Malignant Ureteral Obstruction Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Efficacy of Silicone-covered Metallic Ureteral Stent and Double-J Stent for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Based on Exploratory Research
Verified date | March 2013 |
Source | Asan Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Korea: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
Malignant ureteral obstruction often necessitates chronic urinary diversion and is
associated with high rates of failure with traditional double-J ureteral stents. To overcome
drawbacks of the double-J stent, recently, metallic stents have been used to manage for
palliative treatment in patients with ureteral obstruction associated with end stage
malignant disease. The success rates of metallic stents have been reported to be high and
the method proved to be useful in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction. In addition,
covered metallic stents have many advantages compared with bare metallic stents, such as
lower rate of tissue invasion and higher patency rate. However, there is little
investigation about comparison of clinical efficacy between covered-metallic stents and
double-J stents in malignant ureteral obstruction.
Therefore, investigators plan to perform a prospective randomized study to compare clinical
efficacy of silicone-covered metallic ureteral stent and double-J ureteral stent in patients
with malignant ureteral obstruction.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 78 |
Est. completion date | September 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 20 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 20-80 years 2. Malignant mid- to distal ureteral obstruction by abdominal or pelvic malignancy with overt hydronephrosis documented on CT scans 3. Expected life expectancy more than three months Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of unilateral nephrectomy or bladder reconstruction 2. History of kidney transplantation 3. History of severe allergy to contrast media 4. State of dialysis 5. Performance status - 3 or 4 on ECOG scale |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | Asan Medical Center | Seoul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Asan Medical Center |
Korea, Republic of,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | primary patency rate at 3-month F.U. | Confirmation of patency of the stents with USG and renal biochemistry, without additional intervention. | 3 month after stent deployment | No |
Secondary | Primary patency rate at 6- and 12-month F.U. | Confirmation of patency of the stents with USG and renal biochemistry, without additional intervention. Assessment of complications in two study groups. |
at 6 and 12 months after stent deployment | Yes |