Clinical Trials Logo

Lumbar Facet Joint Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Lumbar Facet Joint Pain.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05137652 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

One-Needle Vs Three-Needle Radiofrequency in Low Back Pain Due to Facet Joint Arthritis

Start date: March 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Failure of RFA has been attributed to technical failure of coagulating the nerve or coagulation of a minimal section of the nerve, allowing for early reinnervation. Consequently, increasing the success rate and duration of relief may require techniques that increase the likelihood of successful nerve ablation over a relevant distance by maximizing lesion size.

NCT ID: NCT01590004 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Facet Joint Pain

Technical Description of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branches for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Pain

Start date: August 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This study aims to develop a technical description of lumbar medial branch ablation using the LumbarCool system. The procedure uses cooled radiofrequency (cooled-RF) technology in treating patients with diagnosed lumbar facet joint pain.

NCT ID: NCT01300715 Recruiting - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

An Alternative Technique for Lumbar Medial Branch Radiofrequency: Comparison With the Empirical Technique

MBRF LBP
Start date: November 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In spite that variable techniques for lumbar MBRF exists, the tunnel vision technique is widely recommended for exact radiofrequency needle placement. However, this method uses the concept of a steep caudocephalad axial tilt of the fluoroscopy beam, which result in unusual appearance of vertebral structures and a long distance from skin to the target site. In our institution, therefore, the investigators have used a modified method that is easy and safe to place RF needle parallel to the lumbar medial branch in oblique fluoroscopic view. Accordingly, our objectives were to evaluate our modified technique for lumbar MBRF, comparing with the tunnel vision technique, and additionally to assess complications with respect to these two techniques.