Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03335657
Other study ID # W81XWH-16-2-0060
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 18, 2018
Est. completion date July 18, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2023
Source Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of the CBPT study is to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire and physical performance tests. Secondary outcomes include pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty.


Description:

Following extremity injury, referral (and direct access) to physical therapy (PT) is considered standard of care. And, while PT strategies are commonly impairment focused, clinicians across multiple subspecialties of physical therapy recognize the importance of addressing pain and pain-related psychosocial factors as strong predictors of chronic pain as well as long-term physical and psychological disability. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have documented positive influence on psychosocial factors in patients with chronic pain. CBT-based self-management programs have also demonstrated improvement in patient outcomes and the adoption of a physically active lifestyle, as well as improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy, in various populations with chronic conditions. These evidence-based CBT and self-management strategies provide the basis for the study intervention. The proposed project will conduct a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program in patients at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Central hypothesis is that delivery of CBPT by physical therapists over the telephone will improve outcomes, through reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement and improvement in pain self-efficacy. The investigators propose a large, rigorous evaluation of the CBPT program in patients with lower extremity trauma with the goal of engaging civilians and service members in their own care and improving pain and functional outcomes. Specific Aim 1 To determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include physical performance tests, pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty. Specific Aim 2 To determine whether changes in the intermediary outcomes of pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and self-efficacy at 6 months are associated with improvement in outcomes 12 months after hospital discharge. Specific Aim 3 To determine whether subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from the CBPT program. Specific Aim 4 To examine the value of CBPT relative to Education using Markov decision-analysis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 633
Est. completion date July 18, 2021
Est. primary completion date June 18, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: 1. Ages 18-60 yrs inclusive 2. Patients with at least one acute orthopaedic injury to the lower extremities or pelvis/acetabulum (determination based on information available at the time of enrollment). 3. Injury resulting from a moderate to high energy force (e.g. motor vehicle or motorcycle crash, fall > 10 ft, gun shot, blunt trauma) 4. Patients receiving operative fixation for one or more acute orthopaedic injuries at a participating hospital. Patients should be recruited at the time of primary injury, not revision or complication surgery 5. Presence of psychosocial risk factors for poor outcomes (defined as a score greater than 30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) or a score equal to or greater than 39 on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) or a score equal to or less than 40 on the Pain Self Efficacy Scale (PSES)). These risk factors will be identified between 2 and 8 weeks after hospital discharge. Exclusion criteria: 1. Non-English speaking 2. Patients who are unable to start the program within 12 weeks of discharge from hospital because of multiple readmission, admission to a rehabilitation facility, or other extenuating circumstances 3. Patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as evidenced by intracranial hemorrhage present on admission CT. If no CT performed, patient assumed not to have moderate or severe TBI 4. Patients with major amputations of the upper or lower extremities (great toe, thumb, or proximal to the wrist or ankle) 5. Patients who require a Legally Authorized Representative (as defined by an inability to answer the "Evaluation of Give Consent" questions) 6. Patients non-ambulatory pre-injury or due to an associated spinal cord injury 7. History of dementia or Alzheimer's disease based on medical record or patient self-report 8. History of neurological disorder, disease or event, resulting in prior cognitive and/or physical impairment, such as prior TBI or stroke based on medical record or patient self-report 9. Presence of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder based on medical record or patient self-report 10. Current alcohol and/or drug addiction based on medical record or patient self-report 11. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up expected (e.g. patients who are incarcerated or homeless)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
CBPT
The CBPT program focuses on a patient-oriented cognitive-behavioral self-management approach to improve physical function and reduce pain, through reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement and increases in self-efficacy.
Education Treatment
Participants receiving the education control arm are receiving a placebo intervention to control for the attention of the interventionist. They will receive standardized educational material addressing recovery from orthopaedic trauma.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center Baltimore Maryland
United States Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda Maryland
United States Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte North Carolina
United States The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School Houston Texas
United States Methodist Hospital Indianapolis Indiana
United States Vanderbilt Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
United States San Antonio Military Medical Center San Antonio Texas
United States Florida Orthopaedic Institute Tampa Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Return to work/duty Measured through the rate of return to work/duty 6 months post discharge 6 months
Primary Physical Function- self-reported capability to carry out activities Physical Function measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Physical Function (short form) domain to assess one's ability to carry out activities that require a combination of skills, often within a social context. This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 40 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 8 and it represents the better outcome. 12 months
Secondary Pain_ self reported Pain measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Pain Intensity (short form) Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge. This tool has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 15 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 3 and it represents the better outcome. 12 months
Secondary General Health General Health measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ General Health Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge.This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 50 which represents the better outcome. The lowest possible score is 10 and it represents the worse outcome. 12 months
Secondary Physical Function- Balance and Agility Balance and Agility measured through the Four Square Step test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. 12 months
Secondary Physical Function- Mobility and Power Mobility and Power measured through the Timed Stair Ascent test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. 12 months
Secondary Physical Function-Leg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility Leg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility measured through the Sit to Stand Five Times 12 months
Secondary Physical Function- Gait Speed Gait Speed measured through 10-Meter Walk test. Each individual will have time scores 12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03408925 - Preventing Injury in Elite Orienteerers N/A