Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03909672
Other study ID # UFRNventosa
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 10, 2019
Est. completion date February 20, 2020

Study information

Verified date February 2020
Source Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Introduction: Low back pain is a very prevalent condition in the population and windsurf therapy has been presented as a non-pharmacological treatment currently used in this population. However, there is a lack of studies that evaluate such effects, besides a standardization of application of the technique in this condition. This protocol describes a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study that aims to assess the effectiveness of windsurf therapy in improving pain and other symptoms of individuals with chronic non-specific back pain. Methods: Ninety individuals with chronic nonspecific and localized chronic low back pain from 18 to 59 years, will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Afterwards they will be randomized to one of the 2 groups: intervention group (GI) where it will be submitted applied to the windspiration with 2 suctions; and placebo group (GP) with simulated application. Both applications will occur in parallel to the vertebrae from L1 to L5 bilaterally. The application will be performed once a week for eight weeks. The volunteers will be evaluated before treatment (T0), immediately after the first intervention (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T4) and 8 weeks after treatment (T8). The primary endpoint will be pain, and the secondary ones will be kinesiophobia, physical function, lumbar range of motion, sleep quality, patient expectation, quality of life, and psychological factors. Discussion: This is the first protocol that proposes to evaluate the effect of windsotherapy on lumbar ROM, sleep quality, kinesiophobia and psychological problems. Few studies have been done on windsurfing individuals with low back pain, requiring further studies with good methodological quality. Because there is no consensus on the use of windsurf therapy in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain, our protocol will be the basis for the use of the technique by health professionals and for new studies to be performed.


Description:

This study will involve 4 researchers; 1 researcher responsible for evaluations; 1 researcher responsible for interventions; 1 researcher responsible for the interview, initial screening and randomization of participants, and 1 researcher who will perform the statistical analysis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date February 20, 2020
Est. primary completion date December 10, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 59 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- female and male individuals aged between 18 and 59 years, normal BMI, presenting localized and non-specific lower back pain for more than 3 months;

- have not used cupping therapy before;

- report pain between 3 and 8 by NRS;

- individuals who are not under physiotherapeutic treatment during the intervention;

- individuals without neurological, vestibular, visual or auditory deficits that make evaluations impossible.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Individuals with cutaneous lesions in the region where they will be applied to cupping therapy,

- Individuals with uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension;

- Irradiated and sacral lumbar pain;

- Individuals with contraindication to windsurf therapy, are: cancer, renal failure, hepatic and cardiac insufficiency, pacemaker, pregnancy;

- Individuals with severe spinal pathology (including fractures, inflammatory diseases and tumors);

- Travel planning in the next 2 months

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Cupping Therapy
application of cupping therapy with two acrylic type 1 cups (4.5 cm internal diameter, Dong Yang ® brand) with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the L1 to L5 vertebrae bilaterally

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Marcelo Souza Santa Cruz Rio Grande Do Norte

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (2)

Moura CC, Chaves ÉCL, Cardoso ACLR, Nogueira DA, Corrêa HP, Chianca TCM. Cupping therapy and chronic back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Nov 14;26:e3094. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2888.3094. English, Portuguese, Spanis — View Citation

Wang YT, Qi Y, Tang FY, Li FM, Li QH, Xu CP, Xie GP, Sun HT. The effect of cupping therapy for low back pain: A meta-analysis based on existing randomized controlled trials. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1187-1195. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169736. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change from Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Pain The patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible' T0 -baseline, T4 (four week) and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Change from Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used to analyze the quality of life in people with low back pain. This instrument contains in 10 items that assess the impact of low back pain on several functional activities. Values range from 0 to 5, the highest value indicating greater disability. The end result is the sum of all items. T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Range of motion of the lower back (ROM) Will be evaluated through the finger-to-floor test. This test presents high reliability and can be used for clinical practice and scientific studies. T0 -baseline, T4 (four week) and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) Quality of life will be assessed by the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The instrument consists of 36 questions and assesses eight different domains that influence quality of life, considering the individual's perception of their health aspects in the last four weeks. Each item has a group of answers distributed on a Likert-graded scale, and the following dimensions were evaluated: physical function, physical aspect, pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional aspect and mental health. Your total score ranges from 0 to 100, where the higher the value, the better quality of life score. T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Timed Up and Go Test (TUG): This is a functional test which quantifies the mobility of an individual in seconds through the time in which they perform the task, i.e. in how many seconds can they lift themselves from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return to the chair, and sit down again. The test has already been used in individuals to assess function in individuals with low back pain. The shorter the time taken to perform a task, the better the individual's ability to perform. T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPE) Is a direct scale about the patient's self-perception when the intervention is performed.The GPE evaluates using 11 points, starting from a negative 5 (much worse than when starting the treatment), a neutral rating of 0, and 5 is positive (much improvement from starting the treatment). The Portuguese version will be used. The GPE evaluates using 11 points, starting from a negative 5 (much worse than when starting the treatment), a neutral rating of 0, and 5 is positive (much improvement from starting the treatment) . T8 (eight week)
Secondary Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) A questionnaire which has also been validated and translated into Portuguese. This scale has 14 items, 7 for anxiety subscale and 7 for depression. For each item there is a score of 0 to 3, with a total of 21 points for the scale. T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week)
Secondary Medication consumption Patients will be given a daily control list of medication use to mark the amount of their use for low back pain during the study period. T8 (eight week)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.