Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 6-Month, Open-Label, Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
| NCT number | NCT01922739 |
| Other study ID # | C33237/3104 |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | July 2013 |
| Est. completion date | August 2014 |
| Verified date | November 2021 |
| Source | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This is a 6-month, nonrandomized, open-label extension study to assess the long-term safety of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain who require continuous opioid treatment for an extended period of time. To be eligible for Study 3104, patients were required to have completed the entire double blind treatment period on study drug (either placebo or hydrocodone bitartrate ER tablets) through week 12 of Study 3103 (NCT01789970) and to have met the entry criteria for Study 3104.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 182 |
| Est. completion date | August 2014 |
| Est. primary completion date | August 2014 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients must have participated in and completed the entire double-blind treatment period on study drug through the final study visit (week 12) of study 3103. NOTE: Patients who had a final on-treatment visit (i.e. prior to week 12) are not permitted to participate in study 3104. 2. The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent for study 3104, including re-signing a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. 3. Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal) must use a medically accepted method of contraception, agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method. NOTE: A woman will be considered surgically sterile if she has had a tubal ligation, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. 4. The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the study center for scheduled study visits, as specified in the protocol. 5. The patient must not participate in any other study involving an investigational agent (excluding those who participated in study 3103) while enrolled in the present study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. The patient's current source of pain is different from the low back pain the patient was experiencing at entry into study 3103. NOTE: Any additional source of pain for a patient must be discussed with the medical monitor. 2. The patient has current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse with the exception of nicotine or caffeine. 3. The patient has developed, during study 3103, a medical or psychiatric disease (including suicidality) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. 4. The patient is expected to have surgery during the study. 5. The patient is pregnant or lactating. 6. The patient has developed an active malignancy (excluding basal cell carcinoma) during study 3103. 7. The patient has known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 8. In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values. 9. The patient has developed cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with opioids. 10. The patient is receiving a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI). - Other exclusion criteria apply. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10358 | Anaheim | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10405 | Austin | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10388 | Bay City | Michigan |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10408 | Bell Gardens | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10420 | Bellevue | Washington |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10409 | Berlin | New Jersey |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10397 | Biloxi | Mississippi |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10412 | Birmingham | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10439 | Buffalo | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10425 | Carmichael | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10390 | Cerritos | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10411 | Chicago | Illinois |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10432 | Columbus | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10364 | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10372 | Dallas | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10369 | DeLand | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10430 | Duncansville | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10429 | El Cajon | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10423 | Escondido | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10433 | Everett | Washington |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10389 | Fall River | Massachusetts |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10379 | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10406 | Hazelwood | Missouri |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10371 | Houston | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10391 | Huntington Park | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10365 | Jacksonville | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10377 | Lake Jackson | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10399 | Las Vegas | Nevada |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10445 | Leesburg | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10370 | Los Angeles | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10383 | Marietta | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10385 | Marietta | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10386 | Mechanicsburg | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10431 | Meridian | Idaho |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10743 | Meridian | Idaho |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10426 | Mobile | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10436 | Montgomery | Alabama |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10419 | New Orleans | Louisiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10410 | New York | New York |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10440 | Newburgh | Indiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10444 | Newnan | Georgia |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10446 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10376 | Omaha | Nebraska |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10362 | Orlando | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10381 | Ormond Beach | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10363 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10366 | Phoenix | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10374 | Plano | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10357 | Plantation | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10435 | Royal Palm Beach | Florida |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10401 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10402 | Salt Lake City | Utah |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10378 | San Antonio | Texas |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10392 | Sherman Oaks | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10359 | Shreveport | Louisiana |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10398 | Thousand Oaks | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10373 | Tipton | Pennsylvania |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10428 | Torrance | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10437 | Tucson | Arizona |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10361 | Walnut Creek | California |
| United States | Teva Investigational Site 10414 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Participants With Adverse Events | An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. | Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks) | |
| Primary | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values.
Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Creatinine: >=177 µmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 µmol/L Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN) Alkaline phosphatase: >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN) Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT): >=3* upper limit of normal (ULN) Serum white blood cells: >=20 * 10^9/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L Eosinophils: >=10.0 % Platelets: <=75 * 10^9/L Absolute neutrophils: <=1.0 * 10^9/L Urinalysis: Glucose, Ketones, and Total Protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline |
End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period) | |
| Primary | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.
Significance criteria Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg |
Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks) | |
| Primary | Participants With Shifts From Normal to Abnormal in Physical Examination Findings | The endpoint visit or early termination visit was an abbreviated exam. Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward. | End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period) | |
| Primary | Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Treatment Period) in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | A 12-lead ECG was conducted at the final visit for study 3103 which is used as baseline for this study, and at week 22 of the treatment period [or early termination]). A qualified physician at the study center was responsible for providing interpretation of the ECG.
Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward. |
Baseline (final visit for study 3103), End of trial visit (up to week 22 of Open-label Treatment Period which is up to week 26 including the titration/adjustment period) | |
| Primary | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline to the Final Visit in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results | Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. Hearing loss was classified in degrees of hearing from normal to profound. This classification was determined by the hearing threshold (or the softest sound detected at a specific frequency). The exact ranges that classified hearing loss depended on the exact technique used during testing and on the patient's age. These values were provided by each audiology laboratory that performed the test. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant hearing change were based on guidance from the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA 1994, cited in [Konrad-Martin et al 2005]). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies. | Baseline was within two weeks of the final study visit in study 3103; during study exam was within two weeks of the end of trial visit for study 3104 (up to study week 26) | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each Visit | The WPI was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. At each visit, participants selected the number that best described their worst pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control.
Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward. |
Baseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint of the Treatment Period in Daily Average Pain Intensity (API) Scores During the Previous 24 Hours for Each Visit | The API was recorded daily by participants in an electronic diary using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS-11), a Likert-type scale in which 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable. Participants selected the number that best described their average pain intensity over the last 24 hours. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in pain control.
Endpoint refers to the last observation carried forward. |
Baseline (Day 0 of Treatment Period), Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and Endpoint during the Open-Label Treatment Period | |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study For Lack of Efficacy | Percentage of patients who withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy, as indicated on the early termination form of the case report form (CRF). | Day 1 of the Titration/Adjustment Period to Week 22 of the Treatment Period (total of 25-26 weeks) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|