Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01455519
Other study ID # RIC_Cov_2011
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received October 11, 2011
Last updated October 18, 2017
Start date October 2011
Est. completion date December 2014

Study information

Verified date October 2017
Source Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

You are asked to take part in this study because you have chronic, non-radicular low back pain. This study is done to investigate the pain relieving effects of the study drug Exalgo (Hydromorphone ER) for people who experience chronic non-radicular low back pain. The purpose of this research is to look at how the study drug can be used to benefit people who experience this type of pain. This is a phase IV study done to study the safety and effectiveness of the drug. At this point the drug has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and has been studied in more than 2,000 pain patients in clinical trials, including individuals with low back pain. About 36 subjects will take part in this study.


Description:

As a participant in this study, you will be asked to come to the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC), Center for Pain Studies (446 E Ontario St. Suite 1011, Chicago, IL 60611). Your part in this study will last for 8 weeks and will involve 3 visits to the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and anywhere from weekly phone calls to phone calls every other day.

If you are in this study, you will be placed in one of two study groups: one group will receive the study drug and one will receive a placebo. You will be assigned a study group by chance using a process similar to the flip of a coin. This process is called randomization. Neither you nor the study staff will select the group you will be in. A placebo looks like the study drug but is an inactive substance that has no medication. Researchers use a placebo to see if the study drug works better or is safer than not taking anything. You will have a 66% chance of getting the study drug. You will receive placebo at some point during the study but you will not know whether you are receiving placebo or study drug during the entire study. However, if you have a medical emergency, the investigators can get this information.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 51
Est. completion date December 2014
Est. primary completion date December 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Meets our criteria for Chronic Non-Radicular Back Pain (CNRBP): non-radiating (below buttocks), no frank weakness or atrophy, no sensory or reflex changes

- If female, is not pregnant or breast feeding, and not currently attempting to conceive; if of childbearing potential, use of a highly effective method of birth control (as determined by Pl).

- Able to read and speak English and provide informed consent; ages: 18-90.

- Able to understand and comply with all data collection methodology.

- Subjects may continue any non opioid, non acetaminophen stable drug regimen with no changes during the course of study and not use rescue medications 12 hours before testing.

- Subjects taking opioids must agree to detoxify for the protocol. If they agree they will detox under the direction of the PI before entering the protocol. They may begin the acetaminophen rescue med as per the protocol while in detox.

- Must have pain greater than or equal to 5 on a 10 point Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at phone screening, or pain greater than or equal to 50 on VAS at visit one.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Subjects with hypersensitivity to Opioids, Acetominophen or Exalgo.

- Subjects with severe or untreated psychiatric disturbance (e.g. mania, depression [esp suicidality], anxiety, substance dependence).

- Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia or polymyalgia rheumatica.

- Subjects with severe ongoing or unaddressed medical conditions (e.g. Renal or Hepatic disease [creatinine>1.5 ml/dl; AST or ALT> 3x normal limit], uncontrolled hypertension), pulmonary disease, uncontrolled seizure disorder, gastoparesis or urinary retention.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Hydromorphone ER
Total target dose of 32 mg/day. All subjects will have a lead in for 2 weeks; then begin a 'forced' 2-week up-titration schedule as follows: 8mg/d (1 pill, 5 days), 16mg mg/d (2 pills, 5 days), and 24mg/d (3 pills, 5 days) then finally 32 mg/d (4 pills a day) for the 'stable dose' phase of the study, or identical placebo pills. If intolerable side effects occur, the dose may be reduced to last tolerable does, a minimum of 8 mg/day (or one pill a day), at the discretion of the PI. Subjects unable to tolerate 8 mg/day will be discontinued from the study. A 2-week down-titration will be used.
Sugar pill
Sugar pill

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Chicago Illinois

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Mallinckrodt

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form The McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (MPQ-SF) is a well-validated pain measure that permits separation of the sensory and affective components of pain, which are added together to compute a total score. The scale ranges from 0-45 (0=no pain, 45=the most pain). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Primary Change in VAS Visual Analogue Scale is a self report pain scale on a scale 0(no pain) to 100 (the worst pain imaginable). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in PASS Anxiety scores were collected at least two data points. The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) is a scale from 0 - 100, where 0 = no anxiety and 100 = the most anxiety. Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Pain Disability The Pain Disability Index (PDI) is a seven-item, validated instrument that assesses perceived disability in seven key life areas. It provides a total disability score, and is an indirect measure of self efficacy. The Pain Disability Scale is a scale from 0 - 70, where 0 = no Disability and 70 = the most Disability. Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Stair Climb Time Time to climb 1 flight of stairs Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Treadmill Distance Walked Treadmill distance walked in 6 minutes Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Sit to Stand Repetitions Sit to stand repetitions completed in 1 minute Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Distance to Floor Distance from fingers to Floor when bending forward. A functional test of flexibility Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in Time to Lift Box Time to lift 13 pound box to floor and back up to table. Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in NRS After Stair Climb Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional stair climb test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in NRS After Treadmill Walk Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional treadmill walk test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in NRS After Sit to Stand Repetitions Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional sit to stand test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
Secondary Change in NRS After Box Lift Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was given verbally after completing functional box lift test on a scale 0-10 (0=none, and 10=the worst). Collected at 2 visits over 8-10 weeks: Visit 1 and Visit 4. Change values were calculated from Baseline to post intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.