View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain.
Filter by:Intra-annular injections of non-autologous fibrin for moderate to severe chronic low back pain (LBP).
The purpose of this pilot efficacy study is to examine the effects of EMG-biofeedback (EMG-BF) on pain-related outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients, Recent mastectomy and lumpectomy patients, and patients with episodic migraine. EMG-BF facilitates neuromuscular retraining and muscle relaxation by using audio and visual stimuli using an EMG surface electrode-based biosensor and a software installed on a tablet or smart phone. For this pilot efficacy study, we will recruit 125 patients with chronic low back pain, 125 patients who are expected to undergo mastectomy and 80 patients with episodic migraine. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the JOGO Digital Therapeutics EMG Biofeedback device or treatment as usual control group. Patients assigned to the intervention group will be asked to complete self-report questionnaires assessing demographics, pain intensity, negative affect, physical function, pain catastrophizing and sleep, will undergo QST and will be asked to wear Actiwatches to keep track of health behaviors, prior to and after completing the intervention. The intervention consists of weekly sessions during which participants will be instructed on how to use the device by a trained biofeedback instructor. Patients in the control group will undergo sensory testing procedures at baseline and after treatment period but will receive no active treatment. The aims of this study are to examine the impact of EMG-BF on pain and QST and the impact of EMG-BF on psychosocial function. We hypothesize that patients that will undergo the EMG-BF will demonstrate reductions in pain, physical functioning, sleep, pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression.
PAES, double blind, double dummy, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study to demonstrate superiority of Tricortin 1000 over placebo in improvement in pain relief as change from baseline to 15 days in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
This is a prospective 3x3 crossover study with randomized treatment order, comparing the short-term efficacy of conventional-spinal cord stimulation (CON-SCS) with subcutaneous stimulatio, high frequency-spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS), and Combination Therapy, in patients with chronic intractable back pain (with or without leg pain).
Chronic low back pain is a public health problem, and there is strong evidence that it is associated with a complex interaction of biopsychosocial factors. Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) is a promising new intervention that deals with potentially modifiable multidimensional aspects of pain (eg, provocative cognitive, movement and lifestyle behaviors). In order to better understand the contextual effects, the aim of the current study is to investigate the efficacy of CFT compared with a sham-intervention for pain intensity and disability post-intervention in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which 152 (18 - 60 years old) patients with CLBP will be enrolled. The patients will be randomly allocated to receive: (1) CFT intervention or (2) sham-intervention. The experimental group will receive individualized CFT in a pragmatic manner (5 to 7 sessions) based on the clinical progression of participants. The sham group will attend six sessions: consisted of 30 minutes of photobiomodulation using a detuned device and more 15 minutes of talking about neutral topics. Participants will be assessed pre and post-intervention, three months and six months after randomization. Patients from both groups also will receive an educational booklet. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity and disability post-intervention. The secondary outcomes will be: pain intensity and disability at 3- and 6-month follow-up, as well as self-efficacy, global perceived effect of improvement and functioning post-intervention, 3- and 6-month follow-up. The patients and the assessor will be blinded to treatment administered (active vs. sham). The between-group differences (effects of treatment) and their respective 95% confidence intervals will be calculated by constructing linear mixed models. Treatment effect for the primary and secondary outcomes will be estimated using mixed linear models. To the best of our knowledge, the current study will be the first to compare CFT vs. sham intervention. Sham-controlled RCTs may help to understand the influence of non-specific factors on treatment outcomes. Considering complex interventions as CFT, it is imperative to understand the impact of contextual factors on outcomes.
This study evaluates the effectivity and safety of MSC implantation on Degenerative Disc Disease Patients by assessing visual analog scale, ROM improvement and MRI examination.
Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint in the clinical setting. Among all the differential diagnosis for LBP, superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment is the commonly omitted one. The superior cluneal nerve is the terminal branch of the lateral branches of the posterior rami of the L1-L3 spinal nerves, which passes through the osseous tunnel interposed between the thoracolumbar fascia and iliac crest. This nerve can be entrapped due to poor posture, trauma or stretching of the surrounding thoracolumbar fascia and osseous membrane. The cardinal symptom of the superior cluneal nerve entrapment is buttock pain. Sometimes the pain may radiate to the lower limb, which mimics sciatica, and makes the diagnosis difficult. Early diagnosis and treatment of SCN entrapment is crucial, which can facilitate the improvement of health related quality of life and decrement the socioeconomic loss due to disability. The study aims is (1) to scan the SCN and thoracolumbar fascia by ultrasound in patients with LBP and normal subjects. The transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to confirm the location of SCN by asking the subject to depict the sensory distribution after stimulation; (2) to analyze the related factors of LBP with SCN entrapment, which may help in setting up the diagnostic criteria of SCN entrapment; (3) to analyze the therapeutic effect of perineural injection to SCN in SCN entrapment, and to find the factors that related responsiveness.
To investigate whether different clinical, psychophysical and neurophysiological phenotypes can be identified among low back pain patients
There are many patients coming daily to our office with the complaint of chronic lumbosacral pain radiating or not to the legs that need a proper diagnosis before any treatment is decided. The diagnosis, based mostly on radiological exams, carries a risk of failure to diagnose the sacroiliac joint as the cause of the pain. The study proposes that a quick interrogatory followed by a physical exam with the adequate provocative testing can raise the suspicion of the diagnosis that the pain is originating from the sacroiliac joint. Thereafter, a diagnostic sacroiliac joint block can be performed. The study aims to correlate findings from patient history and physical examination with eventual diagnosis.
Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of instrument-based mobilization compared with manual mobilization in patients with non-specific low back pain (NLBP), in terms of spinal muscle activation, decrease in pain, and improvement in range of motion (ROM). Design: Randomized clinical trial, double blind. Participants and interventions: A total of 66 participants with localized NLBP will be divided into 2 groups matched for sex, age, and body mass index. The intervention group will receive central postero-anterior mobilization with a force of 150 N through physiotherapy instrument mobilization at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. The control group will receive central postero-anterior grade III mobilization through the pisiform grip method at the level of pain in the lumbar spine. Main outcome measures: Measurements will be taken before the intervention, after the 1st session, after the 6th session, and at 4 weeks follow-up. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging will be done to identify lumbar multifidus (LM) activation through the measurement of muscle thickness at the level of L5-L4 vertebrae, during rest and lower-extremity movement. Each participant will self-rate the pain intensity in the lumbar spine according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The pressure-pain threshold (PPT) will be measured using an algometer. Lumbar ROM will be measured using a dual inclinometer method in flexion and extension. The results will be compared between the intervention and control groups through mixed analysis of variance for LM thickness, lumbar ROM, PPT, and NPRS.