Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Will Patients With Low Back Pain Benefit From the Advice of Staying Active
The variabilities in the management approaches for patients with LBP reflect uncertainty
about the optimal approach. Therefore, there is a need for the implementation of early
treatment strategies relying on an evidence-based knowledge to treat the problems and reduce
the risk for recurrence and chronicity of LBP.
Advice is considered as the 'first in line' for the treatment of patients with LBP and is
recommended in all international guidelines, yet it is under-utilized by the general
practitioners. The current evidence in favor for the advice of staying active for patients
with LBP is limited, with small or no benefits in pain relief, functional improvement or sick
leave compared to rest in bed. Consequently, there is a huge gap between the evidence and
practice.
So, the current study aimed at filling this gap and expanding the previous findings by
investigating the effect of the advice of staying active on the level of perceived pain,
physical activity level, postural control and functional disability in patients with low risk
LBP (with a total score of three or less based on the STarT Back Tool score).
In spite of the great effort, LBP remains a significant burden on the society and can cause a
disturbing impact on the functional ability during the productive years of the individuals.
It is important to find pragmatic treatments that not only reduce the pain, but also decrease
the disability. Activity monitoring in real life has the potential to change our concept of
outcomes, and as a result, expand our ideas about the appropriateness of the interventions in
rehabilitation.
The international guidelines vary but agree on advising patients with LBP to remain
physically active. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE)'s updated guideline
on the LBP recommends encouraging people to continue with their normal activities as far as
possible. NICE found that there were no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (which are the
best way of investigating the efficacy of a treatment) that compared the effect of the advice
of staying active with no advice or the advice to rest.
Despite the guidelines, it was reported that many health care providers are still too
restrictive and believe that LBP requires some avoidance of activities and to remain off-
work. Many general practitioners do not give advice on daily activities to patients with back
pain and there is confusion about what constitutes an effective advice. Only 12% of the
physiotherapists identify correctly the guidelines, and most of them do not agree with these
guidelines regarding the return to work or activity. Investigating the benefit of the advice
of staying active and different active intervention programs in patients with low risk NSLBP
may help in developing recommendations for the physiotherapists responsible for reviewing
exercise protocols for patients with LBP.
Therefore, the improvement of the primary care management of patients with LBP has the
potential to reduce the long-term effects of back pain, including persistent disabling
symptoms, low quality of life, and reduced capacity to work. The advice of staying active may
not only be a treatment to improve the recovery from LBP, but also an opportunity to promote
physical activity for other health benefits, such as improved cardio-metabolic function,
blood pressure, and reduced body fatness.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|