Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03986047
Other study ID # Heat and exercises for ALBP
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date April 18, 2019
Est. completion date April 15, 2024

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Laval University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Low back pain (LBP) ranks among the first diseases in term of years lived with disability. The latest Clinical Guideline from the American College of Physicians for acute LBP recommends to select "nonpharmacologic treatment with superficial heat, massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation". The application of superficial heat ("thermal therapy") may provide enough pain relief in the acute phase to remain active, which is recommended to prevent the development of chronicity. However, no studies have tested if the combination of heat and exercises provide additional benefit on short, middle and long-term follow-up in people with acute LBP. Hence, the main objective of this study is to determine the immediate, short-, middle- and long-term effect of continuous low-level thermal therapy in combination or not with exercises on pain, disability, and physical activity level in people with acute LBP. Project hypothesis : The Thermal care + Exercises group will show greater improvement in pain, disability and physical activity level than both Thermal care and Control groups for immediate, short-, middle- and long-term follow-ups. Sixty individuals with acute LBP will be recruited. This study will include six assessments over 6 months. At the baseline evaluation, participants will complete questionnaires on symptoms, disability, pain-related fear and self-efficacy. Afterwards, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention programs: 1) Thermal care group, 2) Exercises + Thermal care group, and 3) Control group. They will immediately meet a physical therapist to review and perform their assigned program. Participants will then take part in their assigned 7-day intervention program, during which they will wear a fitness wristband to track physical activity level. Finally, the same outcomes will be reassessed to determine the effect of intervention at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after baseline.


Description:

Low back pain (LBP) ranks among the first diseases in term of years lived with disability, which is mostly explained by the development of recurrent or chronic pain. A systematic review observed that 62% of patients still have pain 12 months after onset (recurrent and chronic) while another estimated that between 2% and 34% of acute cases will develop chronic LBP. These rates highlight the need to identify the best therapeutic approaches at the acute stage to prevent transition to chronicity and high recurrence. The latest Clinical Guideline from the American College of Physicians for acute LBP recommends to select "nonpharmacologic treatment with superficial heat, massage, acupuncture or spinal manipulation". The application of superficial heat ("thermal therapy") presented the strongest evidence (moderate) for short-term reduction in pain. Four randomized controlled trials (RCT) that tested the effect of a wearable heatwrap (the most studied form of thermal therapy in acute LBP) reported a reduction in pain and disability up to 2 days after cessation of the intervention: an effect superior to Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen or oral placebo. Heatwrap may provide enough pain relief in the acute phase to remain active, which is recommended to prevent the development of chronicity. One RCT showed that the addition of a heatwrap to exercise provided greater short-term improvement in pain/disability than exercise alone. Although some authors suggest that an increase in physical activity level may explain such an effect, this assumption has not been tested yet. Hence, the main objective of this RCT is to determine the immediate, short-, middle- and long-term effect of continuous low-level thermal therapy in combination or not with exercises on pain, disability, and physical activity level in people with acute LBP. Project hypothesis : The Thermal care + Exercises group will show greater improvement in pain, disability and physical activity level than both Thermal care and Control groups for immediate, short-, middle- and long-term follow-ups. Participants: Individuals with acute LBP will be included according to the mentioned inclusion/exclusion criteria. They will be recruited from medical and through the electronic mailing list of Université Laval (> 52,000 individuals). The list of participants of the Quebec Low Back Pain Study (QLBPS Core Dataset, funded by the QPRN) will also be used - all participants in the Quebec City area recruited for the QLBPS Core Dataset will be referred for the present project. Study Design: This study will include six assessments over 6 months : baseline pre, 1-hour post, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months. At the baseline evaluation (baseline pre), participants will complete self-administered questionnaires on symptoms and disability (Numerical scale for pain, Oswestry Disability Index - ODI, Global Rating of Change - GRC), on pain-related fear (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia - TSK) and on pain-related self-efficacy (Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale short version - CDSES-6). Finally, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention programs: 1) Thermal care group, 2) Thermal care + Exercises group, and 3) Control group. Immediately after group assignment (same session), participants will meet a physical therapist (PT) to review their assigned program (60-minutes meeting), during which a ThermaCare® Heat wrap or a sham wrap will be applied by the PT. In Thermal Care + Exercises group, an exercise program will be taught by the PT then performed by participants. General advices on the management of acute LBP will be given to all participants. Thereafter, the immediate effect of thermal therapy on pain will be evaluated (1-hour post-intervention assesment). After the baseline evaluation and PT session, participants will perform their assigned 7-day intervention program. Every day, they will complete a logbook related to their pain level during the previous day and to their adherence to their program. In addition, participants will wear a fitness wristband to track physical activity level for 7 days (number of steps per day). Then, pain, ODI, GRC, TSK and CDSES-6 will be assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after baseline to determine short-, middle-, and long-term effect of interventions. Randomisation: a list will be generated using a computer random number generator by an independent research assistant (allocation concealed in sealed and opaque envelopes). Sample size & Statistical analyses: Based on sample size calculation, calculated for the primary outcome (ODI) and previous data from the project investigators group (n=50 with acute LBP), 20 participants are required per group (G*Power 3.1.7; effect size: 0.80, α = 0.05, β = 0.80, mean baseline ODI of 44.0 +/- 13.5, lost at follow-up = 10%). Thus, 60 participants with acute LBP will be recruited. To determine the effect of interventions, two-way ANOVA (Group x Time) will be performed (after confirming normality and homogeneity of variance). Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons will be used (posthoc), and effect sizes will be reported (η2).


