Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effects of Two Different Dry-Needling Techniques on Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Activation and Pressure Pain Threshold in Healthy Adults and Patients With Low Back Pain
Although dry-needling with or without manipulation has shown to be a useful technique to reduce pain in patients with low back pain (LBP), it is unclear which of these two dry-needling techniques would have a greater effect on the lumboscaral multifidus (LM) muscle activation, which is essential in LBP rehabilitation. Therefore, the purposes of the study are: 1) to investigate whether or not dry-needling would change muscle activity of the LM muscles in asymptomatic healthy adults and in individuals with LBP, respectively, and 2) to compare the effects of two dry-needling techniques on LM muscle activation and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic healthy adults and individuals with LBP, respectively.
PARTICIPANTS
Participants will be recruited from local communities, including but not limited to Texas
Woman's University (TWU) via flyers. The flyers will be posted at the TWU - Dallas campus,
and Texas Physical Therapy Specialist - Dallas where one of the principal investigators, Zach
Couch, works, and other community centers with approval.
Participants who are interested in taking part in the study will be asked to call the
investigators to schedule an appointment. The consent form will be presented at the beginning
of the appointment.
Eligible participants are English-speaking adults and are 18 years of age or older.
Additional criteria for asymptomatic healthy adults include no existing LBP and no LBP in the
past 6 months. Additional criteria for symptomatic participants include existing LBP near the
L5-S2 level with an average pain intensity score ≥ 2/10 in the past 24 hours (numeric pain
rating scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain).
Exclusion criteria for all participants include bleeding disorders (e.g. hemophilia), use of
anti-coagulants (e.g. Coumadin), previous low back surgery, systemic joint disease (e.g.
rheumatoid arthritis), cancer of the lower quadrant, neurological disorders, allergic
reaction to adhesive tape, or inability to obtain the testing position (prone lying).
OUTCOME MEASURES
1. Electromyographic (EMG) activity A Delsys EMG system with 2 wireless surface electrodes
(Delsys Inc., Natick, MA) will be used to obtain muscle activities of the LM, one at the
L5 level, and the other at the S2 level. The bandwidth of the EMG system will be set at
20 to 450 Hz with a gain of 1,000. The EMG signal will be recorded at a sampling rate of
2,000 Hz. Each surface electrode has a built-in reference electrode.
2. Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) A hand-held computerized pressure algometer (Medoc ltd.,
Ramat Yishai, Israel) will be used to determine the PPT on the two most tender points
corresponding to the two EMG electrode sites. The algometer consists of a 1-cm2 round
tip that will be pressed vertically on the target locations of the muscle. To provoke
the patient's pain or discomfort, pressure will be increased at a rate of 40 kPa/sec
until the participant feels pain as indicated by pressing a patient safety unit. The
limit of pressure threshold will be set at 800 kPa, meaning that a pressure exceeding
800 kPa will be cut off to minimize tissue damage. If the participant does not push the
button at 800 kPa, a value of 800 is used as the threshold value.
PROCEDURE
After participants are informed of the risks, benefits and procedures of the study, they will
be asked to sign a written consent form approved by the TWU Institutional Review Board -
Dallas. Eligible participants will be asked to complete an intake form to collect their
demographic data (age, gender, height, weight, occupation, hand dominance), past medical
history, and questions related to their past history of pain if applicable (onset, injury
mechanism if any, location, duration, type, and nature). The symptomatic participants also
will be asked to rate their pain intensity at present, at worst, and at best in the past 24
hours using the NPRS. Participants who exhibit any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded
from the study. Once the participants is determined to be eligible for the study, they will
be asked to complete the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW),
which will be used to determine their perceived disability and functional limitations due to
LBP.
Next, the EMG activity and PPTs will be collected from the painful side of the participants
with LBP and the right side of the asymptomatic participants. When the symptomatic
participants have bilateral LBP, the EMG activity and PPTs will be collected from the most
painful side. If both sides are equally painful, a coin toss was performed to select the side
(heads for the right side, tails for the left side).
During the EMG and PPT testing, participants will be asked to lie in a prone position on an
examination table with their arms on the sides. A pillow was placed under the participant's
abdomen to flatten the lumbar lordotic curve and an inclinometer will be placed on the
lumbosacral junction to ensure the lumbar curve ≤10°. The spinous processes of the L1-S2 and
posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) will be be identified by palpation and marked with a
skin marker.
1. EMG Activity Recording
To prepare for EMG recording, each participant's skin over the LM muscles (between
L4-S2) will be cleaned with alcohol and, if needed, excessive hair will be shaved using
a disposable razor. Adhesive tape will be used to affix two wireless EMG electrodes to
the skin over the LM muscles, one at the L5 level and the other at the S2 level.
