Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03900845 |
Other study ID # |
W81XWH-18-1-0559 |
Secondary ID |
CDMRP-OR170314 |
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 17, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
April 15, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Individuals with lower limb amputation often complain about uncomfortable residual limb skin
temperatures and the accumulation of sweat inside their prostheses. It doesn't take long
before the presence of sweat on the residual limb leads to a lack of confidence in the
security of their prosthetic suspension. Some circumstances allow the wearer to doff the
prosthesis before it falls off, wipe it and the residual limb dry, and then don it again.
Another option is to simply reduce the intensity of activities before sweat becomes a
problem. However, the Warfighter amputee may not be afforded such accommodations. For these
service personnel, inadequate moisture management can significantly limit or inhibit their
mobility. The objective of the proposed research is to provide lower limb amputees who work
in demanding environments with a prosthesis that remains secure despite profuse residual limb
sweating without compromising residual limb health and comfort.
The aim of this research is to compare three different, lower limb prosthetic suspension
systems and identify which is most effective at maintaining a secure adherence when worn in
conditions that result in profuse sweating. The investigators also aim to compare how the
three study prostheses effect residual limb skin health and comfort when participants pursue
their usual activities in the home, work, and community environments.
To achieve these aims, the investigators will to recruit 25 below-knee amputees. Each subject
will be asked to be asked to wear: (1) their as-prescribed prosthesis, (2) a prosthesis with
a perforated elastomeric liner that allows sweat to flow away from the skin, and (3) a
prosthesis that has a battery and body-weight activated pump to flow air between the
prosthesis and the residual limb skin, allowing expulsion of any accumulated sweat. Subjects
will wear each of these prostheses in the home, work, and community environments for two
weeks, after which the investigators will measure their residual limb health and comfort.
Subjects will then walk on a treadmill in a room whose climate will be set to Middle
East-like conditions: 35 °C (95 °F) and 50% relative humidity. After 30 minutes, the
investigators will measure any slippage of their prosthesis relative to their limb and how
much sweat is expelled. The investigators hypothesize there will be differences in the amount
of slippage, residual limb health, and comfort between the three prostheses.
Description:
Individuals with lower limb amputation often complain about uncomfortable residual limb skin
temperatures, accumulation of perspiration inside their prostheses, and loss of confidence in
suspension security that often leads them to cease their activities or, in demanding
circumstances, may lead to their prosthesis falling off. Most amputees can sense the
impending loss of suspension during vigorous activities and can stop, doff the prosthesis,
wipe it and the residual limb dry, and then don it again. However, the Warfighter amputee may
not be afforded such accommodations.
The investigators will compare the performance of an individual's as-prescribed suspension
with two exciting alternatives: a new-to-market liner intended to transport perspiration away
from the skin and an improved version of the Dynamic Air Exchange (DAE) suspension system the
investigators developed. The new-to-market suspension system consists of a perforated
elastomeric liner that allows perspiration to be exuded into the liner-prosthesis space.
Anecdotal reports suggest this liner (Uniprox's SoftSkin Air), can maintain suspension during
profuse perspiration, but may result in excessive skin dryness and discomfort. The improved
Dynamic Air Exchange - Rising Edge Design (DAE-RED) suspension expels accumulated
perspiration using a vacuum pump like its predecessor, but incorporates hybrid, body-weight
activated pump to minimize battery consumption and a revised ventilation system obviating the
need for undesirable exterior tube connections.
The objective of the proposed research is to provide lower limb amputees who work in
demanding environments with a prosthesis that remains secure despite profuse residual limb
perspiration without compromising residual limb health and comfort.
The proposed research has two specific aims: (1) compare three different, lower limb
prosthetic suspension systems and identify which is most effective at maintaining a secure
adherence when worn in conditions that result in profuse perspiration, and (2) compare how
the three suspension systems effect residual limb skin health and comfort when participants
pursue their usual activities in the home, work, and community environments.
The investigators will recruit unilateral transtibial amputees who are successful ambulators
on their as-prescribed prosthesis and collect baseline data (residual limb skin hydration,
transepidermal water loss (skin barrier function), and Socket Comfort Score). After fitting
the participants with Uniprox and DAE-RED prostheses, subjects will wear one of these study
prostheses (random order) for two weeks, after which the investigators will measure their
skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, and Socket Comfort Score. The subject will then
enter our environmental chamber (35° C and 50% relative humidity) and sit for a 30-minute
acclimation period. The subject will then walk for 30 minutes on a treadmill at their
self-selected speed. Subjects will then exit the environmental chamber and sit for 30 minutes
in a comfortable climate (~20° C and 50% relative humidity). The amount of slippage, along
with the perspiration accumulated/expelled, will be then be measured. Subjects will then be
fit with their as-prescribed prosthesis and the protocol repeated to washout intervention
effects. Finally, subjects will be fit with the other study prosthesis (either Uniprox or
DAE-RED) and repeat the protocol.
After wearing the prostheses in our environmental chamber set to Middle East-like conditions
(35 °C and 50% relative humidity), the investigators hypothesize:
H1.1 The amount of slippage (loss of adherence) will be different between the three
suspension systems.
H1.2 The amount of perspiration expelled will be different between the Uniprox and DAE-RED.
After wearing the study prostheses in the home, work, and community environments for two
weeks, the investigators hypothesize:
H2.1 Residual limb skin hydration will be different between the three suspension systems.
H2.2 Residual limb transepidermal water loss will be different between the three suspension
systems.
H2.3 The Socket Comfort Score will be different between the three suspension systems.