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date April 15, 2024
Est. primary completion date April 15, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - to be suffering from low back pain (LBP) for a period of less than 6 weeks (with or without leg pain) that had limited one's activities or changed the daily routine for more than a day, - to have been pain free for at least 3 months before the onset of the current LBP episode. Exclusion Criteria: - "red flag" signs that may suggest serious spinal pathology, - history of spinal surgery, - obvious lower limb radiculopathy - fibromyalgia - rheumatoid arthritis - important skin lesion in the lumbar area - alteration of cutaneous sensations or temperature perception - being pregnant of trying to become

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Thermal care
Wearing of a light elastic lower back heating wrap, which heats up to 40°C within 30 minutes and maintains this temperature continuously for 8 hours. Heat wrap will be worn during the day for 8 hours on 7 consecutive days.
Other:
Exercises
In addition of exercises performed with the physiotherapist at the first session, exercises will be performed at home five times over the next 7 days, for approximately 30 minutes each performing day. Three different categories of exercises will be given: 1) Functional activities exposure (sitting, sit-to-stand, lifting, bending, etc.); 2) cognitive contraction of trunk muscles and basic trunk motor control exercises; 3) mobility of the lumbar spine and preferential direction of movement. Exercises will be chosen and adapted for each participant by a physiotherapist, in function of pain presentation and intensity, and response to exercises.
Device:
Sham
The same lower back wrap as the Thermal care group will be used, but cooled down to room temperature (opened in advance). The wrap will be worn following the same parameters (duration, frequency) than the Thermal care group.
Behavioral:
Education for the management of acute low back pain
Participants will receive education on the management of acute low back pain by a physiotherapist . The main topics addressed will be patient reassurance, staying active, avoiding bed rest, activity modification, and sitting and bed postures/transfer. Participants will received a document that details advices covered during the session and the physiotherapist will answer any questions.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS) Québec

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Laval University Quebec Pain Research Network

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in functional limitations and symptoms measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1 A list of ten items to assess symptoms (low back pain) and the functional disability it has caused in 9 different areas of everyday life. Score ranges from 0 to 100. Change from baseline at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up
Secondary Immediate change in current pain intensity after a 1-hour intervention with a numerical rating scale. 11-points rating scale (0 to 10), ranging from ''No pain'' to ''Worst pain imaginable'' Change from baseline to 1 hour (after a 1-hour intervention)
Secondary Change in ''average pain intensity during the last 24 hours'' at 1 week measured with a numerical rating scale. 11-points rating scale (0 to 10), ranging from ''No pain'' to ''Worst pain imaginable'' Change between baseline and after the 1-week intervention
Secondary Change in ''average pain intensity during the last 7 days'' measured with a numerical rating scale. 11-points rating scale (0 to 10), ranging from ''No pain'' to ''Worst pain imaginable'' Change from baseline at 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-ups
Secondary Change in pain-related fear measured with Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK-11). 11-item version of the TSK questionnaire that measures problematic beliefs and behaviours associated with pain, focusing on beliefs that pain is damaging and that painful movements should be avoided. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 4=strongly agree). The total score ranges from 11 to 44 points, and higher scores signify greater fear of re-injury due to movement. Change from baseline at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up
Secondary Change in self-efficacy measured with the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale - Short-Version (CDSES-6) 6-item version of the CDSES-33 questionnaire which measures the self-efficacy to perform behaviors and to achieve outcomes among those with chronic diseases (also validated with chronic pain for French Canadian population). Each item is measured using a numerical scale ranging from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident). The total score is obtained by calculating the mean of the 6 items and ranges from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Change from baseline at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up
Secondary Change in physical activity level at 1 week, assessed by the number of steps walked per day. Measured with a fitness wristband Difference between groups at 1 week
Secondary Global Rating of Change A single-item question that asks whether and to what extent the patient perceive change in his global lower back pain condition has occurred, since the initial evaluation, on a 15-point Likert scale Collected at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month and 6-month follow-up
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.