Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Physical Therapy Program in Combination With Erector Spina Plane Block on Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study
Degenerative (de novo) scoliosis is the result of a long and multifactorial process that occurs through degenerative change in the aging population without a pre-existing spinal deformity. Pain is the most important symptom and the major difference from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Treatment is often complex and patient-specific. The first aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy on pain, disability and quality of life in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis and the second aim is to investigate whether erector spina plan block (ESPB) combined with physical therapy has an effect on the results.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | September 15, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | March 15, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 60 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Being 60 years or older - Having a scoliosis of 10 degrees or more in the lumbar region according to the measurement made with the cobb method - Having pain in the axial waist or radiating from the waist to the leg - Pain that persists for at least 3 months - NRS > 4 Exclusion Criteria: - Systemic or local infection at the injection site - Past or current history of malignant disease - Presence of neurological or orthopedic disease - Presence of uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus - Presence of severe heart failure - Presence of bleeding diathesis - Anticoagulant use - Lidocaine allergy - Psychiatric disorder or mental problem - inflammatory spine pain - Severe osteoporosis / previous vertebral fracture - Body mass index >35 - Having had previous surgery on the lumbar region - Injection was applied to the waist region within 6 months or physical have been treated |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Farih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital | Istanbul | |
Turkey | Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital |
Turkey,
Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Ciftci B, Celik M, Karaca O. Continuous ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic pain. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019 Aug;38(4):395-396. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 15. No abstract available. — View Citation
Akyuz ME, Firidin MN. Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative persistent low back pain in lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2022 Jul;31(7):1873-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07212-z. Epub 2022 Apr 14. — View Citation
Durmus IE, Surucu S, Muz A, Takmaz SA. The effectiveness of erector spinae plane block in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):138-143. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202301_30864. — View Citation
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. — View Citation
Graham RB, Sugrue PA, Koski TR. Adult Degenerative Scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Apr;29(3):95-107. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000367. — View Citation
Ploumis A, Transfledt EE, Denis F. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.015. Epub 2007 Feb 28. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) | Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable" | Day 0 | |
Primary | NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) | Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable" | 1 hour after injection | |
Primary | NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) | Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable" | 1 week after physical treatment | |
Primary | NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) | Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable" | 1 month after physical treatment | |
Primary | NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) | Pain Intensity Assessment ( 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable" | 3 month after physical treatment | |
Secondary | SRS-22 | 22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy. Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | SRS-22 | 22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy. Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item. | 1 week after physical treatment | |
Secondary | SRS-22 | 22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy. Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item. | 1 month after physical treatment | |
Secondary | SRS-22 | 22 questions make up the SRS-22, which covers five domains: function/activity, pain, self-perceived image, mental health, and satisfaction with therapy. Scores range from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each item. | 3 month after physical treatment | |
Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index | Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5. The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index | Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5. The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst. | 1 week after physical treatment | |
Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index | Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5. The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst. | 1 month after physical treatment | |
Secondary | Oswestry Disability Index | Each item has six statements and is scored between 0 and 5. The overall score is then calculated as a percentage, with 0% denoting no disability and 100% denoting the highest level of disability, with 0 denoting the least disability and 5 denoting the worst. | 3 month after physical treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|