Treating ALBP With Acupuncture - Comparison of the Efficacy Between Distal

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial on acupuncture for Acute Low Back Pain(ALBP). According to literature, using distal acupoints only to treat ALBP is mostly recognized, but in our daily clinical practice, it is common to use local acupoints mainly combined with distal acupoints. Which method leads to better effect is one important clinical question in treating Low Back Pain(LBP) by acupuncture. In this proposed study, the investigators aim to compare the efficacy of using "distal acupoints only" and "local acupoints mainly combined with distal acupoints" on ALBP.

Clinical Trial Description

It will be a randomized controlled trial on acupuncture for ALBP, conducted at the Pok Oi Hospital - Hong Kong Baptist University Chinese Medicine Clinic cum Training and Research Centre (Kowloon City District) (KCDCMCTR). Registered Chinese Medicine Practitioner(RCMP) with at least two years of clinical experience and trained to treat participants in accordance with study protocols. 102 (18-65 years in age) participants with ALBP will be recruited from the public through advertisement and from the clinic (KCDCMCTR). Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. The participants are randomly allocated into two groups: distal acupoints only group(DPOG) and local acupoints mainly combined with distal acupoints group(LPMG). The DPOG (n=51) will receive acupuncture of distal acupoints only(SI3, EX-UE7). The LPMG (n=51) will receive acupuncture of local acupoints mainly(BL23, BL25, BL32) combined with distal points(BL40). Participants will be treated twice a week for a total of four weeks. Every participant will be administered 8 sessions of acupuncture. The primary outcome will be the change in low back pain intensity(in VAS scores) before and after the treatment. The secondary outcomes will be the Oswestry Disability Index. All outcomes will be evaluated at every session of treatment and the follow up period. Follow-up will be scheduled 1 month and 3 months after the completion of treatments. This clinical trial lasts 4 months. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05319288
Study type	Interventional
Source	Hong Kong Baptist University
Contact
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	September 1, 2022
Completion date	March 31, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03916705` - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility	N/A
Completed	`NCT04007302` - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago	N/A
Completed	`NCT03273114` - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03600207` - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04284982` - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05600543` - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT05410366` - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed	`NCT03673436` - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed	`NCT02546466` - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT00983385` - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05156242` - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04673773` - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049251` - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049277` - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04980469` - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle	N/A
Completed	`NCT04055545` - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05944354` - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Recruiting	`NCT05552248` - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Completed	`NCT05801588` - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life	N/A
Completed	`NCT05811143` - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Treating ALBP With Acupuncture - Comparison of the Efficacy Between Distal Points and Local Points

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms