View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain.
Filter by:Low back pain is a challenging condition, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 84%. The estimated prevalence of chronic non-specific low back pain is of approximately 23%. Although pain is a sensory experience triggered by a peripheral stimulus, psychosocial factors influence on its perception and on the risk of chronification. Chronic Low Back Pain imposes a substantial socioeconomic burden to patients, families, and healthcare systems worldwide. It is a multifactorial condition, characterized by a combination of physical, psychosocial and occupational factors. We have planned two working hypotheses: (1) coordinating several healthcare professionals is feasible to manage chronic non-specific low back pain through telematics multidisciplinary approach; (2) telematics multidisciplinary approach improves the quality of life of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and in whom conservative treatment has failed. Hence, we aim to assess the feasibility and effect of telematics multidisciplinary approach in patients suffering from chronic non-specific low back pain and who have not improved with conservative treatment. Patients will be randomized to the telematics multidisciplinary approach (Experimental Group) or to the Standard of Care (Control Group). Scheduled and periodic telematics multidisciplinary sessions will be performed. Each session will consist of an integrated program that combines rehabilitation (i.e., group-based exercise program), psychological treatment and social work sessions. Standard of Care, after conservative treatment failure, depends mainly on the physician in charge's discretion and on the patients' preferences. An exploratory analysis will be performed. The results of this clinical trial will provide evidence that a scheduled telematics multidisciplinary approach will improve the quality of life of these patients and empower them to be more autonomous. Likewise, telematics multidisciplinary approach is feasible to manage chronic non-specific low back pain in patients unresponsive to conservative treatment. Consequently, these patients are less likely to wander through different medical specialties seeking for a solution to their condition, presumably avoiding ineffective back surgeries. The results will also highlight the importance of patients playing an active role in their own treatment to successfully manage chronic non-specific low back pain.
The purpose of this study is to test whether LY3526318 is efficacious and safe in relieving chronic low back pain (CLBP). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.
This trial compared traditional pain and stress education plus physical therapy to pain neuroscience education plus physical therapy in individuals with post-traumatic stress and chronic low back pain.
Low back pain is a common problem that affects many people at some point in their lives. These people constitute a big part of the disease burden due to their recurrent complaints. About 45% of individuals with chronic low back pain seek medical attention. This situation makes chronic low back pain the second reason for individuals to apply to the hospital. Exercise therapy is the first option that comes to mind in the management of low back pain. It is seen that exercise therapy both reduces the intensity of pain and reduces the recurrence rate of complaints. When the literature is examined, it is observed that among the exercise models, stabilization exercises can provide more benefits than general exercises in reducing pain and improving disability. The COVID-19 pandemic causes disruptions in face-to-face rehabilitation services. The development of telemedicine and telerehabilitation services, whose popularity is increasing with the advancing technology, gained momentum with these disruptions. With telerehabilitation, long-term treatments tailored to the needs of the patients can be offered, the cost is low, and the patients can exercise at home, on their own, at their own pace, whenever they want. These reasons make telerehabilitation stand out especially during the pandemic period. The aim of the study planned in this context is to investigate short and long-term results of remote and face-to-face exercise training on function and disease symptoms for individuals with chronic low back pain.
Introduction: Nonspecific low back pain is the most common cause of visits to medical personnel and is the largest cause of absenteeism in the world. (1), Nonspecific low back pain accounts for 85% of low back pain, notably affecting quality of life and working life (2), There is a 50-70% probability that a person will have low back pain during their life ( 3), lumbago produces 300,000 years lived with disability (ADL), being the first burden of disease in Chile, surpassing hypertensive heart disease and depression (4). There are many therapeutic approaches to the management of nonspecific low back pain, including high-speed, low-amplitude spinal manipulations (5). This technique consists of applying a short and rapid force at the level of the joint that is restricted, in order to restore normal joint mobility. The physiological effects of manipulations are not sufficiently studied, but some authors (6) (7) suggest that the nervous system is the mediator of the effects of spinal manipulation. Among non-pharmacological interventions, numerous clinical guidelines recommend the use of therapeutic exercise for low back pain (8), including a wide variety of types of recommended exercises, the most traditionally recommended being aerobic exercises, exercises that involve stretching postures of the back. vertebral musculature, strengthening and strength exercises (9) and central stabilization exercises (10). Recently, the effects of inspiratory muscle and diaphragm training exercises in patients with low back pain are being investigated (11). The application of an elastic bandage (12) in the lumbar area generates a proprioceptive signal through the skin, producing analgesia and a feeling of support in the area. Objectives: To compare the effects of different therapeutic approaches in combination with spinal manipulation. Design and method: Single-blind randomized clinical trial Results: Significant differences are expected before and after treatment and differences between groups. Conclusion: The aims of this study is to demonstrate that High speed and low amplitude spinal manipulation plus other conservative treatment is a valid therapeutic strategy for the management of nonspecific low back pain
Chronic low back pain is a common problem worldwide. In treatment, conservative methods usually are used. Basic Body Awareness Therapy is related to mindfulness-based therapies and meditation techniques. It is a method that has been used and found effective in some diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system. Therefore, in this study, body awareness was applied in addition to conventional treatment in patients with chronic low back pain.
The main objective of this study is: • To evaluate the immediate hypoalgesic effect of an aerobic exercise session of different intensities in patients with chronic low back pain; The secondary objective is: • To explore whether pain intensity, level of physical activity, functionality, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depression interfere with the immediate hypoalgesic effect of exercise.
Chronic low back pain effects more than 50% of general population. It's prevalence is higher is young adults that are economically active adults. Its significance is often underestimated because usually young adults ignore these initial episodes of low back pain due to their busy life style or life full of commitments. Approximately 70% of adults have at least one episode of low back pain during their lifetimes.
Low back pain is a frequent clinical condition in pregnancy. Drugs treatments are limited. Other therapies are often used, associated or not with drugs (acupuncture, manipulative medicine, physical therapies, homeopathy). Clinical studies suggest a reduction of low back pain with these therapies. The primary objective of this study is to determinate how many pregnant women use these alternative therapeutics. In a second time, we want evaluate efficiency of these therapeutics, especially in pain modification and on quality of life. Our study is a declarative study on pregnant women in Lorraine.
Finding out if tissue changes (thickness, histogram and shrinkage rate) that occur in the lumbar multifidus after deep dry needling are related to changes in patient's pain and disability.