Clinical Trials Logo

Malignant Melanoma clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Malignant Melanoma.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06332755 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Urothelial Carcinoma

Study to Evaluate LB-LR1109 for the Treatment of Solid Tumors

LB-LR1109
Start date: May 2024
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, dose escalation study, designed to determine the Maximum tolerated dose(MTD)/Recommended Phase 2 dose(RP2D) of LB-LR1109 and to evaluate safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics of LB-LR1109, and its impact on quality of life in participants with unresectable and metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer(NSCLC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma(HNSCC), renal cell carcinoma(RCC), urothelial carcinoma, or malignant melanoma and no available standard of care treatment options.

NCT ID: NCT05664139 Not yet recruiting - Liver Metastases Clinical Trials

Recombinant Human Adenovirus Type 5 Injection Combined With PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody and Nab-paclitaxel in the Treatment of Patients With Liver Metastases From Malignant Melanoma

Start date: February 2023
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study is the first to explore the efficacy and safety of recombinant human adenovirus type 5 injection combined with PD-1 monoclonal antibody and nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with liver metastases of melanoma, in order to provide a new method for the clinical treatment of melanoma. The model also provides reference and basis for other tumor treatments.

NCT ID: NCT05304546 Not yet recruiting - Metastatic Melanoma Clinical Trials

Overcoming Primary Resistance to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma

MK3475-C01
Start date: June 2023
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study will enroll metastatic (Stage IV or inoperable stage III) melanoma (MM) patients carrying a BRAF V600E/K mutation with confirmed primary resistance to standard of care immunotherapy (single agent PD-1 or a combination of CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade). Patients must be naïve to therapy with BRAF+MEK inhibitors, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.

NCT ID: NCT04924413 Not yet recruiting - Malignant Melanoma Clinical Trials

L-TIL Plus Tislelizumab as First-line Treatment in Advanced Malignant Melanoma

Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of liquid tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (L-TIL) combined with tislelizumab as the first-line treatment in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. This study plan to include stage III or IV unresectable or metastatic cutaneous or acral malignant melanoma patients, treat with L-TIL 4 cycles with each infusion (3 -10) x10*9/m2 cells, combined with tislelizumab 200mg, iv, Q3W. It is expected that 30 patients will be enrolled in this study.

NCT ID: NCT02938728 Not yet recruiting - Malignant Melanoma Clinical Trials

Definition of an Immune Signature Predictive of Anti-PD1 (Programmed Death-1) Antibody in the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma

PREDIMEL
Start date: November 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer. Major advances in metastatic melanoma treatment emerge from new immunotherapies that target specific immune inhibitory checkpoint receptors, mainly PD1 and CTLA-4, and overcome the exhaustion state of T cells. In this context, checkpoint inhibitors, such as Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies, mAb) and Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1 mAb), have demonstrated survival benefit in advanced melanoma patients. Anti-PD1 agents and combination of anti-PD1 and anti CTLA-4 have now been approved as first line therapy in melanoma. However, the predictive factors of response to these immunotherapies remain so far elusive. Recent studies provided consistent evidence that the immune infiltration could be tested as a biomarker for such immunotherapies. Moreover, the very recent concept of tumor neoantigens as biomarkers of response to anti-CTLA-4 mAb, and potentially also to anti-PD1 or combination therapies, is promising but needs to be further explored. In this context, the aim of our program is to identify and validate an immune signature predictive of anti-PD-1 benefit in the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. To this aim, tumor samples from 120 melanoma patients enrolled prospectively, treated with anti-PD1 mAb alone or combined with anti CTLA4, will be collected as well as the corresponding peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Tumor infiltration with immune cells will be characterized on paraffin embedded melanoma samples. The investigators will also perform whole-exome sequencing on tumors and matched PBMC samples. Our primary objective is to develop a combined immuno-signature based on an immuno-score (CD3, CD8, CD45RO…) to quantify the in situ immune populations with a dedicated image analysis system combined with the simultaneous detection of CD8-PD-1 and PD-L1 by immunofluorescence in baseline tumor samples. This will permit to predict 1-year survival of patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD1 and transfer in patient's care. Our secondary objectives are: 1/ To assess the interest of the detection of tissue-resident memory (TRM) T cells (CD8-CD103) as a predictive biomarker of response and survival at 1-year; 2/ To extend the panel of neoantigens published by Snyder et al to other neoantigens using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach on tumor samples obtained before therapy; 3/ To establish the prognostic value of this panel of neoantigens to predict tumor response to anti-PD1 and 1-year survival; 4/ To functionally validate the identified tumor neoantigens by stimulating patient PBMC with neoantigen peptides and measuring tumor-specific T-cell reactivity; 5/ To define the best marker and/or the best combination of markers predicting the overall response rate and the survival at 12 and 18 months; 6/ To attempt to establish a correlation between immuno-signature and neoepitopes and 7/ To transfer this immune signature in routine basis if validated. Thus, our project will integrate two complementary strategies to define a robust and reliable score system for predicting anti-PD1 targeting immunotherapy response. This study will provide a unique opportunity to validate various putative biomarkers in an integrated way that could help in determining the respective value of each isolated parameter and potentially lead to the definition of a composite biomarker. The identified immune signature would be of major interest in the field of cancer immunotherapy in order to select and manage patient treatment, and to consider the benefice or toxicities expected. It will also help to identify new target antigens of effective antitumoral immune responses and to understand the resistance mechanisms established by the tumor and its influence on the response to current immunotherapies.