Clinical Trials Logo

Low Back Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01550562 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Effects of Programming Parameters on Back Pain Relief in Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

Start date: February 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of varying programming parameters in subthreshold spinal cord stimulation therapy for pain relief.

NCT ID: NCT01483573 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Effect of Hamstring Stretching and Neural Mobilization on Range of Motion and Low Back Pain

Start date: May 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study was designed to answer 3 primary research questions: 1. In adults with low back pain, reduced SLR ROM (Range of Motion) and a positive sensitized SLR (Straight leg raise) test, does neurodynamic mobilization result in greater SLR ROM, pain reduction and perceived improvement than muscle stretching? 2. In adults with low back pain, reduced SLR ROM and a negative sensitized SLR test, does muscle stretching result in greater SLR ROM, pain reduction and perceived improvement than neurodynamic mobilization? 3. In adults with low back and reduced SLR, does neurodynamic mobilization or muscle stretching result in greater SLR ROM, pain reduction and perceived improvement irrespective of the outcome of SLR sensitization? The research hypotheses are threefold: 1. Subjects determined to have nerve-related pain and ROM restrictions by a positive sensitized SLR test would benefit more from neurodynamic mobilization than muscle stretching. 2. Subjects determined to have muscle-related pain and ROM restrictions by a negative sensitized SLR test would benefit more from muscle stretching than neurodynamic mobilization. 3. Subjects would benefit the same from muscle stretching and neurodynamic mobilization when not matched on the outcome of the SLR sensitization.

NCT ID: NCT01403870 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Post Market Study of the Electrophysiological Course of Low Back Pain Using CERSR Technology

Start date: April 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this research study is: 1. to measure with CERSR® (Computerized Electrophysiological Reconstruction of the Spinal Regions) the electrical signals made by the muscles in the lower back during the treatment of the low back pain, and 2. to study the changes which take place in these muscles with treatment. The device is non-invasive which means nothing is put into your body. The CERSR® pad is an adhesive (sticky) array (ordered rows) of electrodes. The investigators hope to find information about the quality of the muscles' electrical signals in reaction to injury causing back pain, which will improve understanding of the nature of back pain and back injury. The investigators also hope to improve treatment by creating a simple test, which will tell us objectively (through computerized measurement) whether the treatment is helping.

NCT ID: NCT01401660 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Study of Low Back Pain Using CERSR® Imaging Technology

Start date: May 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this research study is to measure with CERSR® (Computerized Electrophysiological Reconstruction of the Spinal Regions) the electrical signals made by the muscles in the lower back 1) when the subject has no low back pain 2) during the time low back pain begins, or 3) during the treatment and resolution of the low back pain, and 4) to study the changes which take place in these muscles as the pain improves with physical therapy treatment as an intervention. The hypotheses to be tested are 1) The CERSR® scan parameters for normal (pain-free) subjects are different from those of subjects with low back pain. 2) CERSR® scan aids the physician in determining a directed physical therapy treatment which leads to relief of low back pain following no more than eight weeks of physical therapy, as measured by relief of pain using a Visual Analog Scale and symptom improvement as measured using the Oswestry Disability Index.

NCT ID: NCT01397552 Terminated - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spine Disc Herniation

Dexamethasone Versus Depo Medrol in Lumbar Epidurals

Start date: September 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison of Dexamethasone versus Depo Medrol when used in lumbar epidural injections will be conducted on subjects that have not had previous injections or have not had an injection in the last 12 months. Subjects must be receiving one level injection and not had prior surgery at that level.

NCT ID: NCT01236092 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Low Back Study to Compare Traditional Physical Therapy With Combined Therapy Protocol

Start date: April 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The most common chronic low back pain conditions are a consequence of disc disease as well as muscular and bony etiologies. The discs degenerate and weaken, bulge and are pushed into the space containing the spinal cord or a nerve root resulting in severe pain. A common treatment is then surgery. Whole-body vibration combined with un-weighting traction and specific manual mobilization plus active therapeutic exercise seems to treat chronic low back pain by non-invasively firing muscles of the lumbar spine. The investigators are seeking to show such therapy reduces the need for surgery and significantly out performs traditional physical as the preferred conservative treatment.

NCT ID: NCT01206699 Terminated - Clinical trials for Subjects Suffering of Lateralized Lumbago on Side of the Malformation (Neo-articulation)

Involvement of Transverso-sacral- Neo- Articulations or of Transverso-iliac Articulations in Chronic Lumbago

Start date: September 2010
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The specific aim of this study is to determine whether, when treated with corticoid infiltration, certain chronic lumbagos could be explained by the presence of a neo-articulation.The primary criteria is to determine the difference between the mean pain during the latest 24 hours preceding the infiltration and the mean pain preceding the visit S4 (visit 4 weeks after the infiltration)

NCT ID: NCT01125917 Terminated - Clinical trials for Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Safety of BTDS in Subjects With Low Back Pain: A 52-Week Extension Phase of BUP3015

Start date: June 2004
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the extension phase is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS). Subjects begin the extension phase on BTDS 5 mcg/h and may up- or down-titrate the dose [up to BTDS 20 micrograms (mcg) / hour (h)] depending on adequate pain relief and tolerability.

NCT ID: NCT01089478 Terminated - Back Pain Clinical Trials

Cytology Study of Cells From Patients With Low Back Pain

Start date: April 2005
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The investigators are doing this study to learn more about the cause of back pain with or without pain shooting down one or both legs. The investigators specifically want to know if cells that move into injured areas of the body are present in a space in the spine (epidural space) of patients with back pain and with or without shooting pain. The investigators will collect cells when patients are being treated, then examine the cells using a microscope. The investigators also will shine different colors of light into the epidural space to see if there is a correlation between how different colors of light are reflected and the types of cells present.

NCT ID: NCT01085448 Terminated - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Clinical Prediction Rule for Clinical Lumbar Instability

Start date: March 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to determine if assessment of additional measures of trunk neuromuscular control will improve the ability to identify patients with low back pain who successfully respond to trunk stabilization exercises. Question: What clinical characteristics are associated with patients that respond positively to a program of core stabilization exercises? Hypothesis: Clinical characteristics that show a decrease in trunk motor control will be associated with a positive response to stabilization exercises.