View clinical trials related to Lumbar Radiculopathy.
Filter by:This study aims to assess the effectiveness of perioperative pain neuroscience education (PPNE) in patients who are at risk for unfavorable outcome following surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Although most of these surgeries are successful, 23-28% of patients report chronic pain and disability following surgery. Many preoperative factors are associated with an unfavorable surgical outcome, including maladaptive cognitive and emotional factors. Yet, current preoperative education, which focuses on anatomy and biomechanics of the lumbar spine, is ineffective in changing those maladaptive factors. PPNE was introduced as an innovative therapy that addresses modifiable risk factors in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. PPNE reconceptualizes pain, informs patients about their pain development and is well established for improving maladaptive cognitions in several chronic pain-populations. Hence, we hypothesize that PPNE will be more effective than perioperative biomedical education in improving postsurgical quality of life, pain, analgesic use and return to work in patients at risk for unfavorable outcome following surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. First, a multicentric randomized controlled trial will compare the therapy effects of PPNE to perioperative biomedical education in these at-risk patients. Next, the mediating role of changes in maladaptive cognitions, such as fear of movement and pain catastrophizing, on the therapy effect of PPNE will be investigated.
Opioid overuse is a widespread public health crisis in the United States with increasing rates of addiction and overdose deaths from prescription opioids. Reducing the need for opiate analgesics in the post-operative setting has become a high priority in minimizing long-term opioid use in surgical patients. This study will serve to demonstrate the efficacy of the addition of regional analgesic techniques in reducing post-operative opioid requirements in patients undergoing common lumbar spinal surgical procedures.
Lumbar discectomy (i.e. surgically removing a hernia) is frequently performed in Belgium to treat lumbar radiculopathy. Every year >12,000 interventions are performed with variable long-term results. The treatment success of this procedure varies and up to 41% of the patients report post-operative persistent pain complaints, and consequently suffer from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Chronic complaints in FBSS following lumbar discectomy are usually treated with symptomatic interventions (including painkillers, neuromodulation, etc), rather than from a biopsychosocial perspective. In order to develop a focused and effective treatment strategy, it is crucial to first gain insight into how persons with persistent complaints after lumbar discectomy differ from those without persistent symptoms. Different known contributing factors entail type of surgery, muscle and psychosocial impairments. Although in scientific and clinical literature it is assumed that dysfunctional pain processing also plays an important mechanistic role in FBSS, there is a lack of research to support this. However, this knowledge is crucial to depict the full mechanistic picture of pain generators and potentiators in FBSS. Therefore, we will examine whether residual complaints persisting following lumbar discectomy can be accounted for by underlying dysfunctional pain processing and whether a clinical classification algorithm can be used to identify the predominant pain mechanism in these patients.
This study examines the impact of virtual reality compared to sedation (midazolam and/or fentanyl) and no intervention on pain experienced from an epidural steroid injection (ESI). The intervention group (who receive virtual reality as a distraction modality) is compared to a sedation group and a control group.
Pulsed radiofrequency applied to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is an interventional treatment alternative in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain that does not respond to conservative methods. Under intermittent fluoroscopic imaging, the location of the ganglion can be determined by administering contrast media. We consider that determining the localization of the ganglion with this method during pulse radiofrequency application can shorten the procedure time. In this way, we believe that it would help the correct application of the procedure.
This study will provide evidence about how much dose of decompression more effective for the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy. As this hypothesis has no evidence about the dosage of decompression in literature till now.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a ubiquitous musculoskeletal (MSK) complaint that often presents as a chronic and difficult to treat condition. Lumbosacral radiculopathy/radiculitis (LR) or "sciatica" is a common secondary condition that can last well beyond the expected time frame after treatment with physical therapy, oral anti-inflammatory medications, local steroidal injections, and surgery. Challenges in the treatment of LR indicate that persistent pain may have evolved from mechanical to neuropathic. Previous research has shown that, in addition to the aforementioned treatments, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is effective in limiting self-reported pain in patients with CLBP and neurogenic conditions such as fibromyalgia. This study proposes a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effects of a newer mindfulness program, Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE), on self-reported pain, physical function, quality of life (QoL), depression symptoms, trait mindfulness, reinterpretation of pain, and surface electromyography (sEMG) findings in patients with LR. METHODS: Participants will be recruited from the Portland, OR metro area. Upon screening and recruitment, participants will receive a battery of questionnaires collecting demographic, self-reported pain, physical function, QoL, depression symptoms, mindfulness, and reinterpretation of pain data. Participants will also undergo sEMG to identify neurological abnormalities that can be characterized diagnostically. Upon enrollment, participants will be randomized to either the mindfulness-based intervention group (MBI), MORE; or the control group, treatment as usual (TAU), for 8 weeks. Self-reported pain measures and sEMG studies will be conducted again at eight weeks post randomization. HYPOTHESES: Primarily, investigators hypothesize that MORE will be effective in improving self-reported pain, physical function, QoL, depression symptoms, mindfulness, and reinterpretation of pain scores after eight weeks of mindfulness training. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that those individuals with abnormal sEMG findings at baseline will have improved sEMG findings at their eight-week follow-up visit. ANALYSIS PLAN: Changes in self-reported pain, physical function, QoL, depression symptoms, trait mindfulness, and reinterpretation of pain will be analyzed using descriptive statistics as well as ANCOVA. Regression will also be used to evaluate the dose-response relationship between all outcome measures and time spent in mindfulness practice for the intervention group. Finally, ANCOVA will be used to evaluate the relationship between pain and physical function and sEMG findings.
ELDOA is the most beneficial intervention treating for lumbar pathologies such as radiculopathy. This study was a randomized control trial in which data was collected from Riphah Rehabilitation and Research Centre and Pakistan Railway Hospital-IIMCT. Purposive sampling technique was used for data collection. Research data was recorded by using prescribed validated questionnaire, NPRS and ODI. After taking consent from patients, patients were divided randomly in two groups through lottery method. Group A was treated with ELDOA and mobilization, group B was treated with only mobilization. It was observed that both groups showed improvement but ELDOA group showed more significant results.
The study will be done to evaluate the effectiveness of Lumbar Spinal Decompression in patients with acute vs chronic lumbar radiculopathy. Study design will be Randomized control trial and sample size will be 30. Duration of study was of 6 month, convenient sampling was done. Data will be collected from DHQ Daska were randomly allocated in three groups via lottery method, baseline assessment was done. Patients of both gender (male and female) from 18 to 50 years with lumbar radiculopathy diagnosed through X-ray and physical examination will be included. Patients with systemic soft tissue and bony diseases will be excluded. Intervention duration of 4 weeks, 3 sessions in a week. Decompression of lumbar spine will be given once in a week. Whole procedure of treatment program will given to patients and written informed consent will be taken. Basic tools will be Visual analog scale (VAS), SLR, ODI, Inclinometer. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 21
The aim of this study was to find out the effects of active versus passive lower extremity neuralmobilizations combined with lumbar traction and lumbar mobilization in patients with lumbarradiculopathy. The study was conducted in shalamar hospital Lahore and was completed within 6 month of time duration. Sample size of twenty four patient consists of both male and female aged between 45 years to 65 years. Each group contain 12 patients. Group A received active neural mobilizations whereas group B received passive neural mobilization along with lumber traction and mobilization. Patients were re assessed at the end of 6 weeks through SLR , NPRS and ODI.