Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
— IDN5243inLBPOfficial title:
Tolerability, Safety and Activity of IDN5243, 4 mg Bid Intramuscularly in the Treatment of Low Back Pain. A Prospective, Open Label, Single-center, Uncontrolled Study
Verified date | March 2018 |
Source | Indena S.p.A |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective cohort study, open-label, uncontrolled proof of concept trial. The trial objective is to evaluate the analgesic tolerability, safety and activity of IDN 5243 (3-glycosyl-3-O-demethylthiocolchicine derivative)administered intramuscularly at 4 mg b.i.d. for 5 days in the morning (8.00-10.00 AM) and in the evening (6.00-8.00 PM) in subjects with Low Back Pain (LBP).
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | March 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female patients, - 18-70 years old inclusive, - Signed Informed consent obtained prior the inclusion in the trial, - A diagnosis of LBP equal to or greater than 50 mm on VAS with severe or moderate lumbar muscle spasm naïve or in relapsing condition, - Patients must have a medical history, physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of acute LBP that is felt down to the lower leg below the knee with the onset no longer than 30 days before Visit 1, - Patients must be appropriate candidates for treatment with study medication in the Investigator's clinical judgment, - Patients must be able to appropriately verbalize pain characteristics and to complete all protocol required measurements/assessments without assistance, - Patients must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening. Exclusion Criteria: - LPB of non-mechanical origin such as neoplasm, infection or inflammatory chronic disorder, - Serum creatinine level > 1.7 mg/dL or Urea > 17 mmol/l, - Severe to mild hepatic dysfunction, - Abnormal blood count, - Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the active principle and/or formulations' ingredients, - History of anaphylaxis to drugs or allergic reactions in particular, history of hypersensitivity reactions (e.g. bronchospasm, rhinitis, urticaria) to drugs including to paracetamol, - Patients with diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, osteoarthritis pain, fibromyalgia, - History of psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia or psychotic depression) or major depression (requiring treatment), diagnosis including dementia, anxiety, mental retardation; multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Restless Legs Syndrome, - Significant kidney or liver disease, - History of gastrointestinal disorders, - Blood coagulation disorders, - Skin conditions affecting the site of application (e.g. eczema, weeping dermatitis), - Use of paracetamol and/or NSAIDs (NonSteroidal AntiInflammatory Drugs) within 24 h before inclusion, - Use of topical medications applied to the painful region within 2 days before the inclusion; use of opioids within 7 days before the inclusion, - Use of corticosteroid drugs by any route of administration within 30 days before the inclusion, - Use of myorelaxant drugs within 3 days before the inclusion, - Pregnant or lactating women, or women of childbearing age not using a reliable method of contraception, or women of not child-bearing potential if not permanently sterilised or if not in post-menopausal status from at least two years, - Males not to agree to use a reliable method of contraception during the study and the follow up period, if sexually active with a female of child-bearing potential, - History of back (cervical, thoracic or lumbosacral) pain as 50% of the time in the 1 year prior to the first visit, - History of any LBP episode, with the exception of the current acute LBP episode, within 3 months prior to the first visit that was greater than mild in pain intensity, or was associated with disability (e.g., loss of time from work, family, or activities of daily living), or necessitated the use of an opioid (narcotic) analgesic including tramadol, - Medical history or physical examination results that suggest the acute LBP or any of the neurological symptoms or signs are caused by a serious medical condition (e.g., fever, chills, unexplained weight loss, bowel or urinary bladder dysfunction or incontinence, bilateral leg weakness, progressive weakness, paralysis), - There is a high probability for surgical intervention for the back pain during the projected time on the study or that there will be an increase in the severity of the leg pain or deficits, - Had either a surgical procedure involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region within 1 year prior to Visit 1 or had >1 surgical procedure(s) involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region, - Has any painful condition that could interfere with the study assessments or with the patient's ability to differentiate the pain associated with the acute LBP episode from pain associated with another condition, - History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures, - Unable or unwilling to discontinue all prohibited medications at the time of randomization and during the time of their participation in the study, - Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse based on medical history, physical examination, urine drug screening, or the Investigator's clinical judgment, - Have filed or plan to file a worker's compensation claim for any issue related to the current acute LBP episode, - Currently involved in litigation or plan to seek legal recourse for any issue related to their acute LBP, - Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to the study drug or any excipients used in their manufacture, - Had previously been enrolled in a muscle relaxant clinical study within 30 days before the inclusion. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Istituto di Reumatologia Complesso Integrato Columbus - Policlinico A. Gemelli | Rome | RM |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Indena S.p.A | Sintesi Research Srl |
Italy,
Bernstein E, Carey TS, Garrett JM. The use of muscle relaxant medications in acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 15;29(12):1346-51. — View Citation
Carta M, Murru L, Botta P, Talani G, Sechi G, De Riu P, Sanna E, Biggio G. The muscle relaxant thiocolchicoside is an antagonist of GABAA receptor function in the central nervous system. Neuropharmacology. 2006 Sep;51(4):805-15. Epub 2006 Jun 30. — View Citation
Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14. Review. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):247-8. — View Citation
Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005. Review. — View Citation
Dillon C, Paulose-Ram R, Hirsch R, Gu Q. Skeletal muscle relaxant use in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):892-6. — View Citation
Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):E668-77. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241e5de. — View Citation
Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. — View Citation
Malanga GA, Dennis RL. Use of medications in the treatment of acute low back pain. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(3):643-53, vii. Review. — View Citation
Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):656-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656. Erratum in: JAMA. 2008 Jun 11;299(22):2630. — View Citation
Mellinghoff H. [Modern muscle relaxants and their clinical application]. Anaesthesist. 1994 Apr;43(4):270-82. Review. German. — View Citation
Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. — View Citation
Wenig CM, Schmidt CO, Kohlmann T, Schweikert B. Costs of back pain in Germany. Eur J Pain. 2009 Mar;13(3):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 3. — View Citation
Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Safety (vital signs, laboratory evaluations and incidence of adverse events) | The primary outcome of the study will be to evaluate the systemic safety (vital signs, laboratory evaluations and incidence of adverse events) of the study drug assessed by Investigator taking into consideration the change from baseline to DAY 5. | From baseline to day 5 | |
Primary | Local tolerability (4-point scale) | Local tolerability assessed by the patient using a 4-point scale (where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe) every day during the treatment period and clinically by Investigator. | From baseline to day 5 | |
Secondary | Analgesic activity (spontaneous pain) by Visual Analogue Scale | The secondary objectives of the study will be to evaluate the analgesic activity of the study drug. Analgesic activity will be evaluated with scoring spontaneous pain. In particular, the secondary outcome of the trial will be the delta of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS Scale) score (100 mm) evaluated from baseline to day 5 (Visit V5). The 100 mm VAS score will consider a 0 mm value as NO pain, and 100 mm value as the most SEVERE pain imaginable. | From baseline to day 5 | |
Secondary | Analgesic activity by Hand-To-Floor Distance (HTFD) | Hand-To-Floor Distance (HTFD) evaluated by Investigator on DAY 1 and 5. HTFD will be measured by the Investigators who will ask the patients to bend forward and try to touch the floor with the fingers; the remaining distance between fingers and ground ("hand-to-floor") will be measured by means of a rule (cm). | On day 1 and 5 | |
Secondary | Quality of Life by SF-36 questionnaire | The patient will be asked to complete the questionnaire on quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire). | From baseline to day 5 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|