Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04411420
Other study ID # Pro00101938
Secondary ID UH3AT009790
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 8, 2021
Est. completion date January 2025

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Duke University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose and objective of this pragmatic trial is to examine the effectiveness of two different quality improvement care pathways for low back pain (LBP); a sequenced, integrated care pathway (ICP) and 2) a coordinated, care management pathway (CCP). We will test the central hypothesis that the ICP will reduce pain interference with normal activities and improve physical function, as measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form scores when compared to the CCP.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 1815
Est. completion date January 2025
Est. primary completion date May 13, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Clinic eligibility: - Volunteer and return signed clinic participation agreement - Availability of clinical personnel willing to deliver the treatment interventions (in either arm). - Staff and location need to be distinct from other enrolled clinics. - Clinics can have a variable number of providers, but together meet criteria for range of monthly visits for low back pain. Participant Survey Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age >= 18 2. Seeking care for LBP with or without radiating symptoms from a participating VA primary care clinic 3. Provider determines LBP is appropriate for conservative management 4. Referred to integrated ICP pathway or CCP pathway by participating clinic provider Exclusion Criteria: 1. Receiving or referred for hospice/ palliative care (defined by encounter codes and CPRS consults) 2. No documented phone number in the electronic health record.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Pain modulation with physical pain treatment
Examples of pain modulation with physical pain treatment include spinal manipulation, massage, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Telephone delivered self-management counseling for increasing physical activity
Centrally located physical therapy assistants will provide six weeks of telehealth consults to increase physical activity for the patient
Telephone delivered behavioral treatment for participants with high risk for continued disability
Patients with a higher risk of developing chronic or persistent back pain will be identified using the nine question risk stratification start back screening tool (SBST) and will receive six additional weeks of physical activity instructions and additional pain modulation treatments as needed.
Patient preference treatment protocol
the pain navigator will work through a shared decision making process with the patient to determine the preferred treatment protocol
Nonpharmacological guideline adherent treatment protocol
the pain navigator will select only nonpharmacological guideline adherent treatment options for the patient
Facilitated referrals to existing VA or non-VA pain management resources
the pain navigator will work with the referring physician to select only existing VA or non-VA pain management resources for the patient.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Durham VA Durham North Carolina

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Duke University Durham VA Medical Center, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Ballengee LA, King HA, Simon C, Lentz TA, Allen KD, Stanwyck C, Gladney M, George SZ, Hastings SN. Partner engagement for planning and development of non-pharmacological care pathways in the AIM-Back trial. Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):463-472. doi: 10.1177/17407745231178789. Epub 2023 Jun 2. — View Citation

George SZ, Coffman CJ, Allen KD, Lentz TA, Choate A, Goode AP, Simon CB, Grubber JM, King H, Cook CE, Keefe FJ, Ballengee LA, Naylor J, Brothers JL, Stanwyck C, Alkon A, Hastings SN. Improving Veteran Access to Integrated Management of Back Pain (AIM-Back): Protocol for an Embedded Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 12;21(Suppl 2):S62-S72. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa348. — View Citation

Lentz TA, Coffman CJ, Cope T, Stearns Z, Simon CB, Choate A, Gladney M, France C, Hastings SN, George SZ. If You Build It, Will They Come? Patient and Provider Use of a Novel Hybrid Telehealth Care Pathway for Low Back Pain. Phys Ther. 2024 Feb 1;104(2):pzad127. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad127. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Catastrophizing Catastrophizing questions from the NIH recommended minimum data set will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline and will evaluate catastrophizing with several agree / disagree questions. Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Concise (AUDIT-C) The AUDIT-C form scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure alcohol use. The AUDIT-C form asks the participant to rate a series of alcohol use questions on a scale of 0-4 with zero representing a better outcome Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Pain intensity, Enjoyment of life, general activity (PEG) screening tool The PEG screening tool scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure pain intensity. The PEG form asks the participant to rate a series of pain intensity related questions on a scale of 0-10 with 0 representing a better outcome Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire from the PSEQ-2 form will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline and will evaluate self-efficacy on a scale of 0-6 with zero representing a worse outcome. Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Depressed Mood The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ2) form scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure depressed mood. The PHQ2 form asks the participant to answer two questions about potential depressed mood within the past week. Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Other Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--Quality of Life The EUROQUOL five item quality of life questionnaire will be administered by interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure quality of life. The EUROQUOL asks the participant a series of questions related to quality of life on a scale of 0-5. Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Primary Change in Pain Interference Measure The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected by the clinical providers within the medical record at baseline and three months to measure pain interference. The pain interference form asks the participant to rate a series of pain related questions on a scale of 1-5 within the past seven days with 1 representing a better outcome. With the revised statistical analysis plan, the patient reported outcomes survey data will be used to supplement missing three month follow up data from the medical record, when possible. Baseline, three months post baseline
Primary Change in Physical Function Measure The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected by the clinical providers within the medical record at baseline and three months to measure physical function. The physical function form asks the participant to rate a series of physical function related questions on a scale of 1-5 within the past seven days with one representing a better outcome. With the revised statistical analysis plan, the patient reported outcomes survey data will be used to supplement missing three month follow up data from the medical record, when possible. Baseline, three months post baseline
Secondary Change in Sleep Disturbance The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected in the medical record by the provider at baseline, and three months post baseline to measure sleep disturbance. The sleep disturbance form asks the participant to rate a series of sleep related questions on a scale of 1-5 with one representing a better outcome Baseline, three months post baseline
Secondary Change in Patient reported Outcomes--PROMIS Sleep Disturbance The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure sleep disturbance. The sleep disturbance form asks the participant to rate a series of sleep related questions on a scale of 1-5 with one representing a better outcome Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Secondary Change in Opioid Use--Chronic User opioid use will be defined at baseline and 12 months post baseline as a binary variable based on whether a chronic opioid user or not at baseline and at twelve months Baseline, twelve months post baseline
Secondary Change in Opioid Use--Morphine Dose opioid use--morphine dose will be defined at baseline and 12 months post baseline as a continuous variable measuring morphine equivalents for opioid dose at baseline and twelve months Baseline, twelve months post baseline
Secondary Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--PROMIS Pain Interference The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure pain interference. The pain interference form asks the participant to rate a series of pain related questions on a scale of 1-5 within the past seven days with one representing a better outcome Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
Secondary Change in Patient Reported Outcomes--PROMIS Physical Function The PROMIS Short form scores will be collected by the interviewers at baseline, three, six, and twelve months post baseline to measure physical function. The physical function form asks the participant to rate a series of physical function related questions on a scale of 1-5 with one representing a better outcome. Baseline, three, six, and twelve months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.