Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Pilot Study Of Pd 0332991 In Patients With Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Verified date | October 2015 |
Source | Pfizer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a pilot study evaluating tumor activity using Positron Emission Tomography, which is also known as a "PET scan". This study will assess the safety of using PD-0332991 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 17 |
Est. completion date | March 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 99 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically documented MCL. - Must have received at least one prior therapy. - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =1. - Adequate organ function as outlined in the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: - Major surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic therapy within 4 weeks of study enrollment. - Prior radiation therapy to >25% of the bone marrow (whole pelvis is 25%). - Uncontrolled brain metastases, spinal cord compression, carcinomatous meningitis, or leptomeningeal disease. |
Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Brigham & Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York |
United States | New York Presbyterian Hospital | New York | New York |
United States | Weill Medical College of Cornell University - New York Presbyterian Hospital | New York | New York |
United States | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pfizer |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluoro-L-thymidine Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram [kg]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in [(18)F]-FLT-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Correlation Coefficient Between Change From Baseline in Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) and in Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram [kg]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in [(18)F]-FDG-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Change From Baseline in Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram [kg]). Change from baseline in SUVmax was assessed using [(18)F]-FLT-PET and [(18)F]-FDG-PET techniques. | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PET response was defined as complete response (CR) = mean SUVmax same as of background; partial response (PR) = mean SUVmax less than (<) 75 percent (%) of baseline; progressive disease (PD) = mean SUVmax greater than (>) 125% of baseline; stable disease (SD) = mean SUVmax greater than or equal to (>=) 75% of baseline and mean SUVmax less than or equal to (<=) 125% of baseline. PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as >50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for PFS | No |
Primary | Correlation Between Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response and Objective Response (OR) | OR: CR= disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms and biochemical abnormalities, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspiration; PR= dominant nodes decreased by >50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions regressed by >50% in SPD, no new sites of disease; SD= response Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 for PET response; Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) for OR |
No |
|
Primary | Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Baseline | Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. | Baseline | No |
Primary | Phosphorylated Retinoblastoma (Phospho-Rb) Percent Positive Cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. | Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Ki-67 Composite Score at Baseline | Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). | Baseline | No |
Primary | Ki-67 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). | Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Baseline | Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). | Baseline | No |
Primary | Cyclin D1 Composite Score at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity). | Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities | Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: Hematology (Hemoglobin [<0.8*lower limit of normal {LLN}], Platelets [<0.5*LLN/ >1.75*upper limit of normal {ULN}], White blood cells [<0.6*LLN/ >1.5*ULN], Lymphocytes, Neutrophils [<0.8*LLN/ >1.2*ULN], Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes [>1.2*ULN]); Liver Function (Total bilirubin [>1.5*ULN], Aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Alkaline phosphatase [>0.3*ULN], Total protein, Albumin [<0.8*LLN/ >1.2*ULN]); Renal Function (Blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine [>1.3*ULN], Uric acid [>1.2*ULN]); Electrolytes (sodium [<0.95*LLN/ >1.05*ULN], potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium [<0.9*LLN/ >1.1*ULN], phosphate [<0.8*LLN/ >1.2*ULN]); Other (Glucose [<0.6*LLN/ >1.5*ULN]). | Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | Yes |
Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by Severity | AE = any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity was assessed as: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe) = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, and requiring systemic medication therapy/other treatment; Grade 4 (Life-threatening) = events causing participant to be in imminent danger of death; Grade 5 (Death) = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category. | Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | Yes |
Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The events which were considered treatment-related by sponsor and/or investigator were reported. | Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study medication | Yes |
Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as >50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. PFS= (first event date minus the first dose date plus 1) divided by 30.44. | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | OR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration; Partial response (PR)= dominant nodes decreased by >50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by >50% in SPD, no new sites of disease. | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | No |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DR) | Time in months from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed, to objective tumor progression (PD) or death due to any cause. DR= (date of first documentation of PD or death, minus the date of first CR or PR plus 1) divided by 30.44. CR= disappearance of all detectable clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms present before start of therapy and biochemical abnormalities attributable to disease, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeated bone marrow aspiration. PR= dominant nodes decreased by >50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions in organs (spleen/liver) regressed by >50% in SPD, no new sites of disease. PD= >50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease. | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | No |
Secondary | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | Time in months from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression (PD). TTP= (last known progression-free date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. PD was defined as greater than 50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease. | Screening until tumor progression or death, assessed on Day 1 of every alternate cycle starting from Cycle 1 up to end of treatment (Day 609) or early withdrawal (if not completed during last 6 weeks) | No |
Secondary | Correlation Coefficient Between Plasma PD 0332991 Concentration and Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 | Plasma PD 0332991 concentration at Cycle 1 Day 21 was analyzed. Change from baseline in biomarkers (Ki-67 composite score, Cyclin D1 composite score, phospho-Rb positive cells) and SUVmax (FLT-PET SUVmax, FDG-PET SUVmax) at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. Correlation between PD 0332991 concentration and change in biomarkers (concentration versus Ki-67, concentration versus Cyclin, and concentration versus phospho-Rb) and SUVmax (concentration versus FLT-PET SUVmax, concentration versus FDG-PET SUVmax) was then assessed. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. | Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 21 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05024045 -
Study of Oral LOXO-338 in Patients With Advanced Blood Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03567876 -
Rituximab, Bendamustine and Cytarabine Followed by Venetoclax in High Risk Elderly Patients With MCL
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02413489 -
An Efficacy and Safety Proof of Concept Study of Daratumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, and Follicular Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04913103 -
Study of PV in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients With R/R MCL
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00514722 -
Pilot Study of Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in Adult Patient With Advanced Hematopoietic Malignancies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03682796 -
Study of TRPH-222 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06136351 -
A Study of the Zanubrutinib Given in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in (Elderly or TP53 Alterations or Chemotherapy Intolerance) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02440685 -
A Phase 1/2 Study To Evaluate ASN002 In Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma And Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00025662 -
Selective T-Cell Depletion to Reduce GVHD (Patients) Receiving Stem Cell Tx to Treat Leukemia, Lymphoma or MDS
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06427213 -
This is a Phase II, Open-label, Multicentre Study of Zanubrutinib-containing Regimens in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04849416 -
A Study of LOXO-305 in Chinese Participants With Blood Cancer (Including Lymphoma and Chronic Leukemia)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03425591 -
A Study of Ibrutinib in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle-cell Lymphoma in Routine Clinical Practice
|
||
Completed |
NCT02257242 -
Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo®), Bendamustine and Rituximab-Phase I Trial in Indolent B-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03910283 -
Leveraging Mindsets to Improve Health & Wellbeing in Patients With Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00861510 -
A Pilot Study of the Safety and Activity of Escalating Doses of ON 01910.Na in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, and Related Lymphoid Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04735471 -
A Phase 1 Study of ADI-001 in B Cell Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05431179 -
A Study of Zilovertamab and Ibrutinib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02669017 -
Study of ADCT-402 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Lineage Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL)
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT00871546 -
SCH 727965 in Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma or B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (Study P04715)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03647124 -
A Study to Evaluate the Relationship of Lenalidomide With Tumor Flare Reaction and High Tumor Burden in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
|