Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
— SIbackpainOfficial title:
Frequency of Sacroiliac Malrotation in Low Back Pain and Correction With a Simple In-home Exercise: A Randomized Study Comparing Those Treated Immediately to Those Waiting One Month for Treatment
Verified date | October 2021 |
Source | University of British Columbia |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
60 participants with low back pain will be examined to determine the direction and extent of sacroiliac malrotation. If malrotation exists, they will be randomized to 3 treatment groups: 1 will be taught how to use their thigh to push the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) backwards for an anterior malrotation and their sartorius and rectus femoris to pull their ASIS and anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) forward for a posterior malrotation. 2: will be given a pelvic stabilization belt. 3: will return in one month. At the second visit at one month all participants will be treated with both exercise and belt. They will be reassessed at the third visit one month later: the scores for immediate and delayed treatment groups will be compared. Their response to these exercises and/or the pelvic belt will be tested at the first second and third visits, using the brief pain inventory pain, the Oswestry disability scores and the distance between the (posterior superior iliac spine) (PSIS) levels, filled out at every contact. Their satisfaction with previous treatments used will be compared to their satisfaction when using the exercise and belt.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 62 |
Est. completion date | September 11, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | September 11, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years to 90 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 19 to 90 - Participants present with pain in their low back (below the waist) or their buttocks. - Able to attend all 3 study visits at the participating physician's office. - Able to attend at least the first two visits with someone willing to assist them in assessing their back and help them with the necessary exercise if need be. - Willing to perform the corrective exercise and or wear the sacroiliac stabilization belt at home as needed - Their posterior superior iliac spines (PSISs) are not level on initial examination. - The long dorsal sacroiliac ligament below at least one of the (PSISs) is tender to palpation on initial examination. Exclusion Criteria: - Pain experienced is lumbar in origin - Pain secondary to hip or other pathology - PSISs are level at initial examination - No tenderness to pressure under the PSISs - Severe pain elsewhere in the body, making the assessment of back pain difficult. - Presence of ankylosing spondylitis (seen on x-ray, pain worse at night, relieved by exercise, abnormal C reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) - Obvious leg length discrepancy (> 1 ½ cm) when measured umbilicus to medial malleolus. - Location of PSISs cannot be assessed accurately due to back mice or obesity. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Dr. Helene Bertrand Inc. | North Vancouver | British Columbia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of British Columbia |
Canada,
Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians; American College of Physicians; American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):247-8. — View Citation
Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 1;344(5):363-70. Review. — View Citation
Potter NA, Rothstein JM. Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Phys Ther. 1985 Nov;65(11):1671-5. — View Citation
Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Pain. 2009 Apr;10(4):354-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Dec 19. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Oswestry Low-back Pain Disability Questionnaire Score Change Baseline Minus 1 Month: Comparison Immediate Corrective Exercise or Pelvic Stabilization Belt V Delayed: Usual Care | Change in Oswestry low-back disability questionnaire (ODI) score between assessment visit and visit 1 month later. This score is calculated from the sum of the scores in each of 10 sections. Each section is rated 0 for no problem to 5 for complete disability. Section 1, pain intensity, section 2, personal care (washing, dressing etc.), section 3, lifting, section 4, walking, section 5, sitting, section 6, standing, section 7, sleeping, section 8, sex life (if applicable), section 9, social life, section 10, travelling. The score is calculated as: 100 x (sum of the scores in each section / number of sections scored X5). Minimum = 0, maximum = 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. | From baseline to 1 month after each participant used their assigned treatment | |
Primary | Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire Score Change Baseline Minus 2 Month Score, After One Month Of Using Corrective Exercise + Pelvic Stabilization Belt | Change in Oswestry low-back disability questionnaire (ODI) score between assessment visit and visit 2 months later after using the corrective exercise + the pelvic stabilization belt for one month. =(ODI at assessment - ODI at 2 months). The ODI score is calculated from the sum of the scores in each of 10 sections. Each section is rated 0 for no problem to 5 for complete disability. Section 1, pain intensity, section 2, personal care (washing, dressing etc.), section 3, lifting, section 4, walking, section 5, sitting, section 6, standing, section 7, sleeping, section 8, sex life (if applicable), section 9, social life, section 10, travelling. The score is calculated as: 100 x (sum of the scores in each section / number of sections scored). Minimum = 0, maximum = 100. Higher scores mean greater disability, a worse outcome. The greater the change, the better the outcome. | Two months: from baseline visit to last visit two months later when all participants have used both the pelvic stabilization belt and the corrective exercise for one month | |
Secondary | Brief Pain Inventory Score Change Over One Month. Baseline Score Minus 1 Month Score. Comparison: Immediate Corrective Exercise or Pelvic Stabilization Belt V Delayed: Usual Care | Change in BPI pain score between baseline assessment visit and visit one month later: on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) pain in the last 24 hours:
• on average • at its worst • at its best • right now. Average of these values. Minimum value, 0, maximum value, 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. A higher change between the initial visit and the one month visit means a better outcome. |
1 month after initial visit (baseline BPI pain score minus one-month BPI pain score) with each group using their assigned treatment | |
Secondary | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Score Change Over Two Months Comparison: Baseline (BPI) Pain Score Minus 2 Month (BPI) Pain Score, After One Month Of Using Corrective Exercise + Pelvic Stabilization Belt | Change in BPI pain score between baseline visit and visit minus BPI pain score two months later after one month of using corrective exercise + pelvic stabilization belt On a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) pain in the last 24 hours: • on average • at its worst • at its best • right now. Average of these values. Minimum value, 0, maximum value, 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. A higher change between the initial visit and the later visit means a better outcome. | 2 months after baseline visit when all groups have used both the pelvic stabilization belt and the corrective exercise for one month | |
Secondary | Distance Between The Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Levels (PSISL) Using The Sacroiliac Forward Flexion (SIFFT) Test Comparing Corrective Exercise, Pelvic Belt, Conventional Treatment: Baseline Value Minus 1 Month Value.. | Difference in distance in centimetres between the levels of the higher & the lower posterior superior iliac spines as measured using a carpenter's level between the value found on admission and that found one month later (PSISL). The minimum is 0 cm, the maximum is 3.5 cm. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The greater difference when the distance is calculated between admission and one or two months later means a better outcome. | One month comparing the different treatments at baseline and one month later. | |
Secondary | Distance Between The Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Levels (PSISL) Using The Sacroiliac Forward Flexion (SIFFT) Test, Baseline Minus One Month After Using Corrective Exercise (SIFFTE) + Pelvic Stabilization Belt. | The distance between the levels (determined using a carpenter's level) of the higher & the lower posterior superior iliac spines (PSISL) was measured in centimetres. The outcome measure is the difference between the value found on admission and that (PSISL) value found two months later after all participants have use the corrective exercises (SIFFT E) and the sacroiliac stabilizer belt for one month. The minimum is 0 cm, the maximum is 3.5 cm. On admission, higher scores mean a worse outcome. The greater difference when the distance is calculated between admission and two months later means a better outcome. | 2 months: comparing baseline values and values after all participants have used the corrective exercise and the sacroiliac stabilization belt for one month. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|