Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03133754
Other study ID # DP-PEEP
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 10, 2017
Est. completion date February 2019

Study information

Verified date October 2018
Source Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to compared the effects in driving pressure of an open-lung strategy with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated to best driving pressure (DP) after a RM versus the recommended protective PEEP of 5 cmH2O without a recruitment manuever in non-obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date February 2019
Est. primary completion date December 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Non-obese patients scheduled for cardiac surgery (CABG and valve replacement)

Exclusion Criteria:

- i) age <18yr or >80yr, ii) pregnancy or breast-feeding status, and iii) patients with previous known respiratory disease, iv) Body mass index >35 kg/m2, v) emergency surgery and vi) hemodynamic instability at entry (need of vasopressors or ionotropes at entry or a ventricular assist device.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
DP-PEEP
PEEP titration trial for the lowest DP after the alveolar recruitment maneuver
RM-5
Fixed standard PEEP after the alveolar recruitment maneuver

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Carlos Ferrando Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (5)

Borges DL, Nina VJ, Costa Mde A, Baldez TE, Santos NP, Lima IM, Figuerêdo ED, Lula JL. Effects of different PEEP levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Jul-Sep;28(3):380-5. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130058. — View Citation

Costa Leme A, Hajjar LA, Volpe MS, Fukushima JT, De Santis Santiago RR, Osawa EA, Pinheiro de Almeida J, Gerent AM, Franco RA, Zanetti Feltrim MI, Nozawa E, de Moraes Coimbra VR, de Moraes Ianotti R, Hashizume CS, Kalil Filho R, Auler JO Jr, Jatene FB, Gomes Galas FR, Amato MB. Effect of Intensive vs Moderate Alveolar Recruitment Strategies Added to Lung-Protective Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1422-1432. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2297. — View Citation

Ferrando C, Soro M, Canet J, Unzueta MC, Suárez F, Librero J, Peiró S, Llombart A, Delgado C, León I, Rovira L, Ramasco F, Granell M, Aldecoa C, Diaz O, Balust J, Garutti I, de la Matta M, Pensado A, Gonzalez R, Durán ME, Gallego L, Del Valle SG, Redondo FJ, Diaz P, Pestaña D, Rodríguez A, Aguirre J, García JM, García J, Espinosa E, Charco P, Navarro J, Rodríguez C, Tusman G, Belda FJ; iPROVE investigators (Appendices 1 and 2). Rationale and study design for an individualized perioperative open lung ventilatory strategy (iPROVE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 27;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0694-1. — View Citation

Reis Miranda D, Gommers D, Struijs A, Dekker R, Mekel J, Feelders R, Lachmann B, Bogers AJ. Ventilation according to the open lung concept attenuates pulmonary inflammatory response in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Dec;28(6):889-95. Epub 2005 Nov 3. — View Citation

Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Biehl M, Binnekade JM, Canet J, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, Hedenstierna G, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Putensen C, Ranieri M, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Schmid W, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):66-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000706. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary driving pressure The driving pressure is a physiological ventilatory parameter measured as platteau pressure minus PEEP. This parameter may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications intraoperative
Secondary Postoperative pulmonary complications The most frequent postoperative pulmonary complications will be recorded (acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, atelectasis, need of ventilatory support, acute respiratory distress syndrome) 72 first postoperative hours
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02919267 - Physiology of Lung Collapse Under One-Lung Ventilation: Underlying Mechanisms N/A
Completed NCT04506203 - The Accuracy of Pediatric Air Test as a Non-invasive Atelectasis Diagnostic Tool N/A
Completed NCT03314519 - Lung Ultrasonography vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Aiding Lung Collapse in Patient Using Double Lumen Tube N/A
Completed NCT03155711 - HFNC for Induction During Bariatric Surgery Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT03369483 - Abdominal Pressure Assessment Following Open Abdominal Surgery
Recruiting NCT04235231 - The Effect of Lateral Tilt on Ventilation Distribution in Lungs Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography N/A
Completed NCT02798133 - Open Lung Approach Versus Standard Protective Strategies N/A
Completed NCT03142997 - Spontaneous Ventilation Versus Controlled Ventilation on Lung Atelectasis in Children. N/A