View clinical trials related to Malaria, Falciparum.
Filter by:This is a phase I clinical study that aims to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a novel, escalating dose regimen of R21/Matrix-M™ in healthy, malaria-naïve adults.
The primary purpose of the study is to characterise the safety of GSK4024484 in healthy participants within a controlled pharmacokinetic (PK) range.
Malaria is a major public health problem. There were around 240 million cases of malaria and 627,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Most of the deaths are in children under five living in Africa. It is a major problem for those who live in affected areas and for travellers. There is a great need for a safe, effective malaria vaccine. This study is being done to evaluate an experimental malaria vaccine for its safety and also look at the body's immune response to the vaccine. The vaccine tested in this study is called and "RH5.1". This is given with an adjuvant called "Matrix-M". This is a substance to improve the body's response to a vaccination. The aim is to use the vaccines and adjuvant to help the body make an immune response against parts of the malaria parasite. This study will assess: 1. The safety of the vaccines in healthy participants. 2. The response of the human immune system to the vaccines. This will be achieved by giving participants three doses of the RH5.1 vaccines at two different dose levels (10 micrograms and 50 micrograms). One group will have 3 doses of 10 micrograms given at 0, 1 and 6 months whilst the other will receive 2 doses of 50 micrograms (at 1 and 2 months) followed by a 10 microgram dose at 6 months- known as a 'delayed fractional dose'. Blood tests and information about any symptoms will be performed/collected that occur after vaccination. Information from previous studies suggests that a delayed fractional dose improves the immune response to the vaccine, particularly in terms of the antibody response. Current prediction is that this improvement is due to the delay in dosing, rather than the reduction in dose, and this study will help to answer that. Having a vaccine at a single dose is important for efficient production and dosing for vaccines rolled out in national programs so being able to move away from 'delayed fractional dose' regimens to 'delayed final dose' regimens will be important for vaccine development.
Malaria is a major public health problem. There were around 240 million cases of malaria and 627,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. There is a great need for a safe, effective malaria vaccine and the team at University of Oxford is trying to make vaccine(s) which can prevent serious illness and death. This study is being done to assess an experimental malaria vaccine for its ability to prevent malaria illness. This is done using a 'blood-stage challenge model'. This is when volunteers are infected with malaria parasites using malaria-infected red blood cells. The vaccine we are testing in this part of the study is called "RH5.2-VLP". It is given with an adjuvant called "Matrix-M". This is a substance to improve the body's response to a vaccination. RH5.2-VLP is being tested for the first time in humans in this trial. The Matrix-M adjuvant has been given to tens of thousands of people, with no major concerns, such as illness. The aim is to use this vaccine and adjuvant to help the body make an immune response against parts of the malaria parasite. This study will assess: 1. The safety of the vaccine in healthy participants. 2. The response of the human immune system to the vaccine. 3. The ability of the vaccine to prevent malaria illness (Group 2 only). We will do this by giving healthy adult participants (aged 18-45) three of the vaccines and/or expose participants to malaria infection at the Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine (CCVTM), Churchill Hospital in Oxford. We will then do blood tests and collect information about any symptoms that occur after vaccination. There will be 19 to 54 visits, lasting between 3 months to 2 years and 2 months.
Seasonal Malaria Chemoprophylaxis (SMC) is a fundamental component of malaria control. The SMC program involves that sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) is given to children below the age of 5 years during the peak transmission season in areas of seasonal malaria transmission. Yet, its efficacy is increasingly below expectations. This study involves an Operational evaluation of a modified existing intervention and its implementation are prepared in direct interaction with the Ministry of Health (MoH) to tailor data collection to local needs. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. what are the reasons for the continued high infection rates in the SMC-targeted population; 2. what are the implications for transmission of sub-optimal SMC in children less than 5 years old; 3. can the impact of SMC be improved by including older age groups that would both expand the population that experiences direct chemoprophylactic benefits and concurrently reduce transmission to the wider community Researchers will: i) Compare SMC effectiveness as implemented by the national malaria control program and SMC implemented in a research context where all doses are directly observed. ii) Quantify the infectious reservoir and the contribution of different age groups to transmission with conventional SMC (<5 years) and extended SMC (<10 years) iii) Determine the impact of drug resistance and drug absorption on SMC efficacy iv) Understand social barriers and enablers interfering with SMC efficacy and how SMC uptake is related to health equity with special attention to gender inequalities. v) Quantify SMC efficacy decay under programmatic conditions and key drivers of this decay.
This study aims to confirm the efficacy, safety and tolerability of KLU156, a fixed dose combination of ganaplacide (KAF156) and a solid dispersion formulation of lumefantrine (lumefantrine-SDF), when administered once daily for three days in adults and children ≥ 5 kg body weight and ≥ 2 months of age suffering from uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria (with or without other Plasmodium spp. co-infection). In the Extension phase, the safety, tolerability and efficacy of repeated treatment with KLU156 will be assessed for a maximum of two years in patients who did not experience early treatment failure (ETF), who did not experience any study treatment-related SAE (Serious Adverse Event) previously and who gave informed consent to participate in the Extension phase.
This is a Phase IIb randomised controlled trial of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the blood-stage malaria vaccine candidates RH5.1 in Matrix-MTM and RH5.2-VLP in Matrix-MTM in infants aged 5-17 months in Burkina Faso
Two-arm, randomized, double-blinded and controlled clinical trial to first assess the safety and tolerability of the vaccine in a Phase 1b trial and proceed to assess its efficacy against clinical malaria in young children living in highly seasonal malaria areas of Mali
The purpose of the INTREPiD study is to compare 1st trimester screening for malaria parasites with a high-sensitivity malaria rapid diagnostic test followed by treatment of test-positive women with artemether-lumefantrine (AL) against usual antenatal care on a composite adverse pregnancy outcome including low birth weight, small for gestational age, preterm, fetal loss, or neonatal death.
Platform study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-malarial agents in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria