam directed
laterally at the affected digit and the contralateral equivalent digit (Figure 2). For
example, if the injured mallet finger was the right index finger, a single lateral
radiograph of the right and left index fingers on the same film was obtained. The patient
was instructed to maximally extend the both digits. This allowed for accurate determination
of extensor lag and comparison with the unaffected side . Adequacy of the lateral view was
assessed by considering the superimposition of the phalangeal condyles of the affected
digit. If they were not not superimposed, the radiograph was repeated.
A pilot study was performed to establish the most reliable technique for measuring residual
lag radiographically. Three measurement techniques were trialled by individuals with three
levels of training: resident, fellow, and consultant staff. A clearly defined technique was
employed using digital images only (Inteleviewer, Intelerad, Montreal, Canada). The
radiograph was enlarged on the viewing monitor so that the middle and distal phalanges
maximally filled the screen. The techniques used bisecting lines for the middle and distal
phalanges referencing either the volar cortex, dorsal cortex, or longitudinal axis of the
phalanges (Figure 3). Twenty-six lateral finger radiographs were blinded and assessed, and
then repeat measurements were obtained three weeks later. Inter-item correlation matrices
and intraobserver Pearson's correlations showed extremely high correlation values ranging
from 0.993 to 0.999 for the longitudinal axis technique. This pilot study established the
longitudinal axis technique as the most reliable in measuring residual radiographic lag.
Several secondary objectives were investigated. These included correlations between residual
lag and other factors, including patient age, Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores
(MHQ) and the development of complications; incidence of complications in each splinting
group; comparing radiographic to clinical extensor lag differences; and evaluating the
course of residual lag after splinting has been discontinued. Exploratory analyses were
performed as hypothesis generators only, including sub-group analysis.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01738919 -
Extension Block Technique Versus Splinting in Mallet Finger Fracture.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01388751 -
Mallet Finger Splinting Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00310570 -
Comparison of Splinting Interventions for Treating Mallet Finger Injuries
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05857683 -
Extension Pin Block vs Pin Orthosis-extension Block Pinning for Bonny Mallet Fractures
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03899363 -
Two Treatment for a Mallet Finger of Tendinous Origin
|
N/A |