Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02933294
Other study ID # ZLYXXTCX-201509
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received September 23, 2016
Last updated October 12, 2016
Start date May 2015
Est. completion date December 2020

Study information

Verified date October 2016
Source Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Contact Juwei Mu, MD
Phone 8610-87788495
Email mujuwei@cicams.ac.cn
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Ministry of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. At present, surgical resection is still the standard treatment for early stage lung cancer. Triportal thoracoscopic lung resection is a routine surgically procedure for early stage lung cancer while uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection is developing rapidly in recent years. Although uniportal VATS pulmonary resection has been proven to be effective in preventing postoperative morbidities, there is still no ample evidences to demonstrate that uniportal VATS pulmonary resection is equal or superior to traditional triportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. The purpose of this multicenter randomized controlled trial study is to compare the uniportal VATS with traditional triportal VATS pulmonary resection in postoperative complications, long-term survival, lymph node dissection and local recurrence.


Description:

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world,especially in China, where the mortality ranked first in malignant tumors whether for males or females. At present, VATS (Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) lobectomy is still the "gold standard" for the treatment of lung cancer. Triportal thoracoscopic lung resection is a routine surgically procedure for early stage lung cancer while uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection is developing rapidly in recent years. Retrospective study in recent years showed that the postoperative complication rate is similar between uniportal thoracoscopic surgery and triportal thoracoscopic surgery. Meanwhile, the incision is more pleasing, the inflammatory response may be milder and the hospitalization time may be shorter in the uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. But until now there is no result of the randomized controlled study on the effectiveness and the prognosis between uniportal thoracoscopic surgery and triportal thoracoscopic surgery to support this conclusion. The objective of this multicenter randomized controlled trial study is to compare the postoperative complications, long-term survival, local recurrence, other perioperative variables such as conversion rate, blood loss, lymph nodes retrieved and postoperative hospital stay between the triportal VATS pulmonary resection and uniportal VATS pulmonary resection on early stage lung cancer.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 356
Est. completion date December 2020
Est. primary completion date April 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- age=18 years;

- cT1- 2N0-1M0 diagnosed by chest CT, PET-CT before operation;

- No severe comorbidity, can tolerate anesthesia;

- ECOG PS scores=2;

- The patients sign informed consents by themselves.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Inability to tolerance of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia;

- ECOG PS scores>2;

- Severe comorbidities including: Angina occurs in 3 months, uncontrolled hypertension, Congestive heart failure, a history of myocardial infarction in 6 months before admission, severe arrhythmia, severe liver, kidney or other metabolic diseases.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Triportal pulmonary resection surgery
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Uniportal pulmonary resection surgery
Triportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
China Beijing Chest Hospital Beijing
China Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing
China Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Guangzhou Guangdong
China Fudan University Cancer Center Shanghai

Sponsors (5)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing Chest Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Fudan University, Sun Yat-sen University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative respiratory complications These respiratory complications involve respiratory distress or failure after the operation with continuation of mechanical ventilation, pulmonary atelectasis requiring sputum suction by bronchoscopy, pneumonia requiring specific antibiotics confirmed by thoracic X-ray or CT scan of the thorax and a positive sputum culture, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. 30 days after surgery Yes
Secondary Blood loss blood loss during the surgery Intraoperation Yes
Secondary Lymph node dissection During the surgery, lymph node dissection were performed. The number of removed lymph-nodes were recorded according to the postoperative pathological diagnosis, and the stations of the lymph node were recorded according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Lymph Node Map. Intraoperation Yes
Secondary Long term survival five-year survival rates after surgery 5 year Yes
Secondary Local recurrence three-year local recurrence rate after surgery 3 years Yes
Secondary Conversion rate conversion to thoracotomy during surgery Intraoperation Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03357094 - Pulmonary Ventilation/Perfusion Imaging for the Prediction of Postoperative Residual Pulmonary Function N/A
Recruiting NCT05543954 - 68Ga-FAPI-RGD PET/CT Imaging in the Lung Cancer Patients Early Phase 1
Completed NCT01114958 - Pilot Study of Intra-Arterial Cisplatin With IV Thiosulfate in Patients With Lung Cancer or Lung Metastases Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06004440 - Real World Registry for Use of the Ion Endoluminal System
Completed NCT02926768 - Phase I/II Study of CK-101 in NSCLC Patients and Other Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02907606 - Urinary Circulating Tumor DNA Detection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02514512 - Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Using Realtime Dynamic Multileaf Collimator (MLC) Adaptation And Radiofrequency Tracking N/A
Completed NCT02531737 - Nintedanib (Vargatef®) Plus Docetaxel in Second Line of Treatment in Patients With Lung Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT02334007 - Extended Low-Molecular Weight Heparin VTE Prophylaxis in Thoracic Surgery Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT02284633 - Blood Sample Monitoring of Patients With EGFR Mutated Lung Cancer
Completed NCT02106143 - RejuvenAirâ„¢ System Lobectomy Safety and Histology Study N/A
Completed NCT01933789 - Improving Communication About Serious Illness N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT01687647 - Sputum Cytometry Analysis in Lung Cancer Screening After Professional Asbestos Exposure Phase 3
Completed NCT00385177 - Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of SN2310 Injectable Emulsion in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT00351962 - Phase I/II Study of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Medically Inoperable NSCLC or Metastatic Lung Tumours N/A
Terminated NCT00356525 - Chemotherapy Treatment in Re-occurring Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) After Previous Chemotherapy and Surgical Removal of the NSCLC Tumor Phase 2
Completed NCT00243685 - Chemotherapy Drug Sensitivity Microculture (MiCK) Assay for Apoptosis Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00129844 - Study of Motexafin Gadolinium (MGd) for Second Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT00090701 - A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the GARFT Inhibitor in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT01789229 - Establishment of a Tumor Bank for Tissue Samples