Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Treating Older Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Lymphoma Clinical Trial

Official title:

Phase III Trial of CHOP Versus CHOP and Chimeric Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in Older Patients With Diffuse Mixed, Diffuse Large Cell and Immunoblastic Large Cell Histology Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00003150
• Other study ID #: CDR0000065935
• Secondary ID: ECOG-E4494CLB-97
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: November 1, 1999
• Last updated: June 20, 2013
• Start date: December 1997
• Est. completion date: September 2006

Study information

• Verified date: August 2010
• Source: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known if combination chemotherapy is more effective with or without rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without rituximab in treating older patients who have non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Description:

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the efficacy of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with or without rituximab in older patients with diffuse mixed, diffuse large, or immunoblastic large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of B-cell lineage with respect to the response rate, time to treatment failure, toxicity, and survival. II. Compare the efficacy of maintenance therapy consisting of rituximab vs observation alone after initial therapy with respect to the time to treatment failure, duration of response, toxicity, and survival of this patient population. III. Determine if maintenance therapy with rituximab results in the conversion of any partial response to complete response.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. For the first randomization, patients are stratified according to the number of risk factors (0-1 vs 2-4). For the second randomization, in addition to the number of risk factors, patients are stratified according to objective response to initial induction therapy (partial response vs complete response) and induction therapy (CHOP vs CHOP and rituximab). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive CHOP chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, and vincristine IV on day 1 and oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients receive treatment as in arm I. Patients also receive rituximab IV on days -7,-3, 41, and 83. Patients who achieve complete response (CR) after 4 courses of CHOP and remain in CR after 6 courses of CHOP are further randomized to one of two arms. Arm I (Maintenance therapy): Patients receive rituximab IV weekly for 4 weeks. Courses repeat every 6 months for 2 years in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Arm II: Patients are observed. Patients who achieve partial response (PR) after 6 courses OR PR after 4 courses and then CR after 6 courses receive 2 additional courses of CHOP therapy. Patients are then also randomized to receive either maintenance therapy or observation as above. Patients with stable disease or disease progression are removed from the study. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 630 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 630
• Est. completion date: September 2006
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 60 Years and older

Eligibility

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven intermediate or high grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (other than Burkitt's, non-Burkitt's, undifferentiated, or lymphoblastic lymphoma) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma positive for CD19 and/or CD20 by slide-based immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry No mantle cell or follicular lymphoma Measurable disease, defined by at least one of the following: Physical examination Radiographic findings of at least 2 dimensions Bidimensional measurable defect or mass measuring at least 2 cm in diameter on radionuclide or CT scan Enlarged spleen extending at least 2 cm below the costal margin provided that there is no other likely explanation besides lymphomatous involvement Enlarged liver extending at least 5 cm below the costal margin along with biopsy-proven lymphomatous hepatic involvement No history of transformed lymphoma No known posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder No CNS involvement CALGB patients 60-65 years of age must not be eligible for any other study of higher priority A new classification scheme for adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been adopted by PDQ. The terminology of "indolent" or "aggressive" lymphoma will replace the former terminology of "low", "intermediate", or "high" grade lymphoma. However, this protocol uses the former terminology.

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: See Disease Characteristics 60 and over Performance status:

ECOG 0-3 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Absolute granulocyte count at least 1,500/mm3 (unless due to lymphoma) Platelet count greater than 100,000/mm3 (unless due to lymphoma) Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 3.0 mg/dL Renal: Creatinine less than 2.1 mg/dL OR Creatinine clearance at least 60 mL/min Cardiovascular: No active heart disease including congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the past 3 months, or symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia LVEF at least 45% if prior history of heart disease exists Other: HIV negative No other malignancy within the past 5 years except squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: See Disease Characteristics No prior biologic response modifier therapy No prior immunotherapy No prior rituximab Chemotherapy: No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy No concurrent dexrazoxane Endocrine therapy: Prior corticosteroids allowed Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy No prior radioimmunotherapy Surgery: Not specified

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Lymphoma
• Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Intervention

