Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Medial Branch Blocks vs. Intra-articular Injections: Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation Using Diagnostic Injections.
Background: Facet interventions are the second most commonly performed procedure in pain
clinics throughout the U.S, including in the military. Currently, there is no clear consensus
regarding whether intra-articular (IA) blocks or medial branch blocks (facet joint nerve;
MBB) are the best way to diagnose and treat facetogenic pain, or even whether or not to
perform diagnostic/ prognostic blocks.
Hypothesis: IA blocks will provide better relief than MBB, but MBB may better select patients
for radiofrequency denervation.
Purpose: Objective 1: Determine which "prognostic" block is the best predictor for RF
denervation outcome; Objective 2: To determine whether adding steroids to IA or MBB may
provide intermediate or long-term benefit to a subset of individuals.
Research Design: Randomized, comparative-effectiveness study
Methodology /Technical Approach: A total of 225 patients with non-radicular chronic low back
pain (LBP) with suspected facetogenic etiology will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of
3 groups:
Group 1 will receive IA blocks with steroids and LA Group 2 will receive MBB with steroids
and LA Group 3 will receive MBB with only saline
Those individuals who obtain significant (≥ 50% in groups 1 and 2,3) but temporary (<
1-month) relief will undergo radiofrequency (RF) denervation at their 1-month follow-up. In
group 3, those patients who do not experience pain relief at 1-month will undergo RF
denervation regardless of the pain relief they experience (as many practitioners in the
military and civilian practices do without diagnostic blocks).1-3 Participants in Groups 1
and 2 who experience prolonged relief from their diagnostic/ therapeutic blocks with LA and
steroids will not undergo RF denervation until their pain returns. Those individuals who
experience prolonged relief lasting > 6 months will be given the option of repeating the
diagnostic/ therapeutic block. In Groups 1, 2 and 3 patients who experience prolonged relief
from the diagnostic blocks, follow-up visits will be at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months after
the block, or until their pain relief wears off. In those who undergo denervation based on a
positive block, follow-ups will be performed 1, 3 and 6-months after the denervation provided
they continue to experience significant (> 50%) relief at each follow-up. Those individuals
who fail to experience significant relief after denervation will be unblinded and exit the
study per protocol.
Two hundred and twenty five patients with suspected lumbar facet arthropathy scheduled to
undergo diagnostic lumbar facet blocks will be enrolled in this study at WRNMMC and
randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio into one of 3 groups. Group 1 will receive IA blocks with
steroids and LA, group 2 will receive MBB with steroids and LA, and group 3 will receive MBB
with only saline. Subjects and (but not injecting physicians) evaluators will be blinded
throughout their participation in the study as to treatment allocation. The nerves and joints
to be blocked will be determined by physical exam (i.e. the location of paraspinal
tenderness), and radiological findings.
Group 1: The 80 patients in this group will undergo IA blocks under fluoroscopic guidance
with 0.5 mL solutions containing a 50:50 mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mg
depomethylprednisolone (called "steroid"). In all cases, correct positioning will be
confirmed by the administration of contrast. After the block, they will be administered a
pain diary to maintain for the next 6 hours. In accordance with standard care, a positive
response will be > 50% pain relief lasting at least 3 hours. Patients who have not undergone
physical therapy (PT) will be sent for PT . The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those
individuals with a positive block whose pain has returned to baseline, RF denervation will be
performed at the same levels done for the diagnostic block. Once adequate sensory stimulation
is confirmed, a 1 mL mixture containing equal amounts of 2% lidocaine 0.5 mL) and 20 mg
depo-methylprednisolone (0.5 mL) will be injected to reduce procedure-related pain and
decrease the incidence of neuritis. For those patients who have persistent (> 50%) pain
relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at 3-months. If their pain relief
persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months post-procedure. Pain relief in
this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated with repeat IA injections if the patient so
desires, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF denervation.
Patients who experience a negative diagnostic block, or who fail to obtain significant pain
relief at any follow-up from their RF denervation, will exit the study per protocol to pursue
alternative treatments
Group 2: The 80 patients in this group will undergo MBB blocks under fluoroscopic guidance
with 0.5 mL solutions containing a 50:50 mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mg of
depo-methylprednisolone steroid. After the block, they will be administered a pain diary to
maintain for the next 6 hours. Patients who have not undergone physical therapy will be sent
for a PT program. The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those individuals who do not
experience significant pain relief, RF denervation will be performed at the same levels done
for the diagnostic block, as described in 'Group 1'. For those patients who have persistent
(> 50%) pain relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at 3-months. If
their pain relief persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months
post-procedure. Pain relief in this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated with repeat
MBB if they desire, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF
denervation. Patients who experience a negative diagnostic block, or who fail to obtain
significant pain relief at any follow-up from their RF denervation, will exit the study per
protocol to pursue alternative treatments.
Group 3: The 40 patients in this group will undergo IA blocks under fluoroscopic guidance
with 0.5 mL of normal saline. After the block, they will be administered a pain diary to
maintain for the next 6 hours. Patients who have not undergone physical therapy will be sent
for PT. The first follow-up will be at 1-month. In those individuals who fail to experience
significant pain relief at this time point, RF denervation will be performed at the same
levels done for the diagnostic block, as described in 'Group 1'. For those patients who have
persistent (> 50%) pain relief at 1-month, they will return for their 2nd follow-up at
3-months. If their pain relief persists at this point, their final follow-up will be 6-months
post-procedure. Pain relief from the block in this group that lasts > 6 months can be treated
with repeat MBB, while that which persists for < 6 months will be treated with RF
denervation. In patients who do not experience significant pain relief at their 1-month
follow-up, RF denervation will be performed. Those who experience a negative outcome from RF
denervation, will exit the study per protocol to pursue alternative treatments.
During follow visits, subjects who have difficulty arranging for transportation can elect to
conduct their follow-up visits over the telephone, via fax, or by e-mail, whichever is most
convenient.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|