Following the recommendation by the Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive
Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM) project (http://www.seniam.org/), the L5 electrodes were
placed at the level of the L5 spinous process (i.e. about 2 - 3 cm from the midline) and
aligned with a line from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) to the interspace
between the L1 and L2 spinous process. The S2 electrode was placed medial to the PSIS.
During EMG recording, participants will be asked to abduct the contralateral shoulder
and flex the contralateral elbow to approximately 90° while holding a 1.5 or 2 lb. hand
weight. A participant will hold a 1.5 lb. hand weight if his/her body weight is less
than 175 lbs., and hold a 2 lb. hand weight if his/her body weight is more than 175 lbs.
First, the EMG activity of the LM was recorded during a contralateral arm lift (Figure
1a), which has been shown to best elicit LM muscle activation. A verbal instruction will
be given before the participant performed the contralateral arm lift: "Breathe normally.
Without moving your pelvis or spine, raise your arm above the table". Each participant
will be given one practice trial before EMG recording begins, and then perform a
5-second contralateral arm lift five times. If a participant demonstrate difficulty in
holding for 5 seconds, the participant will be allowed to hold for a shorter period of
time, but a minimum of 3 seconds.
Next, two trials of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the LM muscles
will be obtained by asking the participant to perform a contralateral arm lift while the
investigator applies a steady downward force on the elbow opposite the side of the
tested LM muscles (Figure 1b). Two 5-second MVIC trials will be recorded with a minimum
of a 1-min rest between the two trials.
2. Pressure-pain Threshold (PPT) Testing
For PPT testing, participants will be instructed to stop the test as soon as the
"pressure" becomes "uncomfortable or painful" and will be instructed not to allow the
"uncomfortable or painful sensation" to continue. A standardized instruction will be
given to each participant prior to PPT testing:
"This is a patient safety unit. (The investigator will show the participant the unit).
Please hold it with the hand opposite of the testing side. When the testing begins, we
will push the rounded tip of this instrument (point to the pressure algometer) into this
muscle (point to the testing point) and you will feel a "pressure-like" sensation. As
soon as this pressure-like sensation becomes painful or uncomfortable to you, push the
green button of the patient safety unit immediately. By pushing the green button, you
can stop the testing. Do not let this painful or uncomfortable sensation continue." Four
trials will be performed on each of two tender points.
3. Interventions
Three investigators are experienced physical therapists in treating patients with LBP.
All are certificated manual therapists and fellows with the America Academy of
Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy. In addition, one investigator has practiced
dry-needling for the past 12 years and the other two have practiced dry-needling for the
past 5 years. Before data collections, the two dry-needling intervention techniques will
be standardized so that all three investigators will be able to administer either one of
the two dry-needling techniques when they are needed. In addition, the research
assistants who will collect the outcome measures (EMG activity and PPT) will be blinded
to the type of the dry-needling techniques.
Once baseline outcome measures are collected, each participant will be randomly assigned
into one of the dry-needling intervention techniques, with and without needle
manipulation. The insertion of the needles will be the same for both techniques. A
sterile, disposable 0.30 mm x 50 mm or 0.30 x 60 mm solid filament needle (Seirom Corp.,
Shizuoka, Japan) will be inserted into the bilateral LM muscles approximately 1.5 cm
lateral to the L5 or S2 spinous process level. The needling sites are corresponding to
the EMG and PPT testing points. The needles used in the study will be exactly the same
needles used for acupuncture. After piercing the skin, the needle will be directed
toward the spinous process in a slight inferior-medial angle (approximately 20 °). This
angle was chosen because the needle will be stopped by the bony laminia part of vertebra
to ensure a safe intervention and to standardize the depth of the needle insertion.
For the needle manipulation technique, the needle will be pulled in and out (sparrow
pecking) and redirected in small angles (coning) for 5-10 seconds. For the non-needling
manipulation technique, the four needles will stay (in situ) for 10 minutes after the
insertion of the needle. The investigator who administers the dry needling interventions
will wear gloves during the intervention and will dispose of the used needles in a sharp
container. Because needles will be used in the study, universal precautions will be
followed throughout the data collection.
4. Reassessment
Immediately after the dry-needling intervention, the two outcome measures (EMG activity and
PPTs) will be collected again. Each participant will also be asked about any presence of
common adverse symptoms, including increased pain, nausea, dizziness and fatigue. If bleeding
occurs, the participant will be informed of the occurrence. All participants will also be
asked to avoid strenuous trunk activity or exercises for the following week. All participants
will be scheduled to return in approximately 1 week for the final reassessment, including EMG
activity and PPT testing. After return, all participants will be re-questioning about whether
they experience any adverse symptoms after dry-needling.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|