Biological:
• rituximab

Drug:
• CHOP regimen

• cyclophosphamide

• doxorubicin hydrochloride

• prednisone

• vincristine sulfate

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	MBCCOP - University of New Mexico HSC	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Albuquerque	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Ann Arbor	Ann Arbor	Michigan
United States	CCOP - Atlanta Regional	Atlanta	Georgia
United States	Hematology Oncology Associates	Atlantis	Florida
United States	CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium	Billings	Montana
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Biloxi	Biloxi	Mississippi
United States	Boston Medical Center	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	MBCCOP - University of Illinois at Chicago	Chicago	Illinois
United States	Barrett Cancer Center, The University Hospital	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Cincinnati	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	CCOP - Columbus	Columbus	Ohio
United States	Simmons Cancer Center - Dallas	Dallas	Texas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Dayton	Dayton	Ohio
United States	CCOP - Central Illinois	Decatur	Illinois
United States	University of Colorado Cancer Center	Denver	Colorado
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Denver	Denver	Colorado
United States	Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute	Detroit	Michigan
United States	Henry Ford Hospital	Detroit	Michigan
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Detroit	Detroit	Michigan
United States	Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope	Duarte	California
United States	CCOP - Duluth	Duluth	Minnesota
United States	Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center	Fort Gordon	Georgia
United States	Brooke Army Medical Center	Fort Sam Houston	Texas
United States	University of Texas Medical Branch	Galveston	Texas
United States	CCOP - Grand Rapids Clinical Oncology Program	Grand Rapids	Michigan
United States	CCOP - Greenville	Greenville	South Carolina
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Hines (Hines Junior VA Hospital)	Hines	Illinois
United States	Cancer Research Center of Hawaii	Honolulu	Hawaii
United States	University of Mississippi Medical Center	Jackson	Mississippi
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Jackson	Jackson	Mississippi
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Boston (Jamaica Plain)	Jamaica Plain	Massachusetts
United States	CCOP - Kansas City	Kansas City	Missouri
United States	University of Kansas Medical Center	Kansas City	Kansas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Kansas City	Kansas City	Missouri
United States	Keesler Medical Center - Keesler AFB	Keesler AFB	Mississippi
United States	CCOP - Dayton	Kettering	Ohio
United States	Albert B. Chandler Medical Center, University of Kentucky	Lexington	Kentucky
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Lexington	Lexington	Kentucky
United States	University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences	Little Rock	Arkansas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Little Rock (McClellan)	Little Rock	Arkansas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Long Beach	Long Beach	California
United States	Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA	Los Angeles	California
United States	USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital	Los Angeles	California
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - West Los Angeles	Los Angeles	California
United States	Texas Tech University Health Science Center	Lubbock	Texas
United States	Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic - Martinez	Martinez	California
United States	Loyola University Medical Center	Maywood	Illinois
United States	MBCCOP - Gulf Coast	Mobile	Alabama
United States	MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center	New Orleans	Louisiana
United States	Tulane University School of Medicine	New Orleans	Louisiana
United States	Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	CCOP - Bay Area Tumor Institute	Oakland	California
United States	University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Oklahoma City	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma
United States	Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center	Orange	California
United States	CCOP - Greater Phoenix	Phoenix	Arizona
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Phoenix (Hayden)	Phoenix	Arizona
United States	CCOP - Columbia River Program	Portland	Oregon
United States	Oregon Cancer Center	Portland	Oregon
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Portland	Portland	Oregon
United States	University of California Davis Medical Center	Sacramento	California
United States	CCOP - St. Louis-Cape Girardeau	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	St. Louis University Health Sciences Center	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	Huntsman Cancer Institute	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Salt Lake City	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio	San Antonio	Texas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Antonio (Murphy)	San Antonio	Texas
United States	CCOP - Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital	Santa Rosa	California
United States	CCOP - Virginia Mason Research Center	Seattle	Washington
United States	Swedish Cancer Institute	Seattle	Washington
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Seattle	Seattle	Washington
United States	Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - Shreveport	Shreveport	Louisiana
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Shreveport	Shreveport	Louisiana
United States	Providence Hospital - Southfield	Southfield	Michigan
United States	CCOP - Upstate Carolina	Spartanburg	South Carolina
United States	CCOP - Cancer Research for the Ozarks	Springfield	Missouri
United States	CCOP - Northwest	Tacoma	Washington
United States	Madigan Army Medical Center	Tacoma	Washington
United States	CCOP - Scott and White Hospital	Temple	Texas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Temple	Temple	Texas
United States	CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program	Toledo	Ohio
United States	David Grant Medical Center	Travis Air Force Base	California
United States	Arizona Cancer Center	Tucson	Arizona
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Tucson	Tucson	Arizona
United States	CCOP - Wichita	Wichita	Kansas
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Wichita	Wichita	Kansas
United States	CCOP - Southeast Cancer Control Consortium	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group	Cancer and Leukemia Group B, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Southwest Oncology Group

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Advani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, et al.: Prognostic indices in older DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP: an analysis of the U.S. Intergroup study (E4494, CALGB 9793). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-813, 2006.

Advani RH, Chen H, Habermann TM, Morrison VA, Weller EA, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Gascoyne RD, Horning SJ; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Cancer and Leukemia Group B; Southwest Oncology Group. Comparison of conventional prognostic indices in patients — View Citation

Aurora V, Li S, Horning SJ, et al.: Prognostic significance of p53/p21 expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a correlative study of E4494. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-8038, 450s, 2007.

Habermann TM, Weller E, Morrison VA, et al.: Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP with or without maintenance rituximab in patients 60 years of age or older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an update. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-127, 2004.

Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB, Dakhil SR, Woda B, Fisher RI, Peterson BA, Horning SJ. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin On — View Citation

Morrison V, Weller E, Habermann T, et al.: Dose intensity of CHOP alone or with rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients >60 years of age: an analysis of the intergroup trial ( CALGB 9793, ECOG-SWOG 4494). [Abstract] Ann Oncol 16 (Su

Morrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, et al.: Maintenance rituximab (MR) compared to observation (OBS) after R-CHOP or CHOP in older patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): an Intergroup E4494/C9793 update. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (S

Morrison VA, Weller EA, Habermann TM, et al.: Patterns of growth factor (GF) usage and febrile neutropenia (FN) among older patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: an intergroup experience (CALGB 9793, ECOG-S

Winter JN, Li S, Aurora V, Variakojis D, Nelson B, Krajewska M, Zhang L, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Weller EA, Melnick A, Reed JC, Horning SJ, Gascoyne RD. Expression of p21 protein predicts — View Citation

Winter JN, Weller EA, Horning SJ, Krajewska M, Variakojis D, Habermann TM, Fisher RI, Kurtin PJ, Macon WR, Chhanabhai M, Felgar RE, Hsi ED, Medeiros LJ, Weick JK, Reed JC, Gascoyne RD. Prognostic significance of Bcl-6 protein expression in DLBCL treated w — View